Skip to main content
Log in

Giant peripancreatic artery aneurysm with emphasis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: report of two cases

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visceral artery aneurysms have a potential possibility of rupture with life-threatening hemorrhage, and prompt detection and optimal treatment are required clinically. Actually, abdominal ultrasound plays a major role in detection of visceral artery aneurysms. Besides, the administration of contrast agents can highly improve the characterization of the lesion. Herein, we present two cases of giant peripancreatic artery aneurysm with emphasis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Case 1 was a 54-year-old asymptomatic man who was diagnosed with a 12.1 cm × 5.2 cm splenic artery aneurysm in the absence of a clear etiologic factor. Case 2 was a 37-year-old man with a 6.3 cm × 5.3 cm pancreaticoduodenal artery pseudoaneurysm associated with chronic pancreatitis. Both diagnoses were confirmed by contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) and digital subtracted angiography (DSA). Transcatheter embolization occlusion using coiling was successfully performed for both cases. Postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed complete occlusion. It is suggested that CEUS seems to be a promising diagnostic option and contributes to preoperative treatment planning for patients with peripancreatic artery aneurysm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Splenic artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: clinical distinctions and CT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:992–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pescarus R, Montreuil B, Bendavid Y. Giant splenic artery aneurysms: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:344–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Badea R, Chiorean L, Chira O, Caraiani C. Associated gastroduodenal artery aneurysm aortic aneurysm: the diagnostic contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in correlation with computed tomography angiography. J Med Ultrason. 2014;41:217–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tessier DJ, Stone WM, Fowl RJ, et al. Clinical features and management of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm: case series and cumulative review of literature. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:969–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballinas-Oseguera GA, Martinez-Ordaz JL, Sinco-Najera TG, et al. Management of pseudoaneurysm of the splenic artery: report of two cases. Cir Cir. 2011;79:268–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kalva SP, Yeddula K, Wicky S, et al. Angiographic intervention in patients with a suspected visceral artery pseudoaneurysm complicating pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146:647–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikeda O, Nakasone Y, Tamura Y, et al. Endovascular management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: transcatheter coil embolization using the isolation technique. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2010;33:1128–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JY, Ryu H, Bang S, et al. Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm associated with plastic biliary stent. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:546–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Helck A, Hoffmann RT, Sommer WH, et al. Diagnosis, therapy monitoring and follow up of renal artery pseudoaneurysm with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in three cases. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2010;46:127–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piscaglia F, Gualandi S, Galassi M, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography for the evaluation of coil embolization of splenic artery aneurysm. Circulation. 2010;122:e451–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohyama Y, Ishida H, Yoshida C, et al. Pseudoaneurysm in a chronic pancreatitis patient: report of a case, with emphasis on contrast-enhanced sonograms. J Med Ultrason. 2010;37:75–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Catalano O, Lobianco R, Cusati B, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography for diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:423–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clevert DA, Stickel M, Flach P, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detection and follow-up of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with aorto-caval fistula and endovascular treatment. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2007;30:480–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L, et al. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2004;25:249–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Xie.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Zhou, L., Liu, M. et al. Giant peripancreatic artery aneurysm with emphasis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: report of two cases. J Med Ultrasonics 42, 103–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0572-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-014-0572-6

Keywords

Navigation