Skip to main content
Log in

Rectal Wall Properties in Patients With Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord Lesions

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most patients with spinal cord injuries suffer from constipation or fecal incontinence. This study was designed to observe rectal wall properties and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord injury. METHODS: Rectal wall properties were studied by rectal impedance planimetry, a method for simultaneous registration of pressure and rectal cross-sectional area during distention. Twenty-five patients with spinal cord injury (14 with supraconal lesions and 11 with conal/cauda equina lesions) were studied one to four weeks after injury, and 17 were available for follow-up after 6 to 14 months. Results were compared with 15 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Rectal tone was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than normal in patients with acute and chronic supraconal lesions but significantly lower (P < 0.05) in patients with acute and chronic conal/cauda equina lesions. The proportion of subjects with single giant rectal contractions was significantly higher than normal (33 percent) after acute supraconal spinal cord injury (77 percent; P = 0.02) but not after acute conal/cauda equina lesions (45 percent; P = 0.69). Phasic giant contractions only occurred in patients with spinal cord injury (once or more in 8 of 25 patients), but they were not correlated with the level of the lesion. Rectal tone and the number of giant rectal contractions did not change significantly from the acute to the chronic phase of spinal cord injury. The amplitude of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex at distention pressures of 5 and 10 cm H2O was significantly lower than normal in patients with acute and chronic conal/cauda equina lesions (acute, −5 and 44 percent vs. 37 and 82 percent (P < 0.05); chronic, 6 percent (P < 0.05) and 66 percent (P = NS)) but not in patients with supraconal spinal cord injury (acute, 32 and 83 percent; chronic, 61 and 85 percent (all P = NS)). CONCLUSION: Rectal tone is stimulated by the sacral spinal cord but inhibited by supraspinal centers within the central nervous system. Likewise, rectal contractility is inhibited by supraspinal centers, and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex is stimulated by the sacral spinal cord. Alterations caused by either type of spinal cord lesion are present after one to four weeks and do not change significantly within the first year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S Glickman MA Kamm (1996) ArticleTitleBowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients Lancet 347 1651–1653

    Google Scholar 

  2. K Krogh J Nielsen JC Djurhuus C Mosdal S Sabroe S Laurberg (1997) ArticleTitleColorectal function in patients with spinal cord lesions Dis Colon Rectum 40 1233–1239

    Google Scholar 

  3. D Harari M Sarkarati JH Gurwitz G McGlinchey-Berroth KL Minaker (1997) ArticleTitleConstipation-related symptoms and bowel program concerning individuals with spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 35 394–401

    Google Scholar 

  4. R Menter D Weitzenkamp D Cooper J Bingley S Charlifue G Whiteneck (1997) ArticleTitleBowel management outcomes in individuals with long-term spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord 35 608–612

    Google Scholar 

  5. WM Sun R MacDonagh D Forster R Smallwood NW Read (1995) ArticleTitleAnorectal function in patients with complete spinal transsection before and after posterior rhizotomy Gastroenterology 108 990–998

    Google Scholar 

  6. WM Sun MW Read TC Donnelly (1990) ArticleTitleAnorectal function in incontinent patients with cerebrospinal disease Gastroenterology 99 1372–1379

    Google Scholar 

  7. ME Glick H Meshkinpour S Haldeman F Hoeler N Downey WE Bradley (1984) ArticleTitleColonic dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury Gastroenterology 86 287–294

    Google Scholar 

  8. H Meshkinpour F Nowroozi ME Glick (1983) ArticleTitleColonic compliance in patients with spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64 111–112

    Google Scholar 

  9. U Agnarsson C Warde G McCarthy GS Clayden N Evans (1993) ArticleTitleAnorectal function in children with neurological problems, I Dev Med Child Neurol 35 893–902

    Google Scholar 

  10. D Denny-Brown E Graeme Robertson (1935) ArticleTitleAn investigation of the nervous control of defaecation Brain 58 256–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. RD Madoff WJ Orrom DA Rothenberger SM Goldberg (1990) ArticleTitleRectal compliance Int J Colorectal Dis 5 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. NI Alstrup B Skjoldbye OOslash Rasmussen NE Christensen J Christiansen (1995) ArticleTitleRectal compliance determined by rectal endosonography Dis Colon Rectum 38 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  13. GN Rao PJ Drew JR Monson GS Duthie (1997) ArticleTitleIncremental elastic modulus Int J Colorectal Dis 12 33–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. FH Dall CS Jørgensen D Houe H Gregersen JC Djurhuus (1993) ArticleTitleBiomechanical wall properties of the human rectum Gut 34 1581–1586

