Abstract
Droplet-based microfluidic technologies have proved themselves to be of significant utility in the performance of high-throughput chemical and biological experiments. By encapsulating and isolating reagents within femtoliter–nanoliter droplet, millions of (bio) chemical reactions can be processed in a parallel fashion and on ultra-short timescales. Recent applications of such technologies to genetic analysis have suggested significant utility in low-cost, efficient and rapid workflows for DNA amplification, rare mutation detection, antibody screening and next-generation sequencing. To this end, we describe and highlight some of the most interesting recent developments and applications of droplet-based microfluidics in the broad area of nucleic acid analysis. In addition, we also present a cursory description of some of the most essential functional components, which allow the creation of integrated and complex workflows based on flowing streams of droplets.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Emulsions (or collections of isolated droplets surrounded by a continuous and immiscible carrier fluid) have long been used in chemical and biological experimentation, with the millions of contained droplets serving as isolated vessels in which reactions or assays may be performed (Fig. 1a) (Griffiths and Tawfik 2006). The use of bulk shear forces, although efficient in making large numbers of droplets on short timescales, generates polydisperse droplet populations that prohibit quantitative experimentation (Huebner et al. 2007; Pekin et al. 2011; Juul et al. 2012). Conversely, and as will be shown subsequently, flow-based microfluidic systems can be used to generate similarly large numbers of droplets, but with an unprecedented degree of control over droplet size. These features combined with the facility to adjust the chemical or biological payload at will make microfluidic droplets highly promising vehicles for large-scale biological experimentation.
An important application of droplet-based microfluidic systems is in the analysis of nucleic acids. Indeed, recent developments have seen the establishment of robust and high-throughput genotyping assays and expression analysis at the single-cell level (Macosko et al. 2015; Zeng et al. 2010; Turchaninova et al. 2013; Eastburn et al. 2013). A key feature in this respect is the ability to perform rapid DNA amplification (via the polymerase chain reaction or PCR) within millions of individual droplets in a parallel fashion (Tewhey et al. 2009; Markey et al. 2010; Hindson et al. 2011). Droplet-based PCR involves the partitioning of a large reaction volume into millions of smaller volumes, which statistically will either be empty or will contain a single copy of target DNA. Subsequent thermal cycling of all droplets within a sample yields signal only in droplets that originally contained DNA. Accordingly, quantitation is ensured via a simple process of counting. This feature combined with reduced reagent consumption and efficient heat transfer, engenders a range of experiments (such as rare mutation detection and bias-free amplification) that are simply not possible in other formats (Kalinina et al. 1997). The realisation of formats for droplet-based PCR (Griffiths and Tawfik 2006; Williams et al. 2006; Nakano et al. 2003) has had an immense impact on single-molecule PCR (Kumaresan et al. 2008; Diehl et al. 2006) and has already become a critical component of next-generation sequencing technologies (White et al. 2009; Margulies et al. 2005). At a basic level, the utility of droplet-based microfluidic systems in biological experimentation stems from the ability to control and manipulate droplets in a passive, reproducible and rapid fashion. Indeed, and unsurprisingly, such platforms have also been used to good effect in many other applications, including nanomaterial synthesis (Lignos et al. 2016), kinetic analysis (Lignos et al. 2015; Bui et al. 2011), drug delivery (Xu et al. 2009), high-throughput screening (Sjostrom et al. 2013) and single-cell analysis (Brouzes et al. 2009).
In the current review, we aim to survey recent developments in the use of droplet-based microfluidics for nucleic acid analysis, first highlighting key areas where such microfluidic tools have had significant effect and secondly proposing related applications where microfluidic technologies may have impact in the short to medium term. We also note that although essential background knowledge, such as the manner in which droplets are formed and manipulated, will be introduced, more detailed and comprehensive analyses of droplet-based microfluidic systems can be found elsewhere (Niu and deMello 2012; Oh et al. 2012; Choi et al. 2012; Baroud et al. 2010; Kelly et al. 2007; Shembekar et al. 2016; Price and Paegel 2016; Collins et al. 2015).
2 Droplet-based microfluidics
2.1 Droplet generation and unit operations
Emulsions formed using bulk shear forces on the macroscale have long been used to good effect in areas such as polymer chemistry (Ugelstad et al. 1973), cosmetic formulations (Linn and West 1989) and complex food systems (Garti 1997). Despite their utility, the challenges associated with controlling droplet size, composition and size distributions are immense, making their use in quantitative experimentation demanding. Conversely, droplets (with volumes ranging from femtoliters to nanoliters) can be generated in a variety of ways within microfluidic systems. Critically, passive strategies that leverage geometrical variations of fluidic structures can be used to transform arbitrary volumes of fluid into defined sub-nanoliter droplets at kHz to MHz rates (Shim et al. 2013).
At a simple level, the most common strategies for droplet production involve the use of cross-flow structures (T-junctions) (Thorsen et al. 2001), flow-focusing geometries (Anna et al. 2003), co-flow structures (Umbanhowar et al. 2000; Cramer et al. 2004) and step emulsification (Sugiura et al. 2001; Kobayashi et al. 2005). In planar, chip-based systems immiscible aqueous and oil streams confined within microfluidic channels are brought together via external pressure (typically using syringe or pressure pumps),Footnote 1 with droplets (or plugs) being formed at the point of confluence. Although the droplet generation mechanism is quite different in each these geometries, all involve the establishment of an interface between co-flowing, immiscible fluids, followed by self-segregation of one of the fluids into droplets that are surrounded by the other fluid. Interestingly, variations on the above strategies have been used to good effect (Ding et al. 2014; Dangla et al. 2013). For example, Dangla et al. (2013) exploited gradients of confinement to realise highly robust droplet formation (Fig. 1b). Using this method, droplets are formed due to curvature imbalance along the interface, without the need for shear associated with continuous phase flow. This means that droplet size is primarily determined by the gradient geometry and is insensitive to fluid properties. Unsurprisingly, such a “pump-free” droplet generation method (Fig. 1b) has wide ranging utility and potential in point-of-care or point-of-use applications.
Control of droplet size is of obvious importance when performing quantitative experiments; however, the ability to “load” droplets with multiple reagents at user-defined concentrations is even more critical. Introduction of the dispersed phase through a branched inlet channel allows for the direct combination of multiple laminar streams just prior to droplet formation (Song et al. 2003), with the relative concentration of each reagent being defined by the associated volumetric flow-rate ratios (Guo et al. 2012). Notably, this strategy has been effective in creating droplet barcodes, in which co-encapsulation of multiple fluorophores spectrally encodes droplets and yields uniquely identifiable signatures (Ji et al. 2011; Gerver et al. 2012). The passive production of droplets is simple, quick and efficient, however, limited in its ability to independently manipulate droplets in a dynamic and bespoke manner. In this respect, active methods show clear utility in creating user-defined droplets in a “droplet-on-demand” fashion. Common actuating sources for such purposes include pneumatic pressure (Unger et al. 2000; Willaime et al. 2006; Zeng et al. 2009), mechanical forces (Kim et al. 2012), electrical fields (Link et al. 2006), magnetic fields (Vekselman et al. 2015), acoustic waves (Collins et al. 2013), optical traps (Lorenz et al. 2006) and thermal gradients (Baroud et al. 2007). For example, Rane et al. (2015) used a pneumatic valve-based architecture to assemble combinational populations of enzyme-substrate droplets. Specifically, 650 unique combinations were programmed and generated in a droplet train in a highly reproducible manner. However, it should be remembered that active methods typically produce droplets at low generation frequencies and require the use of complex control equipment. Accordingly, the choice of droplet generation method should be made on the basis of the specific experimental requirements.
Subsequent to their generation, droplets need to be manipulated in ways that mimic the standard analytical procedures used on the bench top. Fortunately, a wide range of (both passive and active) functional components have been presented for operations that include droplet merging (Niu et al. 2008; Deng et al. 2013; Mazutis and Griffiths 2012; Akartuna et al. 2015), dilution (Niu et al. 2011; Sun and Vanapalli 2013), dosing (Abate et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2008), splitting (Link et al. 2004; Gao et al. 2016), pairing (Ahn et al. 2011; Bai et al. 2010), sorting (Baret et al. 2009; Nam et al. 2012; Cao et al. 2013), trapping/releasing (Wang et al. 2010; Korczyk et al. 2013; Courtney et al. 2017), counting (Boybay et al. 2013; Yesiloz et al. 2015; Kim et al. 2012) and incubation (Huebner et al. 2009; Wen et al. 2015). An instructive example in this respect was reported by Hatch et al. (2011), who used successive bifurcations to split single droplets into 256 daughter droplets in a rapid and passive fashion (Fig. 1c). Using such a strategy, over one million droplets (that are either empty or contain one copy of target DNA) could be generated in 2–7 min. Droplet populations formed in this manner could be subsequently packed into on-chip storage chambers and thermally cycled for digital PCR analysis (Hatch et al. 2011). Conversely, Eastburn et al. (2013) reported a powerful and robust (active) method, termed picoinjection, which utilises a pressurised microchannel and periodic electric field to inject a controlled volume of reagent into a moving droplet. Picoinjection has proved to be immensely useful in a range of complex, droplet-based assays, being compatible with common biological reagents such as nucleic acids and enzymes.
The ability to link functional components within integrated and sequential workflows has been a key reason why droplet-based microfluidic systems have proved so advantageous in biological experimentation (Brouzes et al. 2009; Pan et al. 2011; Cho et al. 2013). Put simply, complex chemical and biological assays can be performed in a rapid and efficient manner. In this respect, Lan et al. (2016) assembled an elaborate workflow that leverages short-read DNA sequencing to obtain long and accurate sequence reads (Fig. 2a). Central to this process was the use of unique barcodes to label long-DNA molecules, thus allowing short-reads of breakage fragments to be accurately reassembled. Functional operations within such a workflow included droplet generation, thermal cycling, splitting, pairing/merging, incubation, triple-droplet pairing/merging, splitting, pinched-flow size sorting, and secondary thermal cycling. Significantly, such an approach enables accurate sequencing up to 10 kb, and opens up new opportunities for the identification of rare mutations inaccessible to conventional sequencing.
2.2 Droplet stability
In most situations, it is desirable that droplets maintain their size and composition over extended periods of time. Long-term stability of droplets is almost exclusively facilitated by the use of appropriate surfactants, which act to inhibit droplet coalescence by stabilising the interface between the immiscible phases. Surfactant molecules are normally mixed into the continuous phase, and upon contact with the discrete phase self-organise at the interface.
An excellent review of droplet surfactants can be found elsewhere (Baret 2012), providing a comprehensive discussion of surfactant selection. However, in the current context, some key issues are worthy of discussion. First, although many oils and organic solvents can be used as carrier fluids in droplet-based microfluidic systems, when performing nucleic acid assays choices are somewhat restricted due to biocompatibility requirements and the need to exclude biological impurities. Mineral oils and perfluorinated oils (such as HFE-7500, FC-40 and FC-70) are most two frequently used. When using mineral oils droplets can be efficiently stabilised by Span 80 (sorbitan monooleate) and Abil EM 90 (a non-ionic, silicone-based emulsifier) (Williams et al. 2006; Schütze et al. 2011; Bian et al. 2015). Nevertheless, due to the prevalence of fluorinated oils as carrier fluids (because of their excellent biocompatibility and high gas permeabilities), fluorosurfactants (perfluoropolyethers containing hydrophilic head groups), such as perfluoropolyether-polyethylenoxide triblock copolymers, have proved to offer exceptional long-term stabilisation of droplets in a range of situations. Second, droplet size plays a critical role in emulsion stability, with the existence of thermodynamically and kinetically stable regions with respect to droplet radii (Kabalnov 2001). Indeed, although fluorosurfactants can stabilise droplets (with diameters on the tens of microns scale) for weeks at room temperature (Holtze et al. 2008), unless absolutely essential droplets should be processed and assayed on the shortest appropriate timescales. Put simply, when droplets are in close proximity for long periods of time (e.g. when packed in an incubation chamber) undesirable mass transfer between droplets will occur to some extent due to phenomena such as Ostwald ripening, phase partitioning, bilayer diffusion or micelle-mediated transport (Webster and Cates 1998; Calderó et al. 1998; Skhiri et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2012; Gruner et al. 2015; Debon et al. 2015). That said, controlled molecular transport between droplets can in fact open up new and unexpected opportunities (Gruner et al. 2016). In the current context, recent studies suggest that additives (such as Bovine Serum Albumin) can decrease diffusion rates by forming barrier layers, and can also maintain high enzymatic activities (when performing droplet PCR) through competitive adsorption on surfactant layers (Gruner et al. 2015; Courtois et al. 2009; Zhang and Xing 2007). It should also be noted that although mineral and fluorinated oils are both compatible with droplet PCR, their physical and chemical differences define particular limitations and advantages. These are compared and summarised in Table 1. Finally, it must not be forgotten that control of channel surface properties is critical in ensuring efficient generation and processing of droplets (Bashir et al. 2014). Although more detailed discussions of this issue can be found elsewhere (Debon et al. 2015), it is necessary for channels made from hydrophilic materials (such as glass) to made hydrophobic through silanisation and typical for naturally hydrophobic surfaces (such as PDMS and PMMA) to be treated with fluoroalkylsilanes prior to experimentation (Köster et al. 2008).
3 Droplets and next-generation sequencing
3.1 Next-generation sequencing
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a commonly used umbrella term describing ultra-high-throughput sequencing methods (Behjati and Tarpey 2013). Such methods allow nucleic acid sequencing at rates of thousands of gigabases per week and at a cost of less than a dollar per gigabase, and have revolutionised genetic and genomic science.
Several distinct NGS platforms are commercially available (such as those offered by Illumina, Roche and Life Technologies). Although metrics such as cost per run, cost per base, error rate and throughput are important when evaluating performance, the read length and number of reads per run are perhaps most useful when judging sequencing capacity (Levy and Myers 2016). Since 2012, an annual comparison of available sequencing platforms (based on these two factors) has been presented by Lex Nederbragt at the University of Oslo, with data from July 2016 illustrated in Fig. 2b (Nederbragt 2016). Currently, Illumina’s Hiseq platforms lead the field in terms of throughput and unsurprisingly dominate the sequencer market share. That said, most mainstream NGS systems make use of short-read lengths, which yields limitations in the resolution of structural mutations and ability to perform de novo sequencing (Treangen and Salzberg 2012). Accordingly, NGS technologies capable of long reads (such as those provided by Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore) are becomingly increasingly important, although still in the early stages of development. Finally, it should be noted that extended read lengths can be accessed indirectly via synthetic long-read (SLR) sequencing methods, which leverage short-read sequencing data to generate synthetic long reads via partitioning, label indexing and remapping techniques (Kuleshov et al. 2014). SLR methods are compatible with existing short-read sequencing platforms and have already shown utility in the recovery of missing sequences, haplotype phasing and transcriptome analysis (Li et al. 2015; Amini et al. 2014; Tilgner et al. 2015).
3.2 Droplet partitioning
A number of NGS methods make use of microtiter plates to partition samples (Amini et al. 2014; Adey et al. 2014). For example, haplotype determination can be achieved by dilution of samples into 384-well plates prior to sequencing library preparation (Fig. 2c) (Kuleshov et al. 2014). A key feature of “dilution haplotyping” is the fact that the low concentration of molecules per partition reduces the probability that a contained DNA molecule has an overlapping sequence with another. Unfortunately, dilution methods based on microtiter plates are instrumentally complex and limited in their partitioning capacity. To address these limitations, researchers from 10X Genomics and Stanford University have recently transformed haplotyping analysis (and many other applications) by using droplet-based microfluidics to achieve large-scale partitioning in a rapid and efficient manner (Zheng et al. 2016a). Specifically, a double-cross-junction was used to construct phased sequencing libraries from ng inputs of high molecular weight DNA. Hydrogel beads can then be used as barcode delivery reagents, to allow the controlled loading of individual barcodes into droplet partitions. This core technology platform has since been refined to enable the generation and analysis of more than one million droplet partitions using over four million barcodes and the integrated sequencing of up to 104 (single) cells (Fig. 2c).
The transition from microtiter plate to droplet-based formats has also impacted high-throughput cellular assays. For example, DeKosky et al. (2013) recently developed a method able to preserve heavy-chain (VH) and light-chain (VL) antibody pairing information when performing high-throughput immune repertoire sequencing. The authors were able to partition single B cells into spatially isolated compartments, whilst at the same time inserting poly(dT) magnetic beads as barcodes. Cells could be lysed, with mRNA captured on the magnetic beads and then reverse transcription and emulsion VH–VL linkage PCR performed. After this complex sequence of operations, linked transcripts were finally subjected to NGS. Initially, four PDMS slides each containing 170,000 wells (with each well having a volume of 125 pL) were designed to concurrently accommodate and process 68,000 B cells (with a 95% probability of there being only one cell per well). In each experimental run, over 50,000 single B cells could be deposited and analysed. Subsequently, the same team replaced the well-based strategy with a droplet-based microfluidic system (DeKosky et al. 2014). This direct upgrade enabled the high-throughput processing of over one million single B cells per experiment. The schematic procedures for both workflows are shown in Fig. 3.
3.3 Droplet-based nucleic acid amplification
Amplification is a prerequisite for the vast majority of nucleic acid assays. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the first in vitro nucleic acid amplification technique, was introduced by Mullis et al. (1986) over three decades ago, and is still to this day the preferred approach for most amplification-involved procedures. Conventional PCR is performed using bulk thermal cyclers, where Peltier effect thermoelectric heating is used convert electrical energy into a temperature gradient (Bell 2008). Almost all conventional thermal cyclers possess large thermal masses, which result in high power requirements and relatively slow heating and cooling rates. Unsurprisingly, a large number of microfluidic approaches have been developed for PCR over the past 20 years to address these limitations. Although, highly successful in allowing amplification to be performed in a rapid and efficient manner (Woolley et al. 1996; Kopp et al. 1998; Easley et al. 2006), batch and continuous flow approaches do not drastically change how PCR is used by experimentalists to generate biological information. Conversely, the adoption of droplet-based formats for PCR over the recent years has begun to transform the application and utility of PCR in complex biological experiments (Williams et al. 2006; Diehl et al. 2006). In addition to obvious advantages, such as reduced reaction times, minimal sample consumption and contamination-free operation, other intriguing features such as massively parallel operation, high amplification sensitivities and reduced amplification bias have begun to fundamentally change how biologists view and use the reaction (Tewhey et al. 2009; White et al. 2009; Nishikawa et al. 2015).
