Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Function Debate in Philosophy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the debate on the notion of biological function and on functional explanation as this takes place in philosophy. It describes the different perspectives, issues, intuitions, theories and arguments that have emerged. The author shows that the debate has been too heavily influenced by the concerns of a naturalistic philosophy of mind and argues that in order to improve our understanding of biology the attention should be shifted from the study of intuitions to the study of the actual practice of biological inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, F.R. (1979). A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 493–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C., M. Bekoff and G.V. Lauder (Eds). (1997). Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson, R. and G.V. Lauder (1994). Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). (2002). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baublys, K.K. (1975). Comments on some recent analyses of functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 42: 496–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M. (1992). Where's the good in teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter (1987). Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J. (1999). Functional and evolutionary explanations in morphology. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49: 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J. and G. von Wahlert (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. (1976). Wright on functions. Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. (2002). A Rebuttal on Functions. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 63–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, R.N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D.J. (1998). Etiological theories of function: A geographical survey. Biology and Philosophy 13: 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D.J. (Ed). (1999). Function, Selection and Design. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, J. (1964). Teleological explanation in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14: 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, J. (1965). Teleological explanation in biology: A reply. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.S. (2000). The nature of natural norms: Why selected functions are systemic capacity functions. Noûs 34: 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.S. (2001). Norms of Nature. Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.L. (1988). Explaining Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, B. (1979). Function attributions and functional explanations. Philosophy of Science 46: 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enç, B. and F. Adams (1992). Functions and goal directedness. Philosophy of Science 59: 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H.G. and B. Poole (1966). Functional analyses in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D. (1997). Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (1993). Functions: Consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (1994). A modern history theory of functions. Noûs 28: 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and E.S. Vrba (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In: Gross, L. (Ed). Symposium on Sociological Theory. Harper and Row, New York. pp. 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. and P. Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15: 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R.A. (1975). The concept of function. In: Baerends, G.R., C. Beer and A. Manning (Eds). Function and Evolution in Behavior. Clarendon, Oxford. pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, B.L. (1989). Functional explanations in sociobiology. Biology and Philosophy 4: 131–158, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and design. In: French, P.A., T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (Eds). Philosophy of Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. pp. 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T.A.F. (1986). The logic of functional explanation in biology. In: The Tasks of Contemporary Philosophy. Proceedings of the 10th Wittgenstein Symposium (Kirchberg/Wechsel, 1985). Hölder-Pitcher-Tempsky, Vienna. pp. 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T.A.F. (2001). Structures in Science: Heuristic Patterns Based on Cognitive Structures. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T.A.F. and A. Wisniewski (1994). An erotetic approach to explanation by specification. Erkenntnis 40: 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannoo, M.J. and S.J. Lannoo (1993). Why do electric fishes swim backwards? Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, J.G. (1993). Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8: 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T. (1982). The Strategy of Life. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M. and M. Bunge (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1993). Proximate and ultimate causation. Biology and Philosophy 8: 93–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1997). This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content. Philosophical Review 95: 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1989a). An ambiguity in the notion “Function”. Biology and Philosophy 4: 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1989b). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1993a). Propensities, exaptations, and the brain. In: White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge. pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1993b). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (2002). Biofunctions: Two paradigms. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.D. (1989). The causal background of functional explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3: 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.D. (1993). Dispositions or etiologies? A comment on Bigelow and Pargetter. Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.D. (1995). Function, fitness and disposition. Biology and Philosophy 10: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, R. (1972). Biological adaptation: A reply. Philosophy of Science 39: 529–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1977). Teleology revisited. Journal of Philosophy 74: 261–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K. (1980). Teleology in Biology. Paper presented to the AAP conference in 1980.

  • Neander, K. (1983). Abnormal Psychobiology. Ph.D. Thesis. La Trobe University.

  • Neander, K. (1991a). Function as selected effects: The conceptual analyst's defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K. (1991b). The teleological notion of ‘Function’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K. (2004). Teleological theories of mental content. In: E.E. Zalta (Ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2004).

  • Nissen, L. (1980). Nagel's self-regulation analysis of teleology. Philosophical Forum 12: 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, L. (1993). Four ways of eliminating mind from teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, L. (1997). Teleological Language in the Life Sciences. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pap, A. (1962). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and Representation. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, E.W. (1985). What is wrong with etiological accounts of biological function? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 310–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1971). Functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 38: 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1973). The Philosophy of Biology. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2002). Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F. (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P.H. (1999). Proper function and recent selection. Philosophy of Science 66: S210–S222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D.M. (1996). Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D.M. and A. Ariew (1996). A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C. (1972). Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A.G. (1999). Explanation Without a Cause. Utrecht University. Ph.D. Thesis. Electronically available at http://www.knoware.nl/users/arnow/diss/

  • Wouters, A.G. (2003). Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science 34: 633–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A.G. (2005). The functional perspective of organismic biology. In: Reydon, T.A.C. and L. Hemerik (Eds). Current Themes in Theoretical Biology: A Dutch Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, A.G. (forthcoming). Functional explanation in biology. In: R. Festa, A. Alisda and J. Peijnenburg (Eds). Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry. Rodopi, Amsterdam.

  • Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biology, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9516, NL-2300, RA, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Arno Wouters

Authors
  1. Arno Wouters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arno Wouters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wouters, A. The Function Debate in Philosophy. Acta Biotheor 53, 123–151 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-5353-6

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-5353-6

Key Words

Search

Navigation