Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilization of partition analysis to evaluate the incidence on deep vein thrombosis following esophagectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We performed a retrospective observational study to examine the involvement of suspicious factors and causes of deep vein thrombosis using cases of esophagectomy that were done to treat esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

The 144 patients received esophagectomy in Okayama University Hospital from January 2005 to June 2007. All patients had an enhanced CT or an ultrasound examination after their operations. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was then determined. For cases that found deep vein thrombosis, the anticoagulant treatment was strengthened. When the thrombosis was already so large to be seen in the inferior vena cava, the IVC filter was left to prevent a pulmonary embolism. Using JMP5.0.1 statistical analysis software, we analyzed the relationship between various clinical factors and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis.

Results

Using JMP5.0.1, factors causing deep vein thrombosis were analyzed and partitioning was done. The most significant risk factor causing deep vein thrombosis is leaving the central venous catheter inserted into the inguinal femoral area. Logistic analysis also showed that only the catheter if inserted from the inguinal femoral area, was significantly related to cause deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.0055). No other factor was a significant risk to cause deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusions

We analyzed the relationship between suspicious factors and the causes of deep vein thrombosis in cases of esophagectomy. The most relevant factors were inserting the central venous catheter from the inguinal femoral route. This evidence can be applied to both pre-operative and postoperative management to prevent deep vein thrombosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:381S–453S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, Clarke-Pearson D, Flowers C, Jahanzeb M, Kakkar A, Kuderer NM, Levine MN, Liebman H, Mendelson D, Raskob G, Somerfield MR, Thodiyil P, Trent D, Francis CW. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5490–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126:338S–400S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293:715–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber O, Bounameaux H, Borst F, Rohner A. Postoperative pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge. An underestimated risk. Arch Surg. 1992;127:310–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levitan N, Dowlati A, Remick SC, Tahsildar HI, Sivinski LD, Beyth R, Rimm AA. Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999;78:285–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics. Thromb Haemost. 2002;87:575–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thodiyil PA, Kakkar AK. Variation in relative risk of venous thromboembolism in different cancers. Thromb Haemost. 2002;87:1076–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein PD, Beemath A, Meyers FA, Skaf E, Olson RE. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with sickle cell disease. Am J Med. 2006;119:897e7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morris RJ, Woodcock JP. Evidence-based compression: prevention of stasis and deep vein thrombosis. Ann Surg. 2004;239:162–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prevention of fatal postoperative pulmonary embolism by low doses of heparin. An international multicentre trial. Lancet. 1975;2:45–51.

  12. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, Shah AA, Sherman L, Lewis A, Rademaker J, Pearson G, Choi J, Wolff W, Prabhu PM, Galanski M, Clark RA, Sostman HD, Henschke CI. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology. 2000;216:744–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coche EE, Hamoir XL, Hammer FD, Hainaut P, Goffette PP. Using dual-detector helical CT angiography to detect deep venous thrombosis in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism: diagnostic value and additional findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1035–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakon M, Maehara Y, Yoshikawa H, Akaza H. Incidence of venous thromboembolism following major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective epidemiological study in Japan. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:581–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Debourdeau P, Pavic M, Zammit C, Aletti M, Pogant C, Colle B. Post-treatment surveillance for potentially curable malignancies. Presse Med. 2007;36:949–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beckers MM, Ruven HJ, Seldenrijk CA, Prins MH, Biesma DH. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer. Thromb Res. 2010;125:318–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee AY, Levine MN, Butler G, Webb C, Costantini L, Gu C, Julian JA. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of catheter-related thrombosis in adult patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1404–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akl EA, Karmath G, Yosuico V, Kim SY, Barba M, Sperati F, Cook D, Schunemann HJ. Anticoagulation for thrombosis prophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007:CD006468.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakon M, Kakkar AK, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Nakamori S, Yano M, Monden M. Current status of pulmonary embolism in general surgery in Japan. Surg Today. 2004;34:805–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagman LD, Baird MF, Bennett CL, Bockenstedt PL, Cataland SR, Fanikos J, Fogarty PF, Goldhaber SZ, Grover TS, Haire W, Hassoun H, Hutchinson S, Jahanzeb M, Lee J, Linenberger ML, Millenson MM, Ortel TL, Salem R, Smith JL, Streiff MB, Vedantham S. Venous thromboembolic disease. NCCN. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2008;6:716–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Joynt GM, Kew J, Gomersall CD, Leung VY, Liu EK. Deep venous thrombosis caused by femoral venous catheters in critically ill adult patients. Chest. 2000;117:178–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre E, Rigaud JP, Casciani D, Misset B, Bosquet C, Outin H, Brun-Buisson C, French Catheter Study Group in Intensive Care. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286:700–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshio Naomoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fujiwara, Y., Yamatsuji, T., Tanabe, S. et al. Utilization of partition analysis to evaluate the incidence on deep vein thrombosis following esophagectomy. Esophagus 10, 1–5 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-012-0350-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-012-0350-8

Keywords

Navigation