Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative ultrasound measurement of bone density based on dynamic time window: suitable for the measurement of speed of sound in radius

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our objective was to evaluate the dynamic time window method (DTWM) for the measurement of speed of sound (SOS) at the 1/3 distal radius in 10 human subjects in vivo. DTWM, which is based on our proprietary probe, is a new method for obtaining the accurate time of flight (TOF) of the first arriving signal (FAS).

Method

This study compared DTWM with three conventional methods, i.e., threshold value method, first of maxima, and zero-crossing method, for the measurement of TOF of FAS.

Results

The highest correlation between SOS and bone mineral density (BMD) was found in the 10 human subjects using DTWM (R DTWM = 0.81, p < 0.005) rather than the three conventional methods (R = 0.37–0.41, p > 0.05). The individual short-term coefficient of variation (CV, from 0.07 to 0.27) and Root-Mean-Square (RMS) of the average CV (CVRMS, 0.18) were used to evaluate the reproducibility of our method (DTWM).

Conclusion

Despite the small population, the results suggest that DTWM improves the accuracy of recognition of SOS in vivo, and might be applied to optimize the clinical assessment of long cortical bone osteoporosis and fracture risk profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talmant M, Kolta S, Roux C, et al. In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:912–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Protopappas VC, Vavva MG, Fotiadis DI, et al. Ultrasonic monitoring of bone fracture healing. IEEE Trans UFFC. 2008;55:1243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sasso M, Talmant M, Haiat G, et al. Analysis of the most energetic late arrival in axially transmitted signals in cortical bone. IEEE Trans UFFC. 2009;56:2463–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Daugschies M, Rohde K, Gluer CC, et al. The preliminary evaluation of a 1 MHz ultrasound probe for measuring the elastic anisotropy of human cortical bone. Ultrasonics. 2014;54:4–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbieri G, Barbieri CH, Mazzer N, et al. Ultrasound propagation velocity and broadband attenuation can help evaluate the healing process of an experimental fracture. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:444–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foiret J, Grimal Q, Talmant M, Longo R, et al. Probing heterogeneity of cortical bone with ultrasound axial transmission. IEEE Trans UFFC. 2013;60:187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muller M, Moilanen P, Bossy E, et al. Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:633–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Protopappas VC, Fotiadis DI, Malizos KN. Guided ultrasound wave propagation in intact and healing long bones. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:693–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Machado CB, Albuquerque Pereira WC, Talmant M, et al. Computational evaluation of the compositional factors in fracture healing affecting ultrasound axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1314–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Protopappas VC, Dimitrios AB, Likas AC, et al. An ultrasound wearable system for the monitoring and acceleration of fracture healing in long bones. IEEE T Bio Med Eng. 2005;52:1597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grondin J, Grimal Q, Engelke K, et al. Potential of first arriving signal to assess cortical bone geometry at the hip with QUS: a model based study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:656–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bossy E, Talmant M, Laugier P. Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dodd SP, Cunningham JL, Miles AW, et al. Ultrasound transmission loss across transverse and oblique bone fractures: an in vitro study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:454–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossy E, Talmant M, Defontaine M, et al. Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials. IEEE Trans UFFC. 2004;51:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, et al. A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kantorovich E, Pasternak V, Ashkenazi S, et al. Determination of acoustic velocity in bone. US Patent 7, 2006;112:173 B1.

  17. Bossy E, Talmant M, Peyrin F, et al. An in vitro study of the ultrasonic axial transmission technique at the radius: 1-MHz velocity measurements are sensitive to both mineralization and intracortical porosity. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1548–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laugier P, Haiat G. Bone quantitative ultrasound. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Klippa V. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilappa V, Xu KL, Moilanen P, et al. Assessment of the fundamental flexural guided wave in cortical bone by an ultrasonic axial-transmission array transducer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vavva MG, Protopappas VC, Gergidis LN, et al. The effect of boundary conditions on guided wave propagation in two-dimensional models of healing bone. Ultrasonics. 2008;48:598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baron C. Using the gradient of human cortical bone properties to determine age-related bone changes via ultrasonic guided waves. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:972–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Song X, Ta D, Wang W. Analysis of superimposed ultrasonic guided waves in long bones by the joint approximate diagonalization of eigen-matrices algorithm. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1704–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hans D, Srivastav SK, Singal C, et al. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:644–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NSFC (No. 61401436), the National Science and Technology Pillar Program (No. 2013BAH14F01), and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China (No. 1308085MF99).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanyan Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical statements

The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. All study participants gave written informed consent after the study was explained to them.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Quantitative ultrasound measurement of bone density based on dynamic time window: suitable for the measurement of speed of sound in radius. J Med Ultrasonics 43, 347–354 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0710-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0710-4

Keywords

Navigation