Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is there any relation between umbilical artery and vein diameter and estimated fetal weight in healthy pregnant women?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between umbilical vessel diameter and estimated fetal weight (EFW) and other fetal biometric parameters, and to assess the role of umbilical vessel diameter in prediction of EFW. Umbilical vein/umbilical artery (UV/UA) ratio and its relation to EFW were also examined.

Methods

A prospective study was designed to assess the sonographic diameter of UA and UV in 720 low-risk pregnant women at 20–40 weeks’ gestation. Fetal biometry, EFW, and umbilical vessel measurements were performed.

Results

There were strong correlations between umbilical vessel diameter versus gestational age and EFW. Umbilical vessel diameters increased linearly up to 34 weeks, after which they plateaued. No relation was found between EFW versus UV/UA ratio and gestational age versus UV/UA.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, it is not possible at present to recommend the use of umbilical vessel diameters for prediction of EFW after 34 weeks, but it may be helpful under 34 weeks. UV/UA ratio is not useful for prediction and management of complicated pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ott WJ. Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1710–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH. Fetal macrosomia: prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:715–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Todros T, Adamson SL, Guiot C, Bankowski E, Raio L, Di Naro E, Schneider H. Umbilical cord and fetal growth—a workshop report. Placenta. 2002;23:130–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weissman A, Jakobi P, Bronshtein M, Goldstein I. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord and vessels during normal pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:11–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun Y, Arbuckle S, Hocking G, Billson V. Umbilical cord stricture and intrauterine fetal death. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1995;15:723–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weissman A, Jakobi P. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:691–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Gomez R, Franchi M, Mazor M, Bruhwiler H. Sonographic measurements of the umbilical cord and fetal anthropometric parameters. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;83:131–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with use of head, body and femur measurements––a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kayem G, Grangé G, Bréart G, Goffinet F. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saqib R, Siddiqui TS, Siddiqui TS, Fatima S. Estimation of foetal weight in third trimester using thigh measurements. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20:92–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nardozza LM, Vieira MF, Junior EA, Rolo LC, Moron AF. Prediction of birth weight using fetal thigh and upper-arm volumes by three-dimensional ultrasonography in a Brazilian population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;11:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Deter RL, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF, Romero R. Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:441–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dilmen G, Turhan NO, Toppare MF, Seçkin N, Oztürk M, Göksin E. Scapula length measurement for assessment of fetal growth and development. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21:139–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Brühwiler H, D’Addario V, Schneider H. First-trimester sonographic umbilical cord diameter and the growth of the human embryo. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:348–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST. The umbilical cord thickness measured at 18–23 weeks of gestational age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:111–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Togni FA, Araujo E Jr, Vasques FA, Moron AF, Torloni MR, Nardozza LM. The cross-sectional area of umbilical cord components in normal pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96:156–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Togni FA, Araujo E Jr, Moron AF, Vasques FA, Torloni MR, Nardozza LM, Guimarães Filho HA. Reference intervals for the cross sectional area of the umbilical cord during gestation. J Perinat Med. 2007;35:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Balestreri D, D’Addario V. Nomogram of Wharton’s jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:121–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Buttarelli M, Schneider H. First-trimester umbilical cord diameter: a novel marker of fetal aneuploidy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Maymon E, Mueller MD, Brühwiler H. Prenatal diagnosis of a lean umbilical cord: a simple marker for the fetus at risk of being small for gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:176–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Franchi M, Bolla D, Schneider H. Altered sonographic umbilical cord morphometry in early-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V, Lanzillotti G, Schneider H. Umbilical vein blood flow in fetuses with normal and lean umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:224–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goodlin RC. Fetal dysmaturity, ‘lean cord’, and fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Silver RK, Dooley SL, Tamura RK, Depp R. Umbilical cord size and amniotic fluid volume in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:716–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall SP. The thin cord syndrome. A review with a report of two cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;18:507–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barbieri C, Cecatti JG, Krupa F, Marussi EF, Costa JV. Validation study of the capacity of the reference curves of ultrasonographic measurements of the umbilical cord to identify deviations in estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:286–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, Siesto G, Bergamini V, Raio L. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:861–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fatih University, Ankara, Turkey

    Aydın Köşüş & Nermin Köşüş

  2. Ostim Mah. 1290. Sok, Nevbahar Konutları A7 Blok, No: 43, Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey

    Nermin Köşüş

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Muğla University, Muğla, Turkey

    Nilgün Ö. Turhan

Authors
  1. Aydın Köşüş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nermin Köşüş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nilgün Ö. Turhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nermin Köşüş.

About this article

Cite this article

Köşüş, A., Köşüş, N. & Turhan, N.Ö. Is there any relation between umbilical artery and vein diameter and estimated fetal weight in healthy pregnant women?. J Med Ultrasonics 39, 227–234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0360-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0360-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation