Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Consequences of First Vaginal Delivery-Induced Anal Sphincter Defect

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the long-term consequences of anal sphincter defects detected after a first vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A cohort of 197 primiparous females was evaluated for anal continence and anal sphincter defects in 1997. In June 2003 (6 years later), a postal questionnaire was sent to 74 females of this cohort, and answers from 54 (73 percent) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 1997, a transanal ultrasound found 66 anal sphincter defects (33.5 percent). Twenty-one females (10.6 percent) had persistent signs of anal incontinence 12 weeks after the index delivery. There was a significant correlation between the presence of anal sphincter defect and anal incontinence. Six years later, 11 of 54 females reported signs of anal incontinence: 50 percent of females with anal sphincter defect and only 8.1 percent of females without (P = 0.002). Large defects were more frequently associated with anal incontinence. Anal incontinence after the index vaginal delivery also was significantly associated with anal incontinence six years later. Multivariate analysis showed anal sphincter defect to be the only variable predictive of anal incontinence (odds ratio, 10.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.1–52.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Anal sphincter defects detected after the first vaginal delivery appear as the main risk factor for anal incontinence six years later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. JS Kalantar S Howell NJ Talley (2002) ArticleTitlePrevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med J Aust 176 54–7 Occurrence Handle11936284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S Perry C Shaw C McGrother et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePrevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community Gut 50 480–4 Occurrence Handle11889066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. GD Chen SW Hu YC Chen TL Lin LY Lin (2003) ArticleTitlePrevalence and correlations of anal incontinence and constipation in Taiwanese women Neurourol Urodyn 22 664–9 Occurrence Handle10.1002/nau.10067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S Snooks M Setchell M Swash M Henry (1984) ArticleTitleInjury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth Lancet 2 546–50 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90766-9 Occurrence Handle6147604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. MA Kamm (1994) ArticleTitleObstetric damage and faecal incontinence Lancet 344 730–3 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92213-6 Occurrence Handle7915781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AH Sultan MA Kamm CN Hudson JM Thomas CI Bartram (1993) ArticleTitleAnal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery N Engl J Med 329 1905–11 Occurrence Handle8247054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. M Oberwalder J Connor SD Wexner (2003) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage Br J Surg 90 1333–7 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4369 Occurrence Handle14598410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L Abramowitz I Sobhani R Ganansia et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAre sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study Dis Colon Rectum 43 590–8 Occurrence Handle10826416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. S Karoui C Savoye-Collet E Koning AM Leroi P Denis (1999) ArticleTitlePrevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 389–92 Occurrence Handle10430142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JM Jorge SD Wexner (1993) ArticleTitleEtiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36 77–97 Occurrence Handle8416784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A Groutz G Fait JB Lessing et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIncidence and obstetric risk factors of postpartum anal incontinence Scand J Gastroenterol 34 315–8 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00365529950173753 Occurrence Handle10232879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. UM Peschers AH Sultan K Jundt A Mayer V Drinovac T Dimpfl (2003) ArticleTitleUrinary and anal incontinence after vacuum delivery Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110 39–42 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00111-8 Occurrence Handle12932869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. W Hall K McCracken P Osterweil JM Guise (2003) ArticleTitleFrequency and predictors for postpartum fecal incontinence Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 1205–7 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mob.2003.333 Occurrence Handle12748479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. C MacArthur CM Glazener PD Wilson (2001) ArticleTitleObstetric practice and faecal incontinence three months after delivery Br J Obstet Gynaecol 108 678–83 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00183-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H Damon L Henry S Bretones G Mellier Y Minaire F Mion (2000) ArticleTitlePostdelivery anal function in primiparous females: ultrasound and manometric study Dis Colon Rectum 43 472–7 Occurrence Handle10789741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Mion Ph.D..

Additional information

Supported in part by a regional PHRC grant (HCL-PHRC 02.113).

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Damon, H., Bretones, S., Henry, L. et al. Long-Term Consequences of First Vaginal Delivery-Induced Anal Sphincter Defect. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1772–1776 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0075-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0075-z

Key words

Navigation