Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of antecedent groundwater conditions on the triggering of static liquefaction landslides

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real-time early warning systems for shallow landslides are typically built upon real-time measurements and forecasts of rainfall and empirical correlations between past patterns of rainfall and landslide occurrence. Whereas these relationships describe whether certain combinations of rainfall and preexisting groundwater levels are of elevated risk of landslide triggering, not all combinations leading to landslide events necessarily have the same consequences in terms of landslide mobility (velocity and distal reach of the landslide). In this paper, the technique of geotechnical centrifuge modeling is used to quantitatively evaluate the hypothesis that the mobility of a landslide triggered under elevated antecedent groundwater conditions is higher than scenarios under drier antecedent conditions. Five identical slope models with a shallow depth to bedrock were subjected to different antecedent conditions ranging from zero groundwater flux to nearly saturated conditions prior to rainfall. The results from these scenarios show that higher antecedent groundwater conditions can result in landslides with velocities about three times higher and travel distances about eight times higher than low antecedent conditions due to static liquefaction of the soil at the base of the slope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleotti P (2004) A warning system for rainfall induced shallow failures. Eng Geol 73:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askarinejad A, Laue J, Zweidler A, Iten M, Bleiker E, Buschor H, Springman SM (2012) Physical modelling of rainfall induced landslides under controlled climatic conditions. EuroFuge 2012, 23–24 April, Delft, Netherlands. 1–10

  • Baki MAL, Rahman MM, Lo SR, Gnanendran CT (2012) Linkage between static and cyclic liquefaction of loose sand with a range of fines contents. Can Geotech J 49:891–906. doi:10.1139/T2012-045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geogr Ann 62(1–2):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu J, Leroueil S, Leong WK (2003) Unstable behaviour of sand and its implication for slope instability. Can Geotech J 40:873–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoodi R (2008) Physical modeling of flowslide mobility. MSc Thesis. Queen’s University, Kingston, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoodi R, Take WA, Phillips R (2010) Development of a landslide testing flume for use within a geotechnical centrifuge. Geo2010 Conference, Calgary, AB, September 2010

  • Dutton MG, Take WA, Hoult NA (2011) Effect of imaging distance on image texture of sand in PIV analysis. Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference Proceedings

  • Eckersley D (1990) Instrumented laboratory flowslides. Geotechnique 40(3):489–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier J, Gaudin C, Springman SM, Culligan PJ, Goodings D, Konig D, Kutter B, Phillips R, Randolph MF, Thorel L (2007) Catalog of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modeling. Int J Phys Model Geotech 3:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiassian H, Ghareh S (2008) Stability of sandy slopes under seepage conditions. Landslides 5:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannecchini R, Galanti Y, D’Amato AG (2012) Critical rainfall thresholds for triggering shallow landslides in the Serchio river valley (Tuscany, Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Peruccacci S, Rossi M, Stark CP (2008) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides 5:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Weatherly H (2003) A hydroclimatic threshold for landslide initiation on the Northern Shore Mountains of Vancouver, British Columbia. Geomorphology 54:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lade PV (1992) Static instability and liquefaction of loose fine sandy slopes. J Geotech Eng 118(1):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanni C (2012) Hydrological controls on the triggering of shallow landslides: from local to landscape scale. PhD Thesis. University of Trento, Trento Italy

  • Lee YS, Cheuk CY, Bolton MD (2008) Instability caused by a seepage impediment in layered fill slopes. Can Geotech J 45:1410–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsushi Y, Matsukura Y (2007) Rainfall thresholds for shallow landsliding derived from pressure-head monitoring: cases with permeable and impermeable bedrocks in Boso Peninsula, Japan. Eart Surf Process Landforms 32:1308–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30(4):1153–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW (2007) Keynote paper: Liquefied flow and non-liquefied slide of loose fill slopes. Proc. 13th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10-14 December, Kolkata. Vol. 2 (post-conference volume). Allied Publishers Private Ltd, India, pp 120–134

  • Ng CWW, Shi Q (1998) A numerical investigation of the stability of unsaturated soil slopes subjected to transient seepage. Compt Rendus Geosci 22(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivares L, Damiano E, Greco R, Zeni L, Picarelli L, Minardo A, Guida A, Bernini R (2009) An instrumented flume to investigate the mechanics of rainfall-induced landslides in unsaturated granular soils. Geotech, Testing J, 32(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK et al (2000) The CANLEX project: summary and conclusions. Can Geotech J 37:563–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamarina JC, Cho GC (2001) Determination of critical state parameters in sandy soils—simple procedure. Geotech Test J 24(2):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens GA, Peters SB, Take WA (2013) Comparison of confined and unconfined infiltration in transparent porous media. Water Res 49(2):851–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Take WA (2014) Keynote paper, 8th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. Australia, Perth, Physical modelling of instability and flow in loose granular slopes

    Google Scholar 

  • Take WA, Beddoe RA (2014) Base liquefaction: a mechanism for shear-induced failure of loose granular slopes. Can Geotech J 51(5):496–507. doi:10.1139/cgj-2012-0457

  • Take WA, Bolton MD, Wong PCP, Yeung FJ (2004) Evaluation of landslide triggering mechanisms in model fill slopes. Landslides 1:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamate S, Suemasa N, Katada T (2012) Simulation of precipitation on centrifuge models of slopes. Int J Phys Model Geotech 12(3):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RN (1995) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow

  • Terlien MTJ (1998) The determination of statistical and deterministic hydrological landslide-triggering thresholds. Environ Geol 35(2–3):124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DJ, Take WA, Bolton MD (2003) Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Geotechnique 53(7):619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolinsky E, Take A (2010) Measurement of landslide acceleration using PIV image analysis. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (ICPMG 2010): 405–410

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under the Discovery, Discovery Accelerator Supplement, Research Tools and Instruments, and Major Resources Support grant programs. Additional funding for equipment and sensors was provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation. The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of former research student Jeff Kemp in conducting the centrifuge testing program, and the support and assistance of the C-CORE centrifuge team (Gerry Piercey, Don Cameron, and Derry Nicholl) in performing the physical modeling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Andy Take.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Take, W.A., Beddoe, R.A., Davoodi-Bilesavar, R. et al. Effect of antecedent groundwater conditions on the triggering of static liquefaction landslides. Landslides 12, 469–479 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0496-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0496-7

Keywords

Navigation