Skip to main content
Log in

On the calibration of structural credit spread models

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Annals of Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical findings are mixed about the performance of structural models for term structure of credit spreads. It is commonly believed that all structural models have equally poor performance after calibration. However, proper calibration is not a trivial issue, especially for highly structural models. This paper proposes a more accurate procedure for calibrating two models: Leland–Toft (J Finance 51:987–1019, 1996) and Collin-Dufresne and Goldstein (J Finance 56:2177–2208, 2001). Using rating-based bond data, we find that the Leland–Toft model has significantly greater explanatory power for credit spreads across rating categories than previously reported. We provide theoretical explanations for these findings, and further extend our empirical analysis to include 286 individual senior bonds. Our findings help clarify the controversies over the performance of structural models in general and that of the Leland–Toft model in particular. In addition, we offer a rigorous procedure that can be used for calibrating other structural models more effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade G. and Kaplan S. (1998). How costly is financial (not economic) distress? Evidence from highly levered transactions that became distressed. J Finance 53: 1443–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari C. (1988). Debt/equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence. J Finance 43: 507–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F. and Cox J. (1976). Valuing corporate securities: Some effects of bond indenture provisions. J Finance 31: 351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey R.A. and Myers S.C. (1996). Principles of Corporate Finance, 5th edn. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M. and Schwartz E. (1978). Corporate income taxes, valuation and the problem of optimal capital structure. J Bus 51: 103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caouette J.B., Altman E.I. and Narayanan P. (1998). Managing Credit Risk: the Next Great Financial Challenge. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin-Dufresne P. and Goldstein R.S. (2001). Do credit spreads reflect stationary leverage ratios?. J Finance 56: 2177–2208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin-Dufresne P., Goldstein R.S. and Martin J.S. (2001). The determinants of credit spread changes. J Finance 56: 2177–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton E.J., Gruber M.J., Agrawal D. and Mann C. (2001). Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds. J Finance 56: 247–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom Y.H., Helwege J. and Huang J.-Z. (2003). Structural models of corporate bond pricing: An empirical analysis. Rev Financ Stud 17: 499–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fons J. (1994). Using default rates to model the term structure of credit risk. Financial Anal J September–October: 25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth D., Hennessy C.A. and Leland H.E. (2007). Can the trade-off theory explain debt structure?. Rev Financ Stud 20: 1389–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hittle L.C., Haddad K. and Gitman L.J. (1992). Over-the-counter firms, asymmetric information and financing preferences. Rev Financ Econ 2(1): 81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.-Z., Huang, M.: How much of the corporate-Treasury yield spread is due to credit risk? working paper, Penn State and Stanford Universities (2003)

  • Jones E.P., Mason S. and Rosenfeld E. (1984). Contingent claims analysis of corporate capital structures: An empirical investigation. J Finance 39: 611–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland H. (1994). Corporate debt value, bond covenants and optional capital structure. J Finance 49: 1213–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland H. and Toft K. (1996). Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy and the term structure of credit spreads. J Finance 51: 987–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff F. and Schwartz E. (1995). A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt. J Finance 50: 789–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 29: 449–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M. (1977). Debt and taxes. J Finance 32: 261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S.C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. J Finance 39: 575–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S.C. (1993). Still searching for optimal capital structure. J Appl Corporate Finance 39: 4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinegar J.M. and Wilbricht L. (1989). What managers think of capital structure theory: A survey. Financ Manage Winter: 82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller R. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?. Am Econ Rev 71: 421–436

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard Qi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qi, H., Liu, S. & Wu, C. On the calibration of structural credit spread models. Ann Finance 5, 189–208 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-008-0097-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-008-0097-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation