Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of scat counts and camera-trapping as means of assessing Iberian lynx abundance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rigorous cost-effective census methods are an essential part of managing wild animal populations, particularly if the involved species require continuous monitoring. In recent years, the range and size of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population have increased notably as a result of conservation programs. Given this expansive scenario, monitoring Iberian lynx using camera-traps may become logistically and financially unfeasible. Here, we test whether or not scat counts are as efficient as camera-trapping in predicting lynx densities and compare the cost of these two approaches to lynx monitoring. We found a significant positive linear relationship between these two methods of assessing Iberian lynx abundance. Lynx abundance assessment by scat counting was six times less expensive than camera-trapping; there was no significant effect of the two study areas on the observed patterns (GLM F1,7 = 45.81, P < 0.001). Our study shows that scat counting is a non-invasive cost-effective method that can provide reliable assessments of Iberian lynx abundance. However, if comparisons are to be made, censuses should be carried out (a) under as nearly identical conditions as possible and (b) in the same season. A number of different factors affect scat abundance, and in order to improve counts, it would be of great interest to evaluate the potential effect of the factors that cause scat estimates to vary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo P, Ferreres J, Jaroso R, Durán M, Escudero MA, Marco J, Gortázar C (2010) Estimating roe deer abundance from pellet group counts in Spain: an assessment of methods suitable for Mediterranean woodlands. Ecol Indic 10(6):1226–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alda F, Inogés J, Alcaraz L, Oria J, Aranda A, Doadrio I (2008) Looking for the Iberian lynx in central Spain: a needle in a haystack? Anim Conserv 1–9

  • Andelt W, Andelt S (1984) Diet bias in scat deposition-rate surveys of coyote density. Wildl Soc Bull 12(1):74–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme GA, Hunter LTB, Slotow R (2009) Evaluating methods for counting cryptic carnivores. J Wildl Manag 73:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barne RFW (2001) How reliable are dung counts for estimating elephant numbers? Afr J Ecol 39(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks J, Messenger J, Braithwaite, Davison A, Brookes R, Strachan C (2005) Are Scat Surveys a Reliable Method for Assessing Distribution and Population Status of Pine Martens?. In Martens and Fishers (Martes) in Human-Altered Environments. An International Perspective Harrison, Daniel J., Fuller, Angela K., Proulx, Gilbert (Eds.) 235–252. Springer USDA

  • Cavallini P, Santini S (1996) Reproduction of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in Central Italy. Ann Zool Fenn 33:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossios ED, Madrid A, Consori JL, Fajardo U (2007) Update on the distribution of the Andean cat Oreailurus jacobita and the pampas cat Lynchailurus colocolo in Peru. Endanger Species Res 3:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell LE, Roman J, Sunquist ME (2000) Dietary separation of sympatric carnivores identified by molecular analysis of scats. Mol Ecol 9:1583–1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez N, Delibes M, Palomares F (2006) Landscape evaluation in conservation: Molecular sampling and habitat modeling for the Iberian lynx. Ecol Appl 16(3):1037–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrote G, Perez de Ayala R, Pereira P, Robles F, Guzman N, García F, Iglesias MC, Hervás J, Fajardo I, Simón M, Barroso JL (2011) Estimation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population in the Doñana area, SW Spain, using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Eur J Wildl Res 57:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi P, Sinibaldi I, Boitani L (1996) Spacing patterns and territoriality of the stone marten. Can J Zool 75:1966–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Sánchez JM, Ballesteros-Duperón E, Bueno-Segura JF (2006) Feeding ecology of the Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus in eastern Sierra Morena (Southern Spain). Acta Theriol 51(1):85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán N, García FJ, Garrote G, Pérez de Ayala R, Iglesias C (2004) El lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) en España y Portugal. Censo diagnóstico de sus poblaciones. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LA, Andrew L, Harrington D, Macdonald DW (2008) Estimating the relative abundance of American mink Mustela vison on lowland rivers: Evaluation and comparison of two techniques. Eur J Wildl Res 54:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU (1995) Estimating tiger populations from camera-trap data using capture–recapture models. Biol Conserv 71:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucherini M, Reppucci J, Luengos Vidal E (2009) A comparison of three methods to estimate variations in the relative abundance of mountain vizcachas (Lagidium viscania) in the high Andes ecosystems. J Neotrop Mammal 16:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondol S, Karanth UK, Kumar AN, Gpalaswany AM, Andheria A, Ramakrishnan U (2009) Evaluation of non-invasive genetic sampling methods for stimating tiger population size. Biol Conserv 142(10):2350–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris D, Michalski F (2010) Implications of faecal removal by dung beetles for scat surveys in a fragmented landscape of the Brazilian Amazon. Oryx 44(3):455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell C, Jackson P (1996) Wildcats, Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Godoy JA, Piriz A, O’Brien SJ, Johnson WE (2002) Faecal genetic analysis to determine the presence and distribution of elusive carnivores: Design and feasibility for the Iberian lynx. Molec Ecol 11:2171–2182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Delibes M, Revilla E, Calzada J, Fedriani JM (2001) Spatial ecology of iberian lynx and abundance of European Rabbits in Southwestern Spain. Wildl Monogr 148:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry GS, Forman D, Hill C (2006) Monitoring the mustelids: factors affecting the degradation of Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra L.) spraints. Poster presentation. British Ecological Society Annual Meeting, Oxford

  • Perez I, Geffen E, Mokady O (2006) Critically endangered Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr in Israel: Estimating population parameters using molecular scatology. Oryx 40:295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts NJ (2011) Investigation into survey techniques of large mammals: Surveyor competence and camera-trapping vs. transect-sampling. Biosci Horiz 4:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruell EW, Riley SPD, Douglas MR, Pollinger JP, Crooks KR (2009) Estimating bobcat population sizes and densities in a fragmented urban landscape using noninvasive capture-recapture sampling. J Mammal 90(1):129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmento P, Cruz J, Monterroso P, Tarroso P, Ferreira C, Negroes N, Eira C (2009) Status survey of the critically endangered Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus in Portugal. Eur J Wildl Res 55:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart JCR, Ward AI, White PCL (2004) Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: an imprecise science. Mammal Rev 34:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GA (1982) The estimation of animal abundance. Charles Griffin & Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver SC, Ostro LET, Marsh LK, Maffei L, Noss AJ, Kelly MJ, Wallace RB, Gómez H, Ayala G (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira L, Ata J, Diniz-filho JAF (2003) Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biol Conserv 114:351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simón MA, Gil-Sánchez JM, Ruiz G, Garrote G, McCain E, Fernandez L, López-Parra M, Rojas E, Arenas-Rojas R, del Rey T, García-Tardío M, López G (2012) Reverse of the decline of the endangered Iberian lynx. Conserv Biol 26:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trolle M, Kéry M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mammal 84:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by DGCONA-MIMAM project “Censo- Diagnóstico de las Poblaciones de Lince Ibérico en España”. We wish to express our gratitude to Nicolas Guzmán, Paco García, Concha Iglesias, Pablo Pereira, and Paco Robles that carried out with us the fieldwork. We also thank Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales (Doñana and Lugar nuevo), Parque Natural de Doñana, Parque Natural de la Sierra de Andújar, TRAGSA, Fundación CBD-Hábitat, WWF/España, EGMASA, CMA Junta de Andalucía. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germán Garrote.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garrote, G., de Ayala, R.P. & Tellería, J.L. A comparison of scat counts and camera-trapping as means of assessing Iberian lynx abundance. Eur J Wildl Res 60, 885–889 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0855-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0855-7

Keywords

Navigation