Skip to main content
Log in

Money demand in the euro area: new insights from disaggregated data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional money demand specifications in the euro area have become unstable since 2001. We specify a money demand equation in deviations of individual euro area Member States variables from the euro area average and show that the income elasticity as well as the interest rate semi-elasticity remain stable. The corresponding deep parameters of the utility function have not changed fundamentally. Aggregate money demand instability does therefore not result from altered standard factors determining the preference for holding money. Instead, other factors determine the aggregate monetary overhang. Since monetary developments cannot easily be explained by changing preferences, they should be closely monitored as they may actually be a sign of other factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When specifying a money demand equation, this phenomenon can be taken into account by formulating a non-linear relationship between the money stock variables and the interest rate variable(s) and/or by specifying interest rates in log-form which implies that a precentage point reduction in nominal interest rates has a proportionally greater impact upon money holdings the lower the level of interest rates.

  2. Driscoll (2004) specifies a money demand equation in deviations of US states from the US average.

  3. National contributions to euro area M3 exclude currency in circulation as its location cannot be determined. A country’s national contributions to euro area monetary aggregates are defined as liabilities of domestic monetary financial institutions (MFI) to the whole euro area non-MFI sector. As such, e.g., German households’ and enterprises’ short-term deposits held with branches and subsidiaries of German MFIs in Luxembourg are part of Luxembourg’s contribution to euro area M3. However, the amount of deposits from and loans to euro area residents outside the domestic country is very low. As such, it can be assumed that national contributions to M3 are driven by macroeconomic developments in the individual euro area countries.

  4. Data are computed by adding and subtracting the following components of the “Aggregated balance sheet of euro area monetary financial institutions, excluding the Eurosystem”: 2.2 − 2.2.1 − 2.2.2 − 2.2.3.2.3 − 2.2.3.3.2 + 2.3 + 2.4 − 2.4.3.

  5. Dynamic OLS was originally developed by Stock and Watson (1993), Kao and Chiang (2000) analyze its properties in a panel context. See also Kao et al. (1999) and Pesaran and Smith (1995).

References

  • Alves N, Marques CR, Sousa J (2007) Is the euro area M3 abandoning us? Working paper no. 20/2007, Banco de Portugal

  • Arnold J, Roelands S (2010) The demand for euros. J Macroecon 323(2):674–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banque de France (2006) Re-examining the money demand function for the euro area. Discussion paper no. 150, Bulletin Digest

  • Barigozzi M, Conti A (2010) On the sources of euro area money demand stability. A time varying cointegration analysis. ECARES working paper, University of Brussels, 2010-022

  • Belke A, Czuday R (2012) Is euro area money demand (still) stable? Cointegrated VAR versus single equation techniques. Appl Econ Q 56(4):285–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer A (2009) A stable model for euro area money demand: revisiting the role of wealth. ECB working paper, 1111

  • Boone L, van den Noord P (2008) Wealth effects on money demand in the euro area. Empir Econ 34(3):525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand C, Cassola N (2004) A money demand system for euro area M3. Appl Econ 36(8):817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggeman A, Donati P, Warne A (2003) Is the demand for euro area M3 stable? Working paper series 255, European Central Bank

  • Calza A, Sousa J (2003) Why has broad money demand been more stable in the euro area than in other economies? A literature review. Discussion paper 261, ECB working paper

  • Calza A, Gerdesmeier D, Levy JVF (2001) Euro area money demand: measuring the opportunity costs appropriately. IMF working papers 01/179, International Monetary Fund

  • Carlson JB, Hoffman DL, Keen BD, Rasche RH (2000) Results of a study of the stability of cointegrating relations comprised on board monetary aggregates. J Monet Econ 46(2):345–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen K, Hagen J, Hossfeld O, Neaves AS K (2003) Is European money demand still stable? Kiel working papers 1179, Kiel Institute for the World Economy

  • Carstensen K (2006) Stock market downswing and the stability of European monetary union money demand. J Bus Econ Stat 25(4):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen K, Hagen J, Hossfeld O, Salazar Neaves A (2009) Money demand stability and inflation prediction in the four largest EMU countries. Scottish J Political Economy 56(1):73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen G, Vega J-L (2001) The demand for M3 in the euro area. J Appl Econ 16(6):727–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis RA, Favero CA, Roffia B (2008) Euro area money demand and international portfolio allocation—a contribution to assessing risks to price stability. Working paper series 926, European Central Bank

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2007) Globalization and monetary policy. Discussion paper October, Monthly Bulletin

  • Dobnik F (2011) Long-run money demand in OECD countries, cross member cointegration. Ruhr Economic Papers

  • Dreger C, Wolters J (2010) Investigating M3 money demand in the euro area: new evidence based on standard models. J Int Money Financ 29(561):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll JC (2004) Does bank lending affect output? Evidence from the US states. J Monet Econ 51(3):451–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero G, Nobili A, Passiglia P (2007) The sectoral distribution of money supply in the euro area. Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 627, Bank of Italy, Economic Research Department

  • Fischer B, Lenza M, Pill H, Reichlin L (2009) Monetary analysis and monetary policy in the euro Area 1999–2006. J Int Money Financ 28(7):1138–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1988) Money and the stock market. J Polit Econ 96(2):221–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese JV, Tuxen CK (2008) Global liquidity, asset prices and monetary policy: evidence from cointegrated VAR models. Discussion paper, Oxford University

  • Greiber C, Lemke W (2005) Money demand and macroeconomic uncertainty. Discussion paper series 1: economic studies 2005,26, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre

  • Greiber C, Setzer R (2007) Money and housing: evidence for the euro area and the US. Discussion paper series 1: economic studies 2007,12, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre

  • Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econom J 3:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang M (2000) On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Advances in econometrics, vol 15. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp 179–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Chiang M-H, Chen B (1999) International R&D spillovers: an application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(4):693–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (2000) Constructing and estimating a realistic optimizing model of monetary policy. J Monet Econ 45:329–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontolemis Z (2002) Money demand in the euro area: where do we stand (today)? IMF working paper no. 185, International Monetary Fund

  • MacKinnon JG, Haug A, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. J Appl Econ 14(5):563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautz D, Rondorf U (2011) The (in)stability of money demand in the euro area: lessons from a cross-country analysis. Empirica 38:539–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61(4):631–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(0):653–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran M, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econom 68(1):79–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharnagl M (1998) The Stability of german money demand: not just a myth. Empir Econ 23:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setzer R, van den Noord P, Wolff G (2011) Heterogeneity in money holdings across euro area countries: the role of housing. Eur J Polit Econ 27:764–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock J, Watson M (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61(4):783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber A (2006) European financial integration and (its implications for) monetary policy. In: Keynote address at the annual general meeting 2006 of the Foreign Bankers’ Association in the Netherlands, 23 May 2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Setzer.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are the author’s alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Johansen cointegration rank tests (trace statistics)
Table 6 Overview of money demand studies for the euro area since 2001 (selection)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Setzer, R., Wolff, G.B. Money demand in the euro area: new insights from disaggregated data. Int Econ Econ Policy 10, 297–315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0214-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0214-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation