Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: the clinical and economic benefit in elderly patients

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

We performed this study to investigate the feasibility and clinical and financial benefit of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elderly patients undergoing colorectal resections.

Methods

Patients over the age of 65 undergoing open colorectal resections at the department of surgery of the Motol University Hospital in Prague between January 2015 and August 2017 were included in the study. Patients who received ERAS perioperative care formed the ERAS group and patients who received standard perioperative care formed the control group. Adherence to the ERAS protocol, hospitalisation length, readmission rate, 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality, and treatment costs were analysed.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included in the ERAS group and sixty-one in the control group. Patient and surgical characteristics were similar in the two groups. An adherence of 83.8% to the ERAS protocol was achieved. Recovery parameters were improved and hospital stay length was shortened, while readmission rate, morbidity and mortality. Although not statistically significant, treatment costs were reduced by an average of €1187 per patient.

Conclusion

We showed that our enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery protocol in elderly patients is feasible, effective, safe and reduces treatment costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2014;38:1531–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemanu DP, Singh PP, Stowers MD, et al. A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:338–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Chuck A, et al. Cost impact analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2016;23:e221–e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thanh NX, Chuck AW, Wasylak T, et al. An economic evaluation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) multisite implementation program for colorectal surgery in Alberta. Can J Surg. 2016;59:415–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:667–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Q, Suo J, Jiang J, et al. Effectiveness of fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients: A randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1009–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lau CS, Chamberlain RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve patient outcomes and recovery: A meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41:899–913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bugada D, Bellini V, Fanelli A, et al. Future perspectives of ERAS: A narrative review on the new applications of an established approach. Surg Res Pract. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3561249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH, et al. A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:947–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;2017(67):177–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saxton A, Velanovich V. Preoperative frailty and quality of life as predictors of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2011;253:1223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandini M, Pinotti E, Persico I, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality after major abdominal surgery. BJS Open. 2017;1:128–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Venara A, Barbieux J, Mucci S, et al. Short-term outcomes of colorectal resection for cancer in elderly in the era of enhanced recovery. Scand J Surg. 2018;107:31–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Ayora S, Pastor C, Guadalajara H, et al. Enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Compliance and outcomes of a multicenter study from the Spanish working group on ERAS. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31:1625–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsmo HM, Erichsen C, Rasdal A, et al. Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery (ERAS) in elderly patients is feasible and achieves similar results as in younger patients. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721417706299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the doctors and nursing staff of the Department of Surgery of the Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital for their devoted care of our patients.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Kocián M.D. Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

P. Kocián, A. Whitley, P. Přikryl, M. Bocková, D. Hodyc, B. Čermáková, T. Vymazal and J. Hoch declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional ethical board (reference no. EK-760/18).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kocián, P., Whitley, A., Přikryl, P. et al. Enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery: the clinical and economic benefit in elderly patients. Eur Surg 51, 183–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0595-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0595-8

Keywords

Navigation