Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Discordance between conventional ultrasonography and ElastPQ for assessing hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: frequency and independent factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the frequency of discordance and to identify factors associated with discordance between ultrasonographic and elastographic grades for assessing hepatic fibrosis in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Methods

Three hundred thirty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B for which both conventional ultrasonography and liver stiffness measurements using elastography were available were included. Patients were graded as ‘normal’, ‘chronic liver disease’, or ‘liver cirrhosis’ by ultrasonography, and as ‘no significant fibrosis’, ‘significant fibrosis’, or ‘liver cirrhosis’ by elastography, and the results of these two modalities were compared. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with discordant results.

Results

Of the 334 patients, 153 (45.8 %), 115 (34.4 %), and 66 (19.8 %) patients were ‘normal’, ‘chronic liver disease’, and ‘liver cirrhosis’, respectively, based on the ultrasonographic grades, and 290 (86.8 %), 29 (8.7 %), and 15 (4.5 %) patients were ‘no significant fibrosis,’ ‘significant fibrosis’, and ‘liver cirrhosis’, respectively, based on the elastographic values. Among them, 173 (51.8 %) showed discordance with respect to severity of hepatic fibrosis. In multivariable analysis, discordance was more frequent in patients with ultrasonographic grades of ‘chronic liver disease’ [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1924; P < 0.001] and ‘liver cirrhosis’ (AOR, 4498; P < 0.001), whereas patients with an elastographic grade of ‘liver cirrhosis’ showed a negative association with discordance (AOR, 0.002; P = 0.007).

Conclusion

There was a high rate of discordance between hepatic fibrosis grades determined by ultrasonography and elastography. Considering the accuracy of liver stiffness evaluation by elastography, conventional ultrasonography might overestimate hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedman SL. Seminars in medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. The cellular basis of hepatic fibrosis. Mechanisms and treatment strategies. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1828–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, et al. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986;2:165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2614–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolondi L, Gandolfi L, Arienti V, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of portal hypertension: diminished response of portal vessels to respiration. Radiology. 1982;142:167–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okuda K. Early recognition of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1986;6:729–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leung VY, Shen J, Wong VW, et al. Quantitative elastography of liver fibrosis and spleen stiffness in chronic hepatitis B carriers: comparison of shear-wave elastography and transient elastography with liver biopsy correlation. Radiology. 2013;269:910–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Guo L, Shi X, et al. Real-time elastography with a novel quantitative technology for assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e31–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sporea I, Sirli R, Bota S, et al. Comparative study concerning the value of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI) in comparison with transient elastography (TE) for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sporea I, Bota S, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for fibrosis evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis C: an international multicenter study. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:4112–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, et al. Point shear wave elastography method for assessing liver stiffness. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:4787–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma JJ, Ding H, Mao F, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis with elastography point quantification technique in chronic hepatitis B virus patients: a comparison with liver pathological results. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:814–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korean Association for the Study of the L. KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013;19:325–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carol A, Mittelstaedt LMV. Abdominal ultrasound. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1987. p. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M, et al. Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection–analysis of 300 cases. Radiology. 2003;227:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW. Diagnostic ultrasound. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 110–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aube C, Oberti F, Korali N, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1999;30:472–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Onofrio M, Martone E, Brunelli S, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. Radiol Med. 2005;110:341–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Needleman L, Kurtz AB, Rifkin MD, et al. Sonography of diffuse benign liver disease: accuracy of pattern recognition and grading. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146:1011–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gosink BB, Lemon SK, Scheible W, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of hepatocellular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133:19–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Debongnie JC, Pauls C, Fieves M, et al. Prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of liver ultrasonography. Gut. 1981;22:130–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zoli M, Cordiani MR, Marchesini G, et al. Ultrasonographic follow-up of liver cirrhosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:91–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Summary of safety and effectiveness. iU22 diagnostic ultrasound system. (updated 2015 June; created 2013 June). http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf13/K130499.pdf.

  23. Wang JH, Changchien CS, Hung CH, et al. Liver stiffness decrease after effective antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: longitudinal study using fibroscan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:964–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yo IK, Kwon OS, Park JW, et al. The factors associated with longitudinal changes in liver stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2015;21:32–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaiani S, Gramantieri L, Venturoli N, et al. What is the criterion for differentiating chronic hepatitis from compensated cirrhosis? A prospective study comparing ultrasonography and percutaneous liver biopsy. J Hepatol. 1997;27:979–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Miyeon Lee for assisting with the statistical analysis for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi Sung Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical considerations

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was waived.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M.S., Kim, B.I., Kwon, HJ. et al. Discordance between conventional ultrasonography and ElastPQ for assessing hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: frequency and independent factors. J Med Ultrasonics 43, 201–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0684-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-015-0684-7

Keywords

Navigation