    Google Scholar 

  15. F Biering-Sørensen V Pedersen S Clausen (1990) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of spinal cord lesions in Denmark Paraplegia 28 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  16. P Meunier P Mollard (1977) ArticleTitleControl of the internal anal sphincter (manometric study with human subjects) Pflugers Arch 370 233–239

    Google Scholar 

  17. B Freckner (1975) ArticleTitleFunction of the anal sphincters in spinal man Gut 16 638–644

    Google Scholar 

  18. G Devrode P Arhan C Duguay L Tetreault H Akoury B Perey (1979) ArticleTitleTraumatic constipation Gastroenterology 77 1258–1267

    Google Scholar 

  19. FM Maynard MB Bracken G Creasey et al. (1997) ArticleTitleInternational standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 35 266–274

    Google Scholar 

  20. K Krogh AM Ryhammer L Lundby H Gregersen S Laurberg (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance Dis Colon Rectum 44 199–206

    Google Scholar 

  21. HL Duthie NG Kee Kwong B Brown (1970) ArticleTitleAdaptability of the anal canal to distension [abstract] Br J Surg 57 388–206

    Google Scholar 

  22. G Menardo G Bausano E Corazziari et al. (1987) ArticleTitleLarge-bowel transit in paraplegic patients Dis Colon Rectum 30 924–928

    Google Scholar 

  23. F Beuret-Blanquart J Weber JP Gouverneur S Demangeon P Denis (1990) ArticleTitleColonic transit time and anorectal manometric anomalies in 19 patients with complete transection of the spinal cord J Auton Nerv Syst 25 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  24. A Keshavarzian WE Barnes K Bruninga B Nemchausky H Mermall D Bushnell (1995) ArticleTitleDelayed colonic transit in spinal cord-injured patients measured by indium-111 amberlite scintigraphy Am J Gastroenterol 90 1295–1300

    Google Scholar 

  25. M Camilleri MJ Ford (1998) ArticleTitleReview article Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12 287–302

    Google Scholar 

  26. E Koldewijn PE Van Kerrebroeck PF Rosier H Wijkstra FM Debruyne (1994) ArticleTitleBladder compliance after posterior sacral root rhizotomies and anterior sacral root stimulation J Urol 151 955–960

    Google Scholar 

  27. WG Kuhn (1947) ArticleTitleThe care and rehabilitation of patients with injuries of the spinal cord and cauda equina Neurosurg 4 40–68

    Google Scholar 

  28. AF Scharli WB Kiesewetter (1970) ArticleTitleDefecation and continence Dis Colon Rectum 13 81–107

    Google Scholar 

  29. S Åkervall S Fasth S Nordgren T Oresland L Hulten (1989) ArticleTitleRectal reservoir and sensory function studied by graded isobaric distension in normal man Gut 30 496–502

    Google Scholar 

  30. R MacDonagh WM Sun DG Thomas R Smallwood NW Read (1992) ArticleTitleAnorectal function in patients with complete supraconal spinal cord lesions Gut 33 1532–1538

    Google Scholar 

  31. AM Connell H Frankel L Guttmann (1963) ArticleTitleThe motility of the pelvic colon following complete lesions of the spinal cord Paraplegia 1 98–115

    Google Scholar 

  32. M Bouvier JC Grimaud B Naudy J Salducci (1987) ArticleTitleEffects of morphine on electrical activity of the rectum in man J Physiol 388 153–161

    Google Scholar 

  33. AM Connell (1961) ArticleTitleThe motility of the pelvic colon, I Gut 2 175–186

    Google Scholar 

  34. D Kumar NS Williams D Waldron DL Wingate (1989) ArticleTitleProlonged manometric recording of anorectal motor activity in ambulant human subjects Gut 30 1007–1011

    Google Scholar 

  35. D Kumar PD Thompson DL Wingate (1990) ArticleTitleAbsence of synchrony between human small intestinal migrating motor complex and rectal motor complex Am J Physiol 258 171–172

    Google Scholar 

  36. A Prior UJ Fearn NW Read (1991) ArticleTitleIntermittent rectal motor activity Gut 32 1360–1363

    Google Scholar 

  37. F Herbst MA Kamm GP Morris K Britton J Woloszko RJ Nicholls (1997) ArticleTitleGastrointestinal transit and prolonged ambulatory colonic motility in health and faecal incontinence Gut 41 381–389

    Google Scholar 

  38. EM Uher M Swash (1998) ArticleTitleSacral reflexes Dis Colon Rectum 41 1165–1177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Krogh, K., Mosdal, C., Gregersen, H. et al. Rectal Wall Properties in Patients With Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord Lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 45, 641–649 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6261-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6261-6

Keywords

Navigation