Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers to cervical screening participation in high-risk women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Women aged 25–35 years, for whom cervical cancer is most problematic, are least likely to participate in the cervical screening programme. Therefore, identifying barriers to screening participation in this high-risk group is essential.

Subject and methods

A sample of 430 women completed an electronic survey of their cervical screening history and answered questions on sociodemographic, behavioural, attitudinal and informational barriers to cervical screening uptake. Logistic regression was used to predict cervical screening non attendance.

Results

Women with more than 10 sexual partners in their lifetime were more likely, but women from ethnic minorities, less likely to participate in the cervical screening programme. Women unaware of the recommended screening interval were also less likely to be screened, as were women who believed that screening is a test for cancer. Screening was also less likely among women who endorsed the belief that screening in the absence of symptoms is unnecessary.

Conclusion

These data highlight poor knowledge of the recommended screening interval and purpose of cervical cancer screening in this high-risk group. As such, interventions that target these informational barriers might be most effective for increasing cervical screening uptake in this high-risk group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amankwah E, Ngwakongnwi E, Quan H (2009) Why many visible minority women in Canada do not participate in cervical cancer screening. Ethnicity Health 14(4):337–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bang JY, Yadegarfar G, Soljak M, Majeed A (2012) Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England. J Public Health 34:532–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CR-UK (2010) Cervical cancer incidence statistics. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerinfo/cancerstats/types/cervix/incidence/. Accessed 6 Jan 2014

  • Eaker S, Adami H, Spare P (2001) Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden. Prev Med 32:482–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hadad ARM (2005) Effect of a supportive educational intervention on cervical cancer screening for minority women. PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles

  • Franceschi S et al (2009) Differences in the risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection by education level. Brit J Cancer 101:865–870

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BT et al (2011) Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women. BMC Public Health 11:264

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lancuck L et al (2010) A fall-off in cervical screening coverage of younger women in developed countries. J Med Screen 17(2):91–96

  • Lostao L, Joiner TE, Pettit JW (2001) Health beliefs and illness attitudes as predictors of breast cancer screening attendance. Eur J Public Health 11:274–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHSCSP (2012) NHS Cancer Screening Programme, Annual review. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/2012review.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2013

  • Olesen SC, Butterworth P, Jacomb P, Tait RJ (2012) Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research. BMC Health Serv Res 12:34

  • Oscarsson MG, Wijma BE, Benzein EG (2008) I do not need to… I do not want to… I do not give it priority…why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening. Health Expec 11:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE (2004) The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 364(9430):249–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rimer B (1999) The impact of tailored interventions on a community health centre population. Patient Educ Counsel 37:125–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tacken MAJB et al (2006) Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands is mainly influenced by women’s beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Public Health 17(2):178–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L, Wardle J (2012) Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG 119:26–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LP, Wong YL, Low WY, Khoo EM, Shuib R (2008) Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Med 15:289–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Lovell.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lovell, B., Wetherell, M.A. & Shepherd, L. Barriers to cervical screening participation in high-risk women. J Public Health 23, 57–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0649-0

Keywords

Navigation