Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced electrophoresis separation of non-electroactive amino acids on poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip coupled with direct electrochemical detection on a copper electrode

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical determination of amino acids on a Cu electrode was established as an attractive scheme for non-electroactive amino acids after microchip electrophoresis separation. Five amino acids (arginine, proline, histidine, valine, and serine) achieved efficient separation within 60 s on a titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) coated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microchip, and then successfully detected on a Cu electrode in end-channel detection mode. In the slightly basic borate medium, anodic currents occur for amino acids due to their ability to form Cu(II) complexes and thereby enhance the electrochemical dissolution of Cu electrode substrate. The increase of the anodic current measured is proportional to the amino acid concentration added to the solution, and therefore, enables direct detection of non-electroactive amino acids on the Cu electrode. The detection limits (S/N = 3) for arginine, proline, histidine, valine, and serine were measured to be 7, 6, 5, 6, and 5 μM, respectively, with the linear ranges all from 25 to 500 μM. In addition, compared with the native PDMS microchip, resolutions and separation efficiencies of amino acids on the modified microchip were considerably enhanced with the theoretical plate numbers of 8.9 × 103, 6.6 × 104, 4.8 × 104, 5.6 × 104, and 4.4 × 104 plates m−1, respectively. The proposed Cu electrode response demonstrated good reproducibility and stability, with no apparent loss of response for periods as long as 4 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Denoroy L, Parrot S, Renaud L, Renaud B, Zimmer C (2008) In-capillary derivatization and capillary electrophoresis separation of amino acid neurotransmitters from brain microdialysis samples. J Chromatogr A 1205:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo RP, Lawrence NS, Wang J (2004) Electrochemical detection of amino acids at carbon nanotube and nickel–carbon nanotube modified electrodes. Analyst 129:1076–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou YH, Bao N, Xu JJ, Chen HY (2002) A dynamically modified microfluidic poly(dimethylsiloxane) chip with electrochemical detection for biological analysis. Electrophoresis 23:3558–3566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heli H, Hajjizadeh M, Jabbari A, Moosavi-Movahedi AA (2009) Fine steps of electrocatalytic oxidation and sensitive detection of some amino acids on copper nanoparticles. Anal Biochem 388:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokfelt T (1991) Neuropeptides in perspective: the last 10 years. Neuron 7:867–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh YL, Chen TH, Liu CP, Liu CY (2005) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles-coated column for capillary electrochromatographic separation of oligopeptides. Electrophoresis 26:4089–4097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DC, LaCourse WR (1990) Liquid chromatography with pulsed electrochemical detection at gold and platinum electrodes. Anal Chem 62:589A–597A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KoK WTH, Hanekamp HB, Bos P, Frei RW (1982) Amperometric detection of amino acids with a passivated copper electrode. Anal Chim Acta 142:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo PF, Zhang FZ, Baldwin RP (1991) Constant-potential amperometric detection of underivatized amino acids and peptides at a copper electrode. Anal Chem 63:1702–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu JD, Wang L, Liang RP, Wang JW (2009) Microchip CE analysis of amino acids on a titanium dioxide nanoparticles-coated PDMS microfluidic device with in-channel indirect amperometric detection. Electrophoresis 30:3472–3479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman GT, Culbertson CT (2006) Surface engineering of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices using transition metal sol–gel chemistry. Langmuir 22:4445–4451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang AJ, Xu JJ, Chen HY (2006a) Nonionic surfactant dynamic coating of poly(dimethylsiloxane) channel surface for microchip electrophoresis of amino acids. Anal Chim Acta 569:188–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang AJ, Xu JJ, Zhang Q, Chen HY (2006b) The use of poly(dimethylsiloxane) surface modification with gold nanoparticles for the microchip electrophoresis. Talanta 69:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhao L, Zhang JR, Wang XM, Zhu JJ, Chen HY (2006c) Modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels with silica nanoparticles based on layer-by-layer assembly technique. J Chromatogr A 1136:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang AJ, Xu JJ, Chen HY (2007) In situ grafting hydrophilic polymer on chitosan modified poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip for separation of biomolecules. J Chromatogr A 1147:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang AJ, Feng JJ, Fan J (2008) Covalent modified hydrophilic polymer brushes onto poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannel surface for electrophoresis separation of amino acids. J Chromatogr A 1192:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch LE, LaCourse WR, Mead DA Jr, Johnson DC, Hu T (1989) Comparison of pulsed coulometric detection and potential-sweep-pulsed coulometric detection for underivatized amino acids in liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 61:555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DP, Luo Y, Zhou XM, Dai ZP, Lin BC (2005) Multilayer poly(vinyl alcohol)-adsorbed coating on poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chips for biopolymer separation. Electrophoresis 26:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu DP, Zhao BX, Dai ZP, Qin JH, Lin BC (2006) Grafting epoxy-modified hydrophilic polymers onto poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chip to resist nonspecific protein adsorption. Lab Chip 6:942–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JJ, Bao N, Xia XH, Peng Y, Chen HY (2004) Electrochemical detection method for nonelectroactive and electroactive analytes in microchip electrophoresis. Anal Chem 76:6902–6907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JJ, Peng Y, Bao N, Xia XH, Chen HY (2005) Simple method for the separation and detection of native amino acids and the identification of electroactive and non-electroactive analytes. J Chromatogr A 1095:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZW, Feng XJ, Luo QG, Liu BF (2009) Environmentally friendly surface modification of PDMS using PEG polymer brush. Electrophoresis 30:3174–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JX, Lunte SM (1995) Direct determination of amino acids by capillary electrophoresis/electrochemistry using a copper microelectrode and zwitterionic buffers. Electrophoresis 16:498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial supports for this project from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 20865003, 20805023, and 21065006) and the Program for Young Scientists of Jiangxi Province (2008222).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianding Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, R., Wang, L., Meng, X. et al. Enhanced electrophoresis separation of non-electroactive amino acids on poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip coupled with direct electrochemical detection on a copper electrode. Microfluid Nanofluid 11, 227–233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0799-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0799-0

Keywords

Navigation