Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of attractant lures in camera trapping: a case study of population estimates for the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus)

European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capture–recapture analysis of camera trap data is a conventional method to estimate the abundance of free-ranging wild felids. Due to notorious low detection rates of felids, it is important to increase the detection probability during sampling. In this study, we report the effectiveness of attractants as a tool for improving the efficiency of camera trap sampling in abundance estimation of Iberian lynx. We developed a grid system of camera stations in which stations with and without attractant lures were spatially alternated across known Iberian lynx habitat. Of the ten individuals identified, five were detected at stations with no attractant (blind sets), and nine, at the lured stations. Thirty-eight percent of blind set station’s independent captures and 10 % of lured station’s independent captures resulted in photographs unsuitable for correct individual identification. The total capture probability at lured stations was higher than that obtained at blind set stations. The estimates obtained with blind set cameras underestimated the number of lynxes compared to lured cameras. In our study, it appears that the use of lures increased the efficiency of trail camera captures and, therefore, the accuracy of capture–recapture analysis. The observed failure to detect known individuals at blind set camera stations may violate capture–recapture assumptions and bias abundance estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Chamberlain MJ, Mangrum JW, Leopold BD, Hill EP (1999) A comparison of attractants used for carnivore track surveys. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 53:296–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon A, Kelly MJ (2007) Ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates. Oryx 41:469–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrote G, Perez de Ayala R, Pereira P, Robles F, Guzman N, García F, Iglesias MC, Hervás J, Fajardo I, Simón M, Barroso JL (2011) Estimation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population in the Doñana area, SW Spain, using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. Eur J Wildl Res 57:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Sánchez JM, Moral M, Bueno J, Rodríguez-Siles J, Lillo S, Pérez J, Martín JM, Valenzuela G, Garrote G, Torralba B, Simón-Mata MA (2011) The use of camera trapping for estimating Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) home ranges. Eur J Wildl Res. doi:10.1007/s10344-011-0533-y

  • Guil F, Agudín S, El-Khadir N, Fernandez-Olalla M, Figueredo J, Domínguez FG, Garzon P, Gonzalez G, Muñoz-Igualada J, Oria J (2010) Factors conditioning the camera-trapping efficiency for the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Eur J Wildl Res 56:633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán N, García FJ, Garrote G, Pérez de Ayala R, Iglesias C (2004) El lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) en España y Portugal. Censo-diagnóstico de sus poblaciones. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Doncaster CP (2010) Heterogeneous capture rates in low density populations and consequences for capture-recapture analysis of camera-trap data. Popul Ecol 53:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henschel P, Ray J (2003) Leopards in African rainforests: survey and monitoring techniques. WCS Global Carnivore Program. Wildlife