Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effects of Surface Roughness on Permeability and Fluid Flow-Induced Wall Shear Stress in Scaffolds

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we investigated surface roughness effects on bone scaffold permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress (WSS) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Scaffolds are made of interconnected microchannels, whose fluid flow can be examined from the perspective of fluid flow dynamics. Given that the roughness of microchannel surfaces serves a non-negligible function in the fluid dynamics within the channels, it is believed that the wall roughness of scaffolds can play an important role in their permeability and WSS. Given the criticality of permeability and WSS in the effective biological functioning of scaffolds, we investigated manufacturing-induced surface roughness effects on the two aforementioned biocompatibility characteristics. To this end, three scaffolds with square pores of different sizes (300, 600, and 900 µm) and identical porosity (63%) were designed. Six roughness levels (0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 µm) were established for the scaffold walls, thus enabling us to develop 18 scaffold models. The pressure drop and WSS in the scaffolds were then measured by CFD. Scaffold permeability was calculated using Darcy’s law, with reference to geometrical parameters and the pressure drop derived from the CFD analysis. In all the scaffolds, high roughness decreased permeability and WSS. A significant difference in WSS reduction was found between the models with smooth scaffolds and the models with scaffolds that had a roughness of 20 µm. Except for the scaffold with a pore size of 300 µm, all the others showed no considerable change in permeability at different roughness levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdalrahman, T., S. Scheiner, and C. Hellmich. Is trabecular bone permeability governed by molecular ordering-induced fluid viscosity gain? Arguments from re-evaluation of experimental data in the framework of homogenization theory. J. Theor. Biol. 365:433–444, 2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi, S. M., S. A. Yavari, R. Wauthle, B. Pouran, J. Schrooten, H. Weinans, and A. A. Zadpoor. Additively manufactured open-cell porous biomaterials made from six different space-filling unit cells: the mechanical and morphological properties. Materials 8:1871–1896, 2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali, D., and S. Sen. Finite element analysis of the effect of boron nitride nanotubes in beta tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite elastic modulus using the RVE model. Compos. Part B 90:336–340, 2016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali, D., and S. Sen. Finite element analysis of boron nitride nanotubes’ shielding effect on the stress intensity factor of semielliptical surface crack in a wide range of matrixes using RVE model. Compos. Part B 110:351–360, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali, D., and S. Sen. Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 75:262–270, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ayati, B. P., C. M. Edwards, G. F. Webb, and J. P. Wikswo. A mathematical model of bone remodeling dynamics for normal bone cell populations and myeloma bone disease. Biol. Direct 5:28, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartnikowski, M., T. J. Klein, F. P. W. Melchels, and M. A. Woodruff. Effects of scaffold architecture on mechanical characteristics and osteoblast response to static and perfusion bioreactor cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111:1440–1451, 2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanquer, S. B. G., M. Werner, M. Hannula, S. Sharifi, G. P. R. Lajoinie, D. Eglin, J. Hyttinen, A. A. Poot, and D. W. Grijpma. Surface curvature in triply-periodic minimal surface architectures as a distinct design parameter in preparing advanced tissue engineering scaffolds. Biofabrication 9:025001, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brindley, D., K. Moorthy, J.-H. Lee, C. Mason, H.-W. Kim, and I. Wall. Bioprocess forces and their impact on cell behavior: implications for bone regeneration therapy. J. Tissue Eng. 2011:620247, 2011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavo, M., and S. Scaglione. Scaffold microstructure effects on functional and mechanical performance: integration of theoretical and experimental approaches for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 68:872–879, 2016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, G. B., R. Xu, C. Zhang, and Y. G. Lv. Responses of MSCs to 3D scaffold matrix mechanical properties under oscillatory perfusion culture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9:1207–1218, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Conway, D. E., M. T. Breckenridge, E. Hinde, E. Gratton, C. S. Chen, and M. A. Schwartz. Fluid shear stress on endothelial cells modulates mechanical tension across VE-cadherin and PECAM-1. Curr. Biol. 23:1024–1030, 2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Croce, G., and P. D’Agaro. Numerical simulation of roughness effect on microchannel heat transfer and pressure drop in laminar flow. J. Phys. D 38:1518–1530, 2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai, B. M., M. X. Li, and Y. T. Ma. Effect of surface roughness on liquid friction and transition characteristics in micro- and mini-channels. Appl. Therm. Eng. 67:283–293, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dias, M. R., P. R. Fernandes, J. M. Guedes, and S. J. Hollister. Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomech. 45:938–944, 2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Egan, P. F., S. J. Ferguson, and K. Shea. Design of hierarchical three-dimensional printed scaffolds considering mechanical and biological factors for bone tissue engineering. J. Mech. Des. 139:061401, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gómez, S., M. D. Vlad, J. López, and E. Fernández. Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 42:341–350, 2016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham, J. M., B. P. Ayati, S. A. Holstein, and J. A. Martin. The role of osteocytes in targeted bone remodeling: a mathematical model. PLoS ONE 8:10, 2013.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo, L., H. Xu, and L. Gong. Influence of wall roughness models on fluid flow and heat transfer in microchannels. Appl. Therm. Eng. 84:399–408, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrikson, W. J., A. J. Deegan, Y. Yang, C. A. van Blitterswijk, N. Verdonschot, L. Moroni, and J. Rouwkema. Influence of additive manufactured scaffold architecture on the distribution of surface strains and fluid flow shear stresses and expected osteochondral cell differentiation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5:6, 2017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandlikar, S. G., D. Schmitt, A. L. Carrano, and J. B. Taylor. Characterization of surface roughness effects on pressure drop in single-phase flow in minichannels. Physics of Fluids 17:100606, 2005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kemppainen, J. M., and S. J. Hollister. Differential effects of designed scaffold permeability on chondrogenesis by chondrocytes and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 31:279–287, 2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lesman, A., Y. Blinder, and S. Levenberg. Modeling of flow-induced shear stress applied on 3D cellular scaffolds: implications for vascular tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105:645–654, 2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lipowiecki, M., M. Ryvolova, A. Tottosi, N. Kolmer, S. Naher, S. A. Brennan, M. Vazquez, and D. Brabazon. Permeability of rapid prototyped artificial bone scaffold structures. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 102:4127–4135, 2014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marin, A. C., and D. Lacroix. The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment. Interface Focus 5:8, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitsak, A. G., J. M. Kemppainen, M. T. Harris, and S. J. Hollister. Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo. Tissue Eng. Part A 17:1831–1839, 2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyashita, S., N. E. M. B. Ahmed, M. Murakami, K. Iohara, T. Yamamoto, H. Horibe, K. Kurita, T. Takano-Yamamoto, and M. Nakashima. Mechanical forces induce odontoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on three-dimensional biomimetic scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11:434–446, 2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Palacio, M. L. B., and B. Bhushan. Bioadhesion: a review of concepts and applications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 370:2321–2347, 2012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Palacio, M., S. Schricker, and B. Bhushan. Morphology and protein adsorption characteristics of block copolymer surfaces. J. Microsc. 240:239–248, 2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pelević, N., and T. H. van der Meer. Heat transfer and pressure drop in microchannels with random roughness. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 99:125–135, 2016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rahbari, A., H. Montazerian, E. Davoodi, and S. Homayoonfar. Predicting permeability of regular tissue engineering scaffolds: scaling analysis of pore architecture, scaffold length, and fluid flow rate effects. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 20:231–241, 2017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajendran, P., T. Rengarajan, J. Thangavel, Y. Nishigaki, D. Sakthisekaran, G. Sethi, and I. Nishigaki. The vascular endothelium and human diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 9:1057–1069, 2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rawool, A. S., S. K. Mitra, and S. G. Kandlikar. Numerical simulation of flow through microchannels with designed roughness. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2:215–221, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rumpler, M., A. Woesz, J. W. C. Dunlop, J. T. van Dongen, and P. Fratzl. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. J. R. Soc. Interface 5:1173–1180, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Santamaría, V. A. A., M. Malvè, A. Duizabo, A. M. Tobar, G. G. Ferrer, J. M. G. Aznar, M. Doblaré, and I. Ochoa. Computational methodology to determine fluid related parameters of non regular three-dimensional scaffolds. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41:2367–2380, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Serpooshan, V., M. Julien, O. Nguyen, H. Wang, A. Li, N. Muja, J. E. Henderson, and S. N. Nazhat. Reduced hydraulic permeability of three-dimensional collagen scaffolds attenuates gel contraction and promotes the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 6:3978–3987, 2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sonam, S., S. R. Sathe, E. K. F. Yim, M. P. Sheetz, and C. T. Lim. Cell contractility arising from topography and shear flow determines human mesenchymal stem cell fate. Sci. Rep. 6:20415, 2016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Taylor, J. B., A. L. Carrano, and S. G. Kandlikar. Characterization of the effect of surface roughness and texture on fluid flow—past, present, and future. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 45:962–968, 2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Thompson, M. K. Methods for the Generation of Rough Surfaces in ANSYS. Cambridge: Mechanical Engineering Department, MIT, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Truscello, S., G. Kerckhofs, S. Van Bael, G. Pyka, J. Schrooten, and H. Van Oosterwyck. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study. Acta Biomater. 8:1648–1658, 2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Bael, S., Y. C. Chai, S. Truscello, M. Moesen, G. Kerckhofs, H. Van Oosterwyck, J. P. Kruth, and J. Schrooten. The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 8:2824–2834, 2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Voronov, R., S. VanGordon, V. I. Sikavitsas, and D. V. Papavassiliou. Computational modeling of flow-induced shear stresses within 3D salt-leached porous scaffolds imaged via micro-CT. J. Biomech. 43:1279–1286, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vossenberg, P., G. A. Higuera, G. van Straten, C. A. van Blitterswijk, and A. J. B. van Boxtel. Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 8:499, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, D., Y. Liu, Y. Q. Yang, and D. M. Xiao. Theoretical and experimental study on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel metal parts obtained through selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp. J. 22:706–716, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, G. L., D. W. Yang, Y. Wang, D. Niu, X. L. Zhao, and G. F. Ding. Heat transfer and friction characteristics of the microfluidic heat sink with variously-shaped ribs for chip cooling. Sensors 15:9547–9562, 2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wittkowske, C., G. C. Reilly, D. Lacroix, and C. M. Perrault. In vitro bone cell models: impact of fluid shear stress on bone formation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4:87, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ali, D., and S. Sen. Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: computational fluid dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models. Comput. Biol. Med. 99:201–208, 2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yan, C., L. Hao, A. Hussein, and P. Young. Ti–6Al–4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 51:61–73, 2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yousaf, M., and S. Usman. Natural convection heat transfer in a square cavity with sinusoidal roughness elements. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 90:180–190, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao, F. H., T. J. Vaughan, and L. M. McNamara. Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 15:561–577, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by Ataturk University. The authors would like to thank the Ataturk University for funding and Dr. Kamil Kabakus for technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Davar Ali & Sadri Sen

Authors
  1. Davar Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sadri Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davar Ali.

Additional information

Associate Editor Ender Finol oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, D., Sen, S. Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effects of Surface Roughness on Permeability and Fluid Flow-Induced Wall Shear Stress in Scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 46, 2023–2035 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2101-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2101-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation