Skip to main content
Log in

Loop Ileostomy Morbidity: Timing of Closure Matters

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Diverting stomas are commonly performed during ileoanal and coloanal anastomoses. We studied a series of patients after loop ileostomy closure to determine risk factors and the impact of the interval from primary operation on morbidity.

Methods

Ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure at a single institution after coloanal or ileoanal anastomosis were retrospectively reviewed. Complications were classified as medical or surgical according to its treatment requirements. Results were correlated to clinical and operative features.

Results

Of the 93 patients, 43 were male and 50 were female with mean age of 56 years. Overall, complication rate was 17.2 percent. The most common complication was small-bowel obstruction. Complications required operative management in 3.2 percent and medical management alone in 14 percent. There was no mortality. There was no correlation between complication occurrence and age, gender, type of suture (manual or mechanical), and operative time. Complications were significantly associated with primary disease and shorter interval between primary operation and ileostomy closure. Regarding the optimal interval between primary surgery and ileostomy closure, the cutoff value for increased risk of developing postoperative complications was 8.5 weeks, below which the risk of such occurrence was significantly higher with a sensitivity rate of 88 percent.

Conclusions

Diverting loop ileostomy adds little cumulative morbidity to the primary operation and is a safe option for diversion to protect a low colorectal anastomosis. To further reduce morbidity, the interval between primary operation and ileostomy closure should be no shorter than 8.5 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S Fasth L Hulten (1984) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy: a superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery World J Surg 8 401–407 Occurrence Handle6464495 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuB2snivVY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01655089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P Wara K Sorensen V Berg (1981) ArticleTitleProximal fecal diversion: review of ten years' experience Dis Colon Rectum 24 114–119 Occurrence Handle7215073 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C28zptVU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JC Goligher NG Graham FT Dombal ParticleDe (1970) ArticleTitleAnastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid Br J Surg 57 109–118 Occurrence Handle5467147 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS%2BC38fivVE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. JD Cheape VH Hooks Suffix3rd (1994) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy: a reliable method of diversion South Med J 87 370–374 Occurrence Handle8134860 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC1c3hs1c%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DP Edwards A Leppington-Clarke R Sexton RJ Heald BJ Moran (2001) ArticleTitleStoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial Br J Surg 88 360–363 Occurrence Handle11260099 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtVaqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01727.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. NS Williams DG Nasmyth D Jones AH Smith (1986) ArticleTitleDe-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy Br J Surg 73 566–570 Occurrence Handle3524742 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimB2s%2FotVw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. AW Gooszen RH Geelkerken J Hermans MB Lagaay HG Gooszen (1998) ArticleTitleTemporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy Br J Surg 85 76–79 Occurrence Handle9462389 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7itl2nsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00526.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J Torkington N Khetan MH Jamison (1998) ArticleTitleTemporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy Br J Surg 85 1452 Occurrence Handle9782041 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvltlejsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y Sakai H Nelson D Larson L Maidl T Young-Fadok D Ilstrup (2001) ArticleTitleTemporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study Arch Surg 136 338–342 Occurrence Handle11231858 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ps1Ogug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.136.3.338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. WL Law KW Chu HK Choi (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision Br J Surg 89 704–708 Occurrence Handle12027979 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383ovVSqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I Gastinger F Marusch R Steinert S Wolff F Koeckerling H Lippert (2005) ArticleTitleProtective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 92 1137–1142 Occurrence Handle15997447 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.5045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DP Berry JH Scholefield (1997) ArticleTitleClosure of loop ileostomy Br J Surg 84 524 Occurrence Handle9112907 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB28jlslM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.1800840424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A Habr-Gama RO Perez DR Kiss et al. (2004) ArticleTitlePreoperative chemoradiation therapy for low rectal cancer. Impact on downstaging and sphincter-saving operations Hepatogastroenterology 51 1703–1707 Occurrence Handle15532809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A Habr-Gama RO Perez W Nadalin et al. (2005) ArticleTitleLong-term results of preoperative chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer correlation between final stage and survival J Gastrointest Surg 9 90–99 Occurrence Handle15623449 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.gassur.2004.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PC Shellito (1998) ArticleTitleComplications of abdominal stoma surgery Dis Colon Rectum 41 1562–1572 Occurrence Handle9860339 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FnsFKrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. E Carlsen AB Bergan (1999) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy: technical aspects and complications Eur J Surg 165 140–143 Occurrence Handle10192571 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gs1Oruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1080/110241599750007324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. CM Aston WG Everett (1984) ArticleTitleComparison of early and late closure of transverse loop colostomies Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66 331–333 Occurrence Handle6486667 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FitFSmug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DF Altomare OC Pannarale L Lupo N Palasciano V Memeo M Rubino (1990) ArticleTitleProtective colostomy closure: the hazards of a “minor” operation Int J Colorectal Dis 5 73–78 Occurrence Handle2358740 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB1MzlvFA%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00298472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. LJ Mann PJ Stewart RJ Goodwin PH Chapuis EL Bokey (1991) ArticleTitleComplications following closure of loop ileostomy ANZ J Surg 61 493–496 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6A3MrjtlQ%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. PT Phang JM Hain JJ Perez-Ramirez RD Madoff BT Gemlo (1999) ArticleTitleTechniques and complications of ileostomy takedown Am J Surg 177 463–466 Occurrence Handle10414694 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzktFKlsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00091-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. KP Riesener W Lehnen M Hofer R Kasperk JC Braun V Schumpelick (1997) ArticleTitleMorbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment World J Surg 21 103–108 Occurrence Handle8943186 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC3c3mtFM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A Kestenberg JM Becker (1985) ArticleTitleA new technique of loop ileostomy closure after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis Surgery 98 109–111 Occurrence Handle4012600 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB2critVw%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. TL Hull I Kobe VW Fazio (1996) ArticleTitleComparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures Dis Colon Rectum 39 1086–1089 Occurrence Handle8831520 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymH38fktFM%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02081405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. IM Bain R Patel MR Keighley (1996) ArticleTitleComparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78 555–6 Occurrence Handle8943644 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD1Mbgs1M%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. SN Amin MA Memon NC Armitage JH Scholefield (2001) ArticleTitleDefunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83 246–249 Occurrence Handle11518371 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvnsFSgsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. H Hasegawa S Radley DG Morton MR Keighley (2000) ArticleTitleStapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 231 202–4 Occurrence Handle10674611 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslSktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200002000-00008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Turnbull RB Jr, Weakley FL. Ileostomy technics and indications for surgery. Rev Surg 1966;23(5):310–4

    Google Scholar 

  28. HD Pavoordt Particlevan de VW Fazio DG Jagelman IC Lavery FL Weakley (1987) ArticleTitleThe outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases Int J Colorectal Dis 2 214–217 Occurrence Handle3320231 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01649508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. T Petit J Maurel G Lebreton C Javois M Gignoux P Segol (1999) ArticleTitleResults and indications of lateral ileostomy functionally terminated in colorectal surgery Ann Chir 53 949–953 Occurrence Handle10670139 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jsFSgtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E Rullier N Toux ParticleLe C Laurent JL Garrelon M Parneix J Saric (2001) ArticleTitleLoop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery World J Surg 25 274–277 Occurrence Handle11343175 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ktFOhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002680020091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. JP Thomson PR Hawley (1972) ArticleTitleResults of closure of loop transverse colostomies BMJ 3 459–462 Occurrence Handle5069224 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE3s%2FgtFWltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.3.5824.459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Oliva Perez M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Perez, R.O., Habr-Gama, A., Seid, V.E. et al. Loop Ileostomy Morbidity: Timing of Closure Matters. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 1539–1545 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0645-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0645-8

Key words

Navigation