Droplet-based PCR can be carried out in various microfluidic formats, which are broadly categorised as being either on-chip or off-chip (Kiss et al. 2008). For example, early studies by Schaerli et al. (2009) used a radial microfluidic device, containing concentric temperature zones, to perform single-copy amplification in 160 pL-volume droplets (Fig. 4A). Batch on-chip microfluidic systems can be created by fabricating integrated chambers that trap or hold large numbers of droplets subsequent to their production. As previously described, Hatch et al. (2011) showed an elegant example of such a format, where over a million droplets containing PCR mix were packed into a microfluidic chamber for both thermal cycling and real-time product detection. Interestingly, the majority of droplet-based PCR assays have incorporated off-chip amplification, whereby PCR droplets are generated on-chip using standard protocols and then collected and amplified in standard PCR reaction tubes. Such an approach is interesting since it leverages the ability of microfluidics to generate large numbers of defined droplets on short timescales and the convenience of using commercial formats or instruments for thermal cycling [rather than more involved approaches to thermal control (Sgro et al. 2007) (Hettiarachchi et al. 2012)]. The interested reader is directed to Table 2, which summarises representative droplet-based PCR studies over the past decade.
It should be remembered that nucleic acid amplification is not limited to PCR, with a large number of alternative amplification methods being developed in the intervening years (Fakruddin et al. 2013). These include the ligase chain reaction (LCR) and isothermal amplification methods such as rolling circle amplification (RCA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), helicase-dependent amplification (HDA), ramification amplification method (RAM), multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Almost all of these basic techniques have been successfully transferred to droplet-based microfluidic formats (Zanoli and Spoto 2012). Isothermal amplifications are particularly attractive since they are characterised by short reaction time and require only simple thermal control architectures. These features suggest significant potential for use in point-of-care diagnostic applications. For example, LAMP has been shown to be rapid, accurate, and cost-effective in the diagnosis of infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), malaria and African trypanosomiasis (Mori and Notomi 2009; Poon et al. 2004; Surabattula et al. 2013; Njiru et al. 2008). Critically, LAMP analysis can be performed simply by visual inspection or through the use of a smartphone camera (Tomita et al. 2008; Damhorst et al. 2015). Recently, Rane et al. (2015) demonstrated an integrated device for digital LAMP, combining droplet generation, incubation (amplification) and real-time detection. Using such an approach, more than one million droplets could be processed in less than 2 h in a continuous manner.
4 One drop at a time: high-throughput nucleic acid assays
4.1 Single-molecule genomic screening
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is quite possibly the most important microfluidic technology to have been commercialised in recent years (Fig. 4b) (Hindson et al. 2011), and refines the concept of digital PCR (dPCR) proposed in the late 1990s (Vogelstein and Kinzler 1999). Unlike conventional quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods, dPCR achieves quantitation by portioning a large sample volume into many smaller volumes that statistically contain no more than one copy of target DNA. dPCR is particularly robust for the detection of rare nucleic acid samples, the investigation of rare mutations in complex backgrounds and the identification of small differences in expression levels. That said, early embodiments dPCR were limited by the method of sample partitioning, which often involved the use of microtiter plates (Vogelstein and Kinzler 1999), bulk emulsions (using beads, emulsion, amplification and magnetics - BEAMing) (Dressman et al. 2003) or microfluidic chamber arrays (Ottesen et al. 2006). Hindson et al. (2013) have compared ddPCR with qPCR in the microRNA quantification, with results indicating that ddPCR yields significantly greater precision and improved “day-to-day reproducibility” over qPCR. Such superior metrics suggest that ddPCR will continue to play an important role in molecular diagnostics of genetic diseases (Debrand et al. 2015), cancers (Mehrian-Shai et al. 2016; Watanabe et al. 2015), infectious diseases (Bian et al. 2015; Trypsteen et al. 2016) and prenatal diagnosis (Orhant et al. 2016). For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is an important target for many cancer therapies, with the status of the EGFR mutation being closely related to the therapeutic effect of EGFR inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Lièvre et al. 2006; Gazdar 2009). Siravegna et al. (2015) comprehensively combined BEAMing, ddPCR, NGS and bioinformatics analyses to genotype colorectal cancers and dynamically monitor clonal evolution during treatment with the EGFR-specific antibodies Cetuximab and Panitumumab. Results revealed the colorectal tumour genome adapts dynamically to intermittent drug schedules, and provides a molecular explanation for the efficacy of “rechallenge therapies” based on the EGFR blockade. Such a methodology has significant implications for the development of personalised cancer treatments and the dynamic monitoring of disease progression and response to therapy. Put simply, it eliminates the difficulties associated with repeated sample acquisition, and removes temporal and spatial bias in sample selection.
ddPCR allows for the simultaneous detection of multiple targets through the use of multi-colour detection schemes, with further expansion of target numbers being achieved by varying parameters that control PCR efficiency (Zhong et al. 2011). Accordingly, in multiplex ddPCR, multiple mutations can be detected in a single experiment; a feature particularly valuable when assaying clinical samples (Taly et al. 2013). Much work has recently focused on improving ddPCR, in terms of detection sensitivity (Miotke et al. 2014) and sample volume limitation (Petriv et al. 2014), but there is little doubt that ddPCR is rapidly becoming a “standard” component in highly sensitive genomic screening.
4.2 Single-cell genomic and transcriptomic investigations
Cells are the elementary structural, functional, and biological units in living organisms, with the physiological functions of multicellular organisms being realised through individual cells. It is widely acknowledged that a seemingly homogeneous cell population will differ significantly in terms of size, genetic variants and expression patterns at single-cell level, resulting from the inherent stochasticity of biological processes (Elowitz et al. 2002) and stimulation by the external microenvironment (Liberali et al. 2015). Accordingly, the ability to identify cell-to-cell variations within a given population is critical in understanding clonal evolution in cancer (Greaves and Maley 2012), immune dysfunction (Proserpio and Mahata 2016) and somatic mutations (Xu et al. 2012). In this respect, single-cell genomics aims to enrich our understanding of genetics by engendering the study of genomes at the cellular level.
A technical prerequisite for DNA or RNA sequencing of single cells is the efficient physical isolation of large numbers (>103) of discrete cells, in a manner that allows each cell to be interrogated on an individual basis (Gawad et al. 2016). Normally, cells obtained from blood or solid tissues are processed (via methods such as enzymatic dissociation, density gradient centrifugation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting) to yield a single-cell suspension, which is then delivered into the microfluidic system. Cell isolation in microfluidic systems can be used most easily achieved using traps, droplets or micromechanical valves. For example, the commercially available Fluidigm C1 platform provides an integrated and automated solution for single-cell genomics, leveraging control of pneumatic valves (that deflect under pressure to disrupt fluid flow within a microchannel) to perform single-cell capture, lysis, mRNA release, RT-PCR and cDNA amplification. Such an approach allows the parallel analyse up to 800 cells in an automated fashion.
Two recent studies describing single-cell RNA sequencing methods using droplet-based microfluidics [termed Drop-seq (Macosko et al. 2015) and InDrop (Klein et al. 2015)] have attracted significant attention in the biological community due to their ability to barcode RNA and analyse mRNA transcripts in an efficient, cost-effective and high-throughput fashion (Fig. 5). Unsurprisingly, these two approaches share much similarity in methodology, since they exploit droplet-based tools developed in the Weitz laboratory at Harvard University. Both utilise microfluidics to load single cells and single microbeads (containing a unique barcode) together with lysis buffer into droplets. Subsequently, released mRNAs from a given cell are labelled with a unique code prior to droplet breakup and pool amplification. mRNAs are converted to cDNAs by RT-PCR, followed by library preparation, sequencing and data analysis. Critically, all sequencing data, though carried out in batch, can be traced back to its “cell-of-origin” and “gene-of-origin”. The Drop-seq method uses solid microparticles, with oligonucleotide codes covalently linked to the particle surface, whilst InDrop technology uses hydrogel beads, with code release being driven by UV activation. For the interested reader, a more detailed comparison of the biochemical procedures (including transcript coverage) can be found elsewhere (Picelli 2016). That said, from a technical perspective, some comment on co-encapsulation efficiencies is worthwhile. Random (passive) loading of beads, cells and DNA molecules into droplets obeys Poisson statistics under normal circumstances (Collins et al. 2015). To ensure a >95% probability that a given droplet contains no more than one cell, the average occupancy should not be larger than 0.1 cells per droplets. Under such conditions, most droplets (90.5%) will be empty, with 9% containing a single cell. Accordingly, both Drop-seq and InDrop utilise dilute cell suspensions to ensure single-cell encapsulation, whilst leveraging the ability of microfluidic droplet generators to make droplets at high speed. Interestingly, the InDrop method utilises close-packed ordering (Abate et al. 2009) to beat Poisson constraints, with almost 100% droplets receiving gel beads, and over 90% of cell-loaded droplets containing exactly one cell and one bead. This approach involves the use of close packed, deformable particles to allow insertion of a controllable number of particles into every droplet. It should also be noted that the basic Drop-seq methodology could in future make use of inertial focusing and ordering to drastically increase the number of droplets containing a single cell and bead (Martel and Toner 2014). Considering current co-encapsulation efficiencies, the InDrop methodology should be well-suited for clinical applications, where cell availability is often limited. Interestingly, 10X Genomics have recently tested single-cell RNA-seq on their GemCode platform using similar workflows, and reported a cell capture efficiency of ~50% and analysis of eight samples in parallel (Zheng et al. 2016b).
Besides global single-cell RNA-seq, the principle of bead-barcoding and droplet-isolation has also used for targeted transcriptomic sequencing. As noted, DeKosky et al. (2013, 2014) sequenced immune receptor repertoires with the preservation of pairing information (between heavy and light-chain antibodies). These chains contain variable domains and their pairing relationship controls cellular functionality. Compared to Drop-seq, an additional step of re-emulsifying mRNA-captured beads to perform RT-PCR and linkage PCR is necessary. In this respect, the authors have recently published a detailed protocol of the entire workflow (McDaniel et al. 2016).
The encapsulation and isolation of single cells in a drop-by-drop fashion has opened up new opportunities for cost-effective and ultra-high-throughput single-cell genetic studies in applications such as whole-genome amplification (Fu et al. 2015), chromatin profiling (Rotem et al. 2015) and PCR-activated cell sorting (Eastburn et al. 2014), with microfluidically produced droplets playing a key role. Finally, it is worth noting that thermosensitive hydrogel droplets are interesting vehicles for novel experimentation (Leng et al. 2010; Kumachev et al. 2011). For example, hydrogel droplets can be generated in oil at elevated temperatures and cooled to form gel particles downstream. Such gel particles can be washed and handled in aqueous buffer, allowing molecular exchange of substances through diffusion. Hence, unlike conventional aqueous droplets that require sophisticated operations to dose or remove reagents, gel droplets may be processed by immersion in appropriate media or dialysate. This innovation has opened up new possibilities for designing highly complex biological workflows in genetic analysis (Novak et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2012; Geng et al. 2014).
5 Outlook
Over the past decade, the development of droplet-based microfluidic technologies has occurred at a startling pace, with a focus on establishing of functional operational components (for droplet processing) and discovering applications where the features of such systems may be used to the best effect. Based on their ability to perform complex experimental workflows in a robust fashion, the next decade will undoubtedly see the commercialisation of many platforms for defined biological applications, delivering microfluidics not only to research laboratories, but also to hospitals, clinics and health NGOs. New functions and opportunities will continue to emerge, but research efforts will also continue to focus on improving and integrating existing modules to deliver reliable solutions. To finish, we speculate on two (seemingly dissimilar) developments that may occur over the short-medium term.
5.1 Portable droplet-based microfluidics for point-of-care diagnostics
The demand for rapid, accurate, inexpensive and convenient point-of-care (PoC) systems for infectious disease diagnostics and wellness monitoring is significant. Ideal diagnostics should be both simple in their structure and portable, whilst ensuring that predefined questions can be answered in a quantitative, low-cost and rapid manner. Whilst droplet-based microfluidic systems offer a direct route to such quantitative diagnostics, their implementation for PoC nucleic acid analysis is far from simple. For example, fluid manipulation is a key concern in formats, which need to be cheap, robust and small. In this respect, syringe pump-free systems [which utilise manual droplet generation (Dangla et al. 2013) or centrifugal microfluidics (Schuler et al. 2015)] are particularly interesting. Moreover, isothermal amplification methods will be preferable to more traditional thermocycling techniques (Zanoli and Spoto 2012). To this end, Schuler et al. (2015) recently demonstrated a system that utilises centrifugal step droplet generation, and is thus pump- and tubing-free (Fig. 4c). Using such an approach, the authors were able to perform isothermal ddPRA on-chip and quantify L. monocytogene DNA in food samples, reducing the time-to-result by four-fold when compared to the gold-standard tests. Moreover, Cao et al. (2016) showed a significant enhancement of fluid control in centrifugal microfluidics by introducing a novel two degrees of freedom (2-DoF) centrifugal microfluidic platform, which allows complex fluidic control in a direct manner, requiring no external components. Such an advance suggests new possibilities for the use of centrifugal microfluidics in PoC applications.
5.2 Large-scale integration to answer complex or unknown questions
Whilst PoC devices provide maximum accessibility to end-users, droplet-based microfluidic technologies have shown their true mettle in addressing comprehensive and complex biological questions. Although, and as we have seen, such systems have allowed experiments inaccessible on the macroscale to be performed in an automated and integrated manner, we have only scratched the surface in terms of their ultimate potential. For example, droplet-based platforms have already been integrated with “machine learning” algorithms to allow the intelligent synthesis of a range of high quality nanomaterials for application in display and photovoltaic technologies (Maceiczyk and deMello 2014; Reizman and Jensen 2016). Such approaches leverage the ability of microfluidic systems to perform the chemistry/biology in an efficient manner and real-time detection to extract information on ms timescales. Machining learning methods will almost certainly impact biology in a similar way within the short term. As control architecture is refined, the sophisticated operations, shown for example in Fig. 2a, will no longer be the privilege of a few expert microfluidic laboratories, and droplet-based microfluidics will quickly become a basic tool used by any experimental scientist. Even though significant successes in system automation have been made (such as the Fluidigm C1 platform), the automated and large-scale control of droplet networks integrating multiple functional components remains a daunting challenge, requiring the robust understanding and harnessing of nonlinear and multi-phase fluid dynamics. In this respect, valuable progress has already been made in areas such as bubble logic (Prakash and Gershenfeld 2007), control logic (Weaver et al. 2010) and electric circuit analogy (Oh et al. 2012). Moreover, a recent study describing the “random design” of microfluidic systems is of particular interest (Wang et al. 2016). In this approach, a library of thousands of random microfluidic chip designs was synthesised. The behaviour of each design was then simulated using finite element analysis, with users able to access structures suited to given tasks. We anticipate this type of interaction could form the basis of future microfluidic platform development. Indeed, through the collection and assimilation of user-generated data, machine-learning algorithms will allow the creation of entirely new microfluidic tools. Unsurprisingly, we feel that the future of droplet-based microfluidics is an exciting one.
Notes
For the systems described herein, the discrete (droplet) phase is aqueous in nature and surrounded by an immiscible (oil-based) carrier phase. That said, the only requirements for establishing robust droplet flows are that the continuous phase should preferentially wet the channel surface and the surface tension at the fluid/fluid interface should be sufficiently high to avoid destruction of droplets by shear.
Abbreviations
- B cell:
-
B lymphocytes
- bp:
-
Base pair
- BSA:
-
Bovine serum albumin
- Ca:
-
Capillary number, in formula Ca = ηV/γ
- cDNA:
-
Complementary DNA
- C–F bond:
-
Carbon–fluorine bond
- C–H bond:
-
Carbon–hydrogen bond
- ddPCR:
-
Droplet digital PCR
- ddPRA:
-
Droplet digital PRA
- DNA:
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- dNTP:
-
Deoxynucleotide
- DoF:
-
Degree of freedom
- dPCR:
-
Digital PCR
- DTT:
-
Dithiothreitol
- E. coli:
-
Escherichia coli
- EDTA:
-
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- EGFR:
-
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- HDA:
-
Helicase-dependent amplification
- L. monocytogene:
-
Listeria monocytogene
- LAMP:
-
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification
- LCR:
-
Ligase chain reaction
- MDA:
-
Multiple displacement amplification
- MDA:
-
Multiple displacement amplification
- MMLV RT:
-
Moloney murine leukaemia virus reverse transcriptase
- mRNA:
-
Messenger RNA
- NASBA:
-
Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification
- NGO:
-
Non-governmental organisation
- NGS:
-
Next-generation sequencing
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- PDMS:
-
Polydimethylsiloxane
- PFO:
-
Perfluorooctanol
- PM:
-
Polymerase
- PMMA:
-
Poly(methyl methacrylate)
- PoC:
-
Point-of-care
- Poly(dT):
-
Poly(deoxythymidylic)
- qPCR:
-
Real-time PCR
- RAM:
-
Ramification amplification method
- RCA:
-
Rolling circle amplification
- RNA:
-
Ribonucleic acid
- RNA-seq:
-
RNA sequence analysis
- RPA:
-
Recombinase polymerase amplification
- RT-PCR:
-
Reverse-transcription PCR
- SARS:
-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
- SLR:
-
Synthetic long-read
- ssDNA:
-
Single-stranded DNA
- STAMPs:
-
Single-cell transcriptomes attached to microparticles
- UMI:
-
Unique molecular identifier
- UV:
-
Ultraviolet
- V:
-
Velocity of the continuous phase
- VH:
-
Heavy-chain
- VL:
-
Light-chain
- γ:
-
Interfacial tension
- η:
-
Viscosity of the continuous phase
References
Abate AR, Chen C-H, Agresti JJ, Weitz DA (2009) Beating Poisson encapsulation statistics using close-packed ordering. Lab Chip 9:2628–2631
Abate AR, Hung T, Mary P, Agresti JJ, Weitz DA (2010) High-throughput injection with microfluidics using picoinjectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:19163–19166
Adey A, Kitzman JO, Burton JN, Daza R, Kumar A, Christiansen L, Ronaghi M, Amini S, Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ, Shendure J (2014) In vitro, long-range sequence information for de novo genome assembly via transposase contiguity. Genome Res 24:2041–2049
Ahn B, Lee K, Lee H, Panchapakesan R, Oh KW (2011) Parallel synchronization of two trains of droplets using a railroad-like channel network. Lab Chip 11:3956–3962
Akartuna I, Aubrecht DM, Kodger TE, Weitz DA (2015) Chemically induced coalescence in droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 15:1140–1144
Amini S, Pushkarev D, Christiansen L, Kostem E, Royce T, Turk C, Pignatelli N, Adey A, Kitzman JO, Vijayan K, Ronaghi M, Shendure J, Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ (2014) Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguity-preserving transposition and combinatorial indexing. Nat Genet 46:1343–1349
Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82:364–366
Bai Y, He X, Liu D, Patil SN, Bratton D, Huebner A, Hollfelder F, Abell C, Huck WTS (2010) A double droplet trap system for studying mass transport across a droplet-droplet interface. Lab Chip 10:1281–1285
Baret J-C (2012) Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 12:422–433
Baret J-C, Miller OJ, Taly V, Ryckelynck M, El-Harrak A, Frenz L, Rick C, Samuels ML, Hutchison JB, Agresti JJ, Link DR, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD (2009) Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. Lab Chip 9:1850–1858
Baroud CN, Delville J-P, Gallaire F, Wunenburger R (2007) Thermocapillary valve for droplet production and sorting. Phys Rev E 75:46302
Baroud CN, Gallaire F, Dangla R (2010) Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 10:2032
Bashir S, i Solvas XC, Bashir M, Rees JM, Zimmerman WBJ (2014) Dynamic wetting in microfluidic droplet formation. BioChip J 8:122–128
Behjati S, Tarpey PS (2013) What is next generation sequencing? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 98:236–238
Bell LE (2008) Cooling, heating, generating power, and recovering waste heat with thermoelectric systems. Science 321:1457–1461
Bian X, Jing F, Li G, Fan X, Jia C, Zhou H, Jin Q, Zhao J (2015) A microfluidic droplet digital PCR for simultaneous detection of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157 and Listeria monocytogenes. Biosens Bioelectron 74:770–777
Boybay MS, Jiao A, Glawdel T, Ren CL (2013) Microwave sensing and heating of individual droplets in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 13:3840–3846
Brouzes E, Medkova M, Savenelli N, Marran D, Twardowski M, Hutchison JB, Rothberg JM, Link DR, Perrimon N, Samuels ML (2009) Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:14195–14200
Bui M-PN, Li CA, Han KN, Choo J, Lee EK, Seong GH (2011) Enzyme kinetic measurements using a droplet-based microfluidic system with a concentration gradient. Anal Chem 83:1603–1608
Calderó G, García-Celma MJ, Solans C, Stébé MJ, Ravey JC, Rocca S, Pons R (1998) Diffusion from hydrogenated and fluorinated gel−emulsion mixtures. Langmuir 14:1580–1585
Cao Z, Chen F, Bao N, He H, Xu P, Jana S, Jung S, Lian H, Lu C (2013) Droplet sorting based on the number of encapsulated particles using a solenoid valve. Lab Chip 13:171–178
Cao X, de Mello AJ, Elvira KS (2016) Enhanced versatility of fluid control in centrifugal microfluidic platforms using two degrees of freedom. Lab Chip 16:1197–1205
Chen D, Du W, Liu Y, Liu W, Kuznetsov A, Mendez FE, Philipson LH, Ismagilov RF (2008) The chemistrode: a droplet-based microfluidic device for stimulation and recording with high temporal, spatial, and chemical resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:16843–16848
Chen Y, Gani AW, Tang SKY (2012) Characterization of sensitivity and specificity in leaky droplet-based assays. Lab Chip 12:5093–5103
Cho S, Kang D-K, Sim S, Geier F, Kim J-Y, Niu X, Edel JB, Chang S-I, Wootton RCR, Elvira KS, deMello AJ (2013) Droplet-based microfluidic platform for high-throughput, multi-parameter screening of photosensitizer activity. Anal Chem 85:8866–8872
Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidics. Annu Rev Anal Chem 5:413–440
Collins DJ, Alan T, Helmerson K, Neild A (2013) Surface acoustic waves for on-demand production of picoliter droplets and particle encapsulation. Lab Chip 13:3225–3231
Collins DJ, Neild A, deMello A, Liu A-Q, Ai Y (2015) The Poisson distribution and beyond: methods for microfluidic droplet production and single cell encapsulation. Lab Chip 15:3439–3459
Courtney M, Chen X, Chan S, Mohamed T, Rao PPN, Ren CL (2017) Droplet microfluidic system with on-demand trapping and releasing of droplet for drug screening applications. Anal Chem 89:910–915
Courtois F, Olguin LF, Whyte G, Theberge AB, Huck WTS, Hollfelder F, Abell C (2009) Controlling the retention of small molecules in emulsion microdroplets for use in cell-based assays. Anal Chem 81:3008–3016
Cramer C, Fischer P, Windhab EJ (2004) Drop formation in a co-flowing ambient fluid. Chem Eng Sci 59:3045–3058
Damhorst GL, Duarte-Guevara C, Chen W, Ghonge T, Cunningham BT, Bashir R (2015) Smartphone-imaged HIV-1 reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) on a chip from whole blood. Engineering 1:324–335
Dangla R, Kayi SC, Baroud CN (2013) Droplet microfluidics driven by gradients of confinement. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:853–858
Debon AP, Wootton RCR, Elvira KS (2015) Droplet confinement and leakage: causes, underlying effects, and amelioration strategies. Biomicrofluidics 9:24119
Debrand E, Lykoudi A, Bradshaw E, Allen SK (2015) A non-invasive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to detect paternal CFTR mutations in the cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) of three pregnancies at risk of cystic fibrosis via compound heterozygosity. PLoS ONE 10:e0142729
DeKosky BJ, Ippolito GC, Deschner RP, Lavinder JJ, Wine Y, Rawlings BM, Varadarajan N, Giesecke C, Dörner T, Andrews SF, Wilson PC, Hunicke-Smith SP, Willson CG, Ellington AD, Georgiou G (2013) High-throughput sequencing of the paired human immunoglobulin heavy and light chain repertoire. Nat Biotechnol 31:166–169
DeKosky BJ, Kojima T, Rodin A, Charab W, Ippolito GC, Ellington AD, Georgiou G (2014) In-depth determination and analysis of the human paired heavy- and light-chain antibody repertoire. Nat Med 21:86–91
Deng N-N, Sun S-X, Wang W, Ju X-J, Xie R, Chu L-Y (2013) A novel surgery-like strategy for droplet coalescence in microchannels. Lab Chip 13:3653–3657
Diehl F, Li M, He Y, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Dressman D (2006) BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions. Nat Methods 3:551–559
Ding Y, i Solvas XC, deMello A (2014) “V-junction”: a novel structure for high-speed generation of bespoke droplet flows. Analyst 140:414–421
Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (2003) Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8817–8822
Easley CJ, Karlinsey JM, Bienvenue JM, Legendre LA, Roper MG, Feldman SH, Hughes MA, Hewlett EL, Merkel TJ, Ferrance JP, Landers JP (2006) A fully integrated microfluidic genetic analysis system with sample-in–answer-out capability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:19272–19277
Eastburn DJ, Sciambi A, Abate AR (2013a) Ultrahigh-throughput Mammalian single-cell reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic drops. Anal Chem 85:8016–8021
Eastburn DJ, Sciambi A, Abate AR (2013b) Picoinjection enables digital detection of RNA with droplet RT-PCR. PLoS ONE 8:e62961
Eastburn DJ, Sciambi A, Abate AR (2014) Identification and genetic analysis of cancer cells with PCR-activated cell sorting. Nucleic Acids Res 42:e128–e128
Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183–1186
Fakruddin M, Mannan KSB, Chowdhury A, Mazumdar RM, Hossain MN, Islam S, Chowdhury MA (2013) Nucleic acid amplification: alternative methods of polymerase chain reaction. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 5:245–252
Fu Y, Li C, Lu S, Zhou W, Tang F, Xie XS, Huang Y (2015) Uniform and accurate single-cell sequencing based on emulsion whole-genome amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:11923–11928
Gao R, Cheng Z, deMello AJ, Choo J (2016) Wash-free magnetic immunoassay of the PSA cancer marker using SERS and droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip 16:1022–1029
Garti N (1997) Progress in stabilization and transport phenomena of double emulsions in food applications. LWT Food Sci Technol 30:222–235
Gawad C, Koh W, Quake SR (2016) Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nat Rev Genet 17:175–188
Gazdar A (2009) Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 28:S24–S31
Geng T, Novak R, Mathies RA (2014) Single-cell forensic short tandem repeat typing within microfluidic droplets. Anal Chem 86:703–712
Gerver RE, Gómez-Sjöberg R, Baxter BC, Thorn KS, Fordyce PM, Diaz-Botia CA, Helms BA, DeRisi JL (2012) Programmable microfluidic synthesis of spectrally encoded microspheres. Lab Chip 12:4716–4723
Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17:333–351
Gough KM (1989) Theoretical analysis of molecular polarizabilities and polarizability derivatives in hydrocarbons. J Chem Phys 91:2424–2432
Greaves M, Maley CC (2012) Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481:306–313
Griffiths AD, Tawfik DS (2006) Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets. Trends Biotechnol 24:395–402
Gruner P, Riechers B, Chacòn Orellana LA, Brosseau Q, Maes F, Beneyton T, Pekin D, Baret J-C (2015) Stabilisers for water-in-fluorinated-oil dispersions: key properties for microfluidic applications. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 20:183–191
Gruner P, Riechers B, Semin B, Lim J, Johnston A, Short K, Baret J-C (2016) Controlling molecular transport in minimal emulsions. Nat Commun 7:10392
Guo F, Lapsley MI, Nawaz AA, Zhao Y, Lin S-CS, Chen Y, Yang S, Zhao X-Z, Huang TJ (2012) A droplet-based, optofluidic device for high-throughput, Quantitative Bioanalysis. Anal Chem 84:10745–10749
Hatch AC, Fisher JS, Tovar AR, Hsieh AT, Lin R, Pentoney SL, Yang DL, Lee AP (2011a) 1-Million droplet array with wide-field fluorescence imaging for digital PCR. Lab Chip 11:3838–3845
Hatch AC, Fisher JS, Pentoney SL, Yang DL, Lee AP (2011b) Tunable 3D droplet self-assembly for ultra-high-density digital micro-reactor arrays. Lab Chip 11:2509–2517
Hettiarachchi K, Kim H, Faris GW (2012) Optical manipulation and control of real-time PCR in cell encapsulating microdroplets by IR laser. Microfluid Nanofluidics 13:967–975
Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz AJ, Bright IJ, Lucero MY, Hiddessen AL, Legler TC, Kitano TK, Hodel MR, Petersen JF, Wyatt PW, Steenblock ER, Shah PH, Bousse LJ, Troup CB, Mellen JC, Wittmann DK, Erndt NG, Cauley TH, Koehler RT, So AP, Dube S, Rose KA, Montesclaros L, Wang S, Stumbo DP, Hodges SP, Romine S, Milanovich FP, White HE, Regan JF, Karlin-Neumann GA, Hindson CM, Saxonov S, Colston BW (2011) High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of dna copy number. Anal Chem 83:8604–8610
Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, Gallichotte EN, Ruf IK, Hindson BJ, Vessella RL, Tewari M (2013) Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat Methods 10:1003–1005
Holtze C, Rowat AC, Agresti JJ, Hutchison JB, Angilè FE, Schmitz CHJ, Köster S, Duan H, Humphry KJ, Scanga RA, Johnson JS, Pisignano D, Weitz DA (2008) Biocompatible surfactants for water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Lab Chip 8:1632–1639
Huebner A, Srisa-Art M, Holt D, Abell C, Hollfelder F, deMello AJ, Edel JB (2007) Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics. Chem Commun 28(12):1218–1220
Huebner A, Bratton D, Whyte G, Yang M, deMello AJ, Abell C, Hollfelder F (2009) Static microdroplet arrays: a microfluidic device for droplet trapping, incubation and release for enzymatic and cell-based assays. Lab Chip 9:692–698
Ji X-H, Cheng W, Guo F, Liu W, Guo S-S, He Z-K, Zhao X-Z (2011) On-demand preparation of quantum dot-encoded microparticles using a droplet microfluidic system. Lab Chip 11:2561–2568
Juul S, Nielsen CJF, Labouriau R, Roy A, Tesauro C, Jensen PW, Harmsen C, Kristoffersen EL, Chiu Y-L, Frøhlich R, Fiorani P, Cox-Singh J, Tordrup D, Koch J, Bienvenu A-L, Desideri A, Picot S, Petersen E, Leong KW, Ho Y-P, Stougaard M, Knudsen BR (2012) Droplet microfluidics platform for highly sensitive and quantitative detection of malaria-causing plasmodium parasites based on enzyme activity measurement. ACS Nano 6:10676–10683
Kabalnov A (2001) Ostwald ripening and related phenomena. J Dispers Sci Technol 22:1–12
Kalinina O, Lebedeva I, Brown J, Silver J (1997) Nanoliter scale PCR with TaqMan detection. Nucleic Acids Res 25:1999–2004
Kelly BT, Baret J-C, Taly V, Griffiths AD (2007) Miniaturizing chemistry and biology in microdroplets. Chem Commun 18:1773–1788
Kim S-J, Lai D, Park JY, Yokokawa R, Takayama S (2012a) Microfluidic automation using elastomeric valves and droplets: reducing reliance on external controllers. Small 8:2925–2934
Kim SH, Iwai S, Araki S, Sakakihara S, Iino R, Noji H (2012b) Large-scale femtoliter droplet array for digital counting of single biomolecules. Lab Chip 12:4986–4991
Kiss MM, Ortoleva-Donnelly L, Beer NR, Warner J, Bailey CG, Colston BW, Rothberg JM, Link DR, Leamon JH (2008) High-throughput quantitative polymerase chain reaction in picoliter droplets. Anal Chem 80:8975–8981
Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, Tallapragada N, Veres A, Li V, Peshkin L, Weitz DA, Kirschner MW (2015) Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161:1187–1201
Kobayashi I, Mukataka S, Nakajima M (2005) Novel asymmetric through-hole array microfabricated on a silicon plate for formulating monodisperse emulsions. Langmuir 21:7629–7632
Kopp MU, de Mello AJ, Manz A (1998) Chemical amplification: continuous-flow PCR on a chip. Science 280:1046–1048
Korczyk PM, Derzsi L, Jakieła S, Garstecki P (2013) Microfluidic traps for hard-wired operations on droplets. Lab Chip 13:4096–4102
Köster S, Angilè FE, Duan H, Agresti JJ, Wintner A, Schmitz C, Rowat AC, Merten CA, Pisignano D, Griffiths AD, Weitz DA (2008) Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells. Lab Chip 8:1110–1115
Kuleshov V, Xie D, Chen R, Pushkarev D, Ma Z, Blauwkamp T, Kertesz M, Snyder M (2014) Whole-genome haplotyping using long reads and statistical methods. Nat Biotechnol 32:261–266
Kumachev A, Greener J, Tumarkin E, Eiser E, Zandstra PW, Kumacheva E (2011) High-throughput generation of hydrogel microbeads with varying elasticity for cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 32:1477–1483
Kumaresan P, Yang CJ, Cronier SA, Blazej RG, Mathies RA (2008) High-throughput single copy DNA amplification and cell analysis in engineered nanoliter droplets. Anal Chem 80:3522–3529
Lan F, Haliburton JR, Yuan A, Abate AR (2016) Droplet barcoding for massively parallel single-molecule deep sequencing. Nat Commun 7:11784
Lemal DM (2004) Perspective on fluorocarbon chemistry. J Org Chem 69:1–11
Leng X, Zhang W, Wang C, Cui L, Yang CJ (2010) Agarose droplet microfluidics for highly parallel and efficient single molecule emulsion PCR. Lab Chip 10:2841–2843
Levy SE, Myers RM (2016) Advancements in next-generation sequencing. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 17:95–115
Li R, Hsieh C-L, Young A, Zhang Z, Ren X, Zhao Z (2015) Illumina synthetic long read sequencing allows recovery of missing sequences even in the “Finished” C elegans Genome. Sci Rep 5:10814
Liberali P, Snijder B, Pelkmans L (2015) Single-cell and multivariate approaches in genetic perturbation screens. Nat Rev Genet 16:18–32
Lièvre A, Bachet J-B, Corre DL, Boige V, Landi B, Emile J-F, Côté J-F, Tomasic G, Penna C, Ducreux M, Rougier P, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66:3992–3995
Lignos I, Stavrakis S, Kilaj A, deMello AJ (2015) Millisecond-timescale monitoring of PbS nanoparticle nucleation and growth using droplet-based microfluidics. Small 11:4009–4017
Lignos I, Stavrakis S, Nedelcu G, Protesescu L, deMello AJ, Kovalenko MV (2016) Synthesis of cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals in a droplet-based microfluidic platform: fast parametric space mapping. Nano Lett 16:1869–1877
Link DR, Anna SL, Weitz DA, Stone HA (2004) Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys Rev Lett 92:54503
Link DR, Grasland-Mongrain E, Duri A, Sarrazin F, Cheng Z, Cristobal G, Marquez M, Weitz DA (2006) Electric control of droplets in microfluidic devices. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:2556–2560
Linn EE, West MP (1989) Water-in-oil microemulsions for cosmetic uses
Lorenz RM, Edgar JS, Jeffries GDM, Chiu DT (2006) Microfluidic and optical systems for the on-demand generation and manipulation of single femtoliter-volume aqueous droplets. Anal Chem 78:6433–6439
Maceiczyk RM, deMello AJ (2014) Fast and reliable metamodeling of complex reaction spaces using universal kriging. J Phys Chem C 118:20026–20033
Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K, Goldman M, Tirosh I, Bialas AR, Kamitaki N, Martersteck EM, Trombetta JJ, Weitz DA, Sanes JR, Shalek AK, Regev A, McCarroll SA (2015) Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161:1202–1214
Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J-B, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380
Markey AL, Mohr S, Day PJR (2010) High-throughput droplet PCR. Methods 50:277–281
Martel JM, Toner M (2014) Inertial focusing in microfluidics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:371–396
Mazutis L, Griffiths AD (2012) Selective droplet coalescence using microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 12:1800–1806
McDaniel JR, DeKosky BJ, Tanno H, Ellington AD, Georgiou G (2016) Ultra-high-throughput sequencing of the immune receptor repertoire from millions of lymphocytes. Nat Protoc 11:429–442
Mehrian-Shai R, Yalon M, Moshe I, Barshack I, Nass D, Jacob J, Dor C, Reichardt JKV, Constantini S, Toren A (2016) Identification of genomic aberrations in hemangioblastoma by droplet digital PCR and SNP microarray highlights novel candidate genes and pathways for pathogenesis. BMC Genom 17:56
Miotke L, Lau BT, Rumma RT, Ji HP (2014) High sensitivity detection and quantitation of DNA copy number and single nucleotide variants with single color droplet digital PCR. Anal Chem 86:2618–2624
Mori Y, Notomi T (2009) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother 15:62–69
Mullis K, Faloona F, Scharf S, Saiki R, Horn G, Erlich H (1986) Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 51:263–273
Nakano M, Komatsu J, Matsuura S, Takashima K, Katsura S, Mizuno A (2003) Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion. J Biotechnol 102:117–124
Nam J, Lim H, Kim C, Kang JY, Shin S (2012) Density-dependent separation of encapsulated cells in a microfluidic channel by using a standing surface acoustic wave. Biomicrofluidics 6:24120
Nederbragt L (2016) Developments in NGS
Nishikawa Y, Hosokawa M, Maruyama T, Yamagishi K, Mori T, Takeyama H (2015) Monodisperse picoliter droplets for low-bias and contamination-free reactions in single-cell whole genome amplification. PLoS ONE 10:e0138733
Niu X, deMello AJ (2012) Building droplet-based microfluidic systems for biological analysis. Biochem Soc Trans 40:615–623
Niu X, Gulati S, Edel JB, deMello AJ (2008) Pillar-induced droplet merging in microfluidic circuits. Lab Chip 8:1837
Niu X, Gielen F, Edel JB, deMello AJ (2011) A microdroplet dilutor for high-throughput screening. Nat Chem 3:437–442
Njiru ZK, Mikosza ASJ, Armstrong T, Enyaru JC, Ndung’u JM, Thompson ARC (2008) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for rapid detection of trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. PLOS Negl Trop Dis 2:e147
Novak R, Zeng Y, Shuga J, Venugopalan G, Fletcher DA, Smith MT, Mathies RA (2011) Single-cell multiplex gene detection and sequencing with microfluidically generated agarose emulsions. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:390–395
O’Hagan D (2008) Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C–F bond. Chem Soc Rev 37:308–319
Oh KW, Lee K, Ahn B, Furlani EP (2012) Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy. Lab Chip 12:515–545
Orhant L, Anselem O, Fradin M, Becker PH, Beugnet C, Deburgrave N, Tafuri G, Letourneur F, Goffinet F, Allach El Khattabi L, Leturcq F, Bienvenu T, Tsatsaris V, Nectoux J (2016) Droplet digital PCR combined with minisequencing, a new approach to analyze fetal DNA from maternal blood: application to the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia. Prenat Diagn 36:397–406
Ottesen EA, Hong JW, Quake SR, Leadbetter JR (2006) Microfluidic digital PCR enables multigene analysis of individual environmental bacteria. Science 314:1464–1467
Pan X, Zeng S, Zhang Q, Lin B, Qin J (2011) Sequential microfluidic droplet processing for rapid DNA extraction. Electrophoresis 32:3399–3405
Pekin D, Skhiri Y, Baret J-C, Corre DL, Mazutis L, Salem CB, Millot F, Harrak AE, Hutchison JB, Larson JW, Link DR, Laurent-Puig P, Griffiths AD, Taly V (2011) Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 11:2156–2166
Petriv OI, Heyries KA, VanInsberghe M, Walker D, Hansen CL (2014) Methods for multiplex template sampling in digital PCR assays. PLoS ONE 9:e98341
Picelli S (2016) Single-cell RNA-sequencing: the future of genome biology is now. RNA Biol 0:1–14
Poon LLM, Leung CSW, Tashiro M, Chan KH, Wong BWY, Yuen KY, Guan Y, Peiris JSM (2004) Rapid detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Clin Chem 50:1050–1052
Prakash M, Gershenfeld N (2007) Microfluidic bubble logic. Science 315:832–835
Price AK, Paegel BM (2016) Discovery in droplets. Anal Chem 88:339–353
Proserpio V, Mahata B (2016) Single-cell technologies to study the immune system. Immunology 147:133–140
Rane TD, Zec HC, Wang T-H (2015a) A barcode-free combinatorial screening platform for matrix metalloproteinase screening. Anal Chem 87:1950–1956
Rane TD, Chen L, Zec HC, Wang T-H (2015b) Microfluidic continuous flow digital loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Lab Chip 15:776–782
Reizman BJ, Jensen KF (2016) Feedback in flow for accelerated reaction development. Acc Chem Res 49:1786–1796
Rotem A, Ram O, Shoresh N, Sperling RA, Goren A, Weitz DA, Bernstein BE (2015) Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat Biotechnol 33:1165–1172
Schaerli Y, Wootton RC, Robinson T, Stein V, Dunsby C, Neil MAA, French PMW, deMello AJ, Abell C, Hollfelder F (2009) Continuous-flow polymerase chain reaction of single-copy DNA in microfluidic microdroplets. Anal Chem 81:302–306
Schuler F, Schwemmer F, Trotter M, Wadle S, Zengerle R, von Stetten F, Paust N (2015) Centrifugal step emulsification applied for absolute quantification of nucleic acids by digital droplet RPA. Lab Chip 15:2759
Schütze T, Rubelt F, Repkow J, Greiner N, Erdmann VA, Lehrach H, Konthur Z, Glökler J (2011) A streamlined protocol for emulsion polymerase chain reaction and subsequent purification. Anal Biochem 410:155–157
Sgro AE, Allen PB, Chiu DT (2007) Thermoelectric manipulation of aqueous droplets in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 79:4845–4851
Shembekar N, Chaipan C, Utharala R, Merten CA (2016) Droplet-based microfluidics in drug discovery, transcriptomics and high-throughput molecular genetics. Lab Chip 16:1314–1331
Shim J, Ranasinghe RT, Smith CA, Ibrahim SM, Hollfelder F, Huck WTS, Klenerman D, Abell C (2013) Ultrarapid generation of femtoliter microfluidic droplets for single-molecule-counting immunoassays. ACS Nano 7:5955–5964
Siravegna G, Mussolin B, Buscarino M, Corti G, Cassingena A, Crisafulli G, Ponzetti A, Cremolini C, Amatu A, Lauricella C, Lamba S, Hobor S, Avallone A, Valtorta E, Rospo G, Medico E, Motta V, Antoniotti C, Tatangelo F, Bellosillo B, Veronese S, Budillon A, Montagut C, Racca P, Marsoni S, Falcone A, Corcoran RB, Di Nicolantonio F, Loupakis F, Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Bardelli A (2015) Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. Nat Med 21:795–801
Sjostrom SL, Bai Y, Huang M, Liu Z, Nielsen J, Joensson HN, Svahn HA (2013) High-throughput screening for industrial enzyme production hosts by droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip 14:806–813
Skhiri Y, Gruner P, Semin B, Brosseau Q, Pekin D, Mazutis L, Goust V, Kleinschmidt F, Harrak AE, Hutchison JB, Mayot E, Bartolo J-F, Griffiths AD, Taly V, Baret J-C (2012) Dynamics of molecular transport by surfactants in emulsions. Soft Matter 8:10618–10627
Song H, Bringer MR, Tice JD, Gerdts CJ, Ismagilov RF (2003) Experimental test of scaling of mixing by chaotic advection in droplets moving through microfluidic channels. Appl Phys Lett 83:4664–4666
Sugiura S, Nakajima M, Iwamoto S, Seki M (2001) Interfacial tension driven monodispersed droplet formation from microfabricated channel array. Langmuir 17:5562–5566
Sun M, Vanapalli SA (2013) Generation of chemical concentration gradients in mobile droplet arrays via fragmentation of long immiscible diluting plugs. Anal Chem 85:2044–2048
Surabattula R, Vejandla MP, Mallepaddi PC, Faulstich K, Polavarapu R (2013) Simple, rapid, inexpensive platform for the diagnosis of malaria by loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Exp Parasitol 134:333–340
Taly V, Pekin D, Benhaim L, Kotsopoulos SK, Corre DL, Li X, Atochin I, Link DR, Griffiths AD, Pallier K, Blons H, Bouché O, Landi B, Hutchison JB, Laurent-Puig P (2013) Multiplex picodroplet digital PCR to detect KRAS mutations in circulating DNA from the plasma of colorectal cancer patients. Clin Chem 59:1722–1731
Tao Y, Rotem A, Zhang H, Cockrell SK, Koehler SA, Chang CB, Ung LW, Cantalupo PG, Ren Y, Lin JS, Feldman AB, Wobus CE, Pipas JM, Weitz DA (2015) Artifact-free quantification and sequencing of rare recombinant viruses by using drop-based microfluidics. ChemBioChem 16:2167–2171
Tewhey R, Warner JB, Nakano M, Libby B, Medkova M, David PH, Kotsopoulos SK, Samuels ML, Hutchison JB, Larson JW, Topol EJ, Weiner MP, Harismendy O, Olson J, Link DR, Frazer KA (2009) Microdroplet-based PCR enrichment for large-scale targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 27:1025–1031
Thorsen T, Roberts RW, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86:4163–4166
Tilgner H, Jahanbani F, Blauwkamp T, Moshrefi A, Jaeger E, Chen F, Harel I, Bustamante CD, Rasmussen M, Snyder MP (2015) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis using synthetic long-read sequencing reveals molecular co-association of distant splicing events. Nat Biotechnol 33:736–742
Tomita N, Mori Y, Kanda H, Notomi T (2008) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of gene sequences and simple visual detection of products. Nat Protoc 3:877–882
Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL (2012) Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 13:36–46
Trypsteen W, Kiselinova M, Vandekerckhove L, De Spiegelaere W (2016) Diagnostic utility of droplet digital PCR for HIV reservoir quantification. J Virus Erad 2:162–169
Turchaninova MA, Britanova OV, Bolotin DA, Shugay M, Putintseva EV, Staroverov DB, Sharonov G, Shcherbo D, Zvyagin IV, Mamedov IZ, Linnemann C, Schumacher TN, Chudakov DM (2013) Pairing of T-cell receptor chains via emulsion PCR. Eur J Immunol 43:2507–2515
Ugelstad J, El-Aasser MS, Vanderhoff JW (1973) Emulsion polymerization: initiation of polymerization in monomer droplets. J Polym Sci Polym Lett Ed 11:503–513
Umbanhowar PB, Prasad V, Weitz DA (2000) monodisperse emulsion generation via drop break off in a coflowing stream. Langmuir 16:347–351
Unger MA, Chou H-P, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288:113–116
Vekselman V, Sande L, Kornev KG (2015) Fully magnetic printing by generation of magnetic droplets on demand with a coilgun. J Appl Phys 118:224902
Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1999) Digital PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:9236–9241
Wang W, Yang C, Liu Y, Li CM (2010) On-demand droplet release for droplet-based microfluidic system. Lab Chip 10:559–562
Wang J, Brisk P, Grover WH (2016) Random design of microfluidics. Lab Chip 16:4212–4219
Watanabe M, Kawaguchi T, Isa S, Ando M, Tamiya A, Kubo A, Saka H, Takeo S, Adachi H, Tagawa T, Kakegawa S, Yamashita M, Kataoka K, Ichinose Y, Takeuchi Y, Sakamoto K, Matsumura A, Koh Y (2015) Ultra-sensitive detection of the pretreatment EGFR T790 M mutation in non-small cell lung cancer patients with an EGFR-activating mutation using droplet digital PCR. Clin Cancer Res 21:3552–3560
Weaver JA, Melin J, Stark D, Quake SR, Horowitz MA (2010) Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves. Nat Phys 6:218–223
Webster AJ, Cates ME (1998) Stabilization of emulsions by trapped species. Langmuir 14:2068–2079
Wen H, Yu Y, Zhu G, Jiang L, Qin J (2015) A droplet microchip with substance exchange capability for the developmental study of C. elegans. Lab Chip 15:1905–1911
White RA, Blainey PC, Fan HC, Quake SR (2009) Digital PCR provides sensitive and absolute calibration for high throughput sequencing. BMC Genom 10:116
Willaime H, Barbier V, Kloul L, Maine S, Tabeling P (2006) Arnold tongues in a microfluidic drop emitter. Phys Rev Lett 96:54501
Williams R, Peisajovich SG, Miller OJ, Magdassi S, Tawfik DS, Griffiths AD (2006) Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR. Nat Methods 3:545–550
Woolley AT, Hadley D, Landre P, deMello AJ, Mathies RA, Northrup MA (1996) Functional integration of PCR amplification and capillary electrophoresis in a microfabricated DNA analysis device. Anal Chem 68:4081–4086
Xu Q, Hashimoto M, Dang TT, Hoare T, Kohane DS, Whitesides GM, Langer R, Anderson DG (2009) Preparation of monodisperse biodegradable polymer microparticles using a microfluidic flow-focusing device for controlled drug delivery. Small 5:1575–1581
Xu X, Hou Y, Yin X, Bao L, Tang A, Song L, Li F, Tsang S, Wu K, Wu H, He W, Zeng L, Xing M, Wu R, Jiang H, Liu X, Cao D, Guo G, Hu X, Gui Y, Li Z, Xie W, Sun X, Shi M, Cai Z, Wang B, Zhong M, Li J, Lu Z, Gu N, Zhang X, Goodman L, Bolund L, Wang J, Yang H, Kristiansen K, Dean M, Li Y, Wang J (2012) Single-cell exome sequencing reveals single-nucleotide mutation characteristics of a kidney tumor. Cell 148:886–895
Yesiloz G, Boybay MS, Ren CL (2015) Label-free high-throughput detection and content sensing of individual droplets in microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 15:4008–4019
Zanoli LM, Spoto G (2012) Isothermal amplification methods for the detection of nucleic acids in microfluidic devices. Biosensors 3:18–43
Zeng S, Li B, Su X, Qin J, Lin B (2009) Microvalve-actuated precise control of individual droplets in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9:1340–1343
Zeng Y, Novak R, Shuga J, Smith MT, Mathies RA (2010) High-performance single cell genetic analysis using microfluidic emulsion generator arrays. Anal Chem 82:3183–3190
Zhang C, Xing D (2007) Miniaturized PCR chips for nucleic acid amplification and analysis: latest advances and future trends. Nucleic Acids Res 35:4223–4237
Zhang H, Jenkins G, Zou Y, Zhu Z, Yang CJ (2012) Massively parallel single-molecule and single-cell emulsion reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using agarose droplet microfluidics. Anal Chem 84:3599–3606
Zheng GXY, Lau BT, Schnall-Levin M, Jarosz M, Bell JM, Hindson CM, Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S, Masquelier DA, Merrill L, Terry JM, Mudivarti PA, Wyatt PW, Bharadwaj R, Makarewicz AJ, Li Y, Belgrader P, Price AD, Lowe AJ, Marks P, Vurens GM, Hardenbol P, Montesclaros L, Luo M, Greenfield L, Wong A, Birch DE, Short SW, Bjornson KP, Patel P, Hopmans ES, Wood C, Kaur S, Lockwood GK, Stafford D, Delaney JP, Wu I, Ordonez HS, Grimes SM, Greer S, Lee JY, Belhocine K, Giorda KM, Heaton WH, McDermott GP, Bent ZW, Meschi F, Kondov NO, Wilson R, Bernate JA, Gauby S, Kindwall A, Bermejo C, Fehr AN, Chan A, Saxonov S, Ness KD, Hindson BJ, Ji HP (2016a) Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 34:303–311
Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, Wilson R, Ziraldo SB, Wheeler TD, McDermott GP, Zhu J, Gregory MT, Shuga J, Montesclaros L, Masquelier DA, Nishimura SY, Schnall-Levin M, Wyatt PW, Hindson CM, Bharadwaj R, Wong A, Ness KD, Beppu LW, Deeg J, McFarland C, Loeb KR, Valente WJ, Ericson NG, Stevens EA, Radich JP, Mikkelsen TS, Hindson BJ, Bielas JH (2016b) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. doi:10.1038/ncomms14049
Zhong Q, Bhattacharya S, Kotsopoulos S, Olson J, Taly V, Griffiths AD, Link DR, Larson JW (2011) Multiplex digital PCR: breaking the one target per color barrier of quantitative PCR. Lab Chip 11:2167–2174
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Tobias Wolf for the help of collecting droplet PCR reactions in Table 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the topical collection “2016 International Conference of Microfluidics, Nanofluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip, Dalian, China” guest edited by Chun Yang, Carolyn Ren and Xiangchun Xuan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, Y., Choo, J. & deMello, A.J. From single-molecule detection to next-generation sequencing: microfluidic droplets for high-throughput nucleic acid analysis. Microfluid Nanofluid 21, 58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-1889-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-1889-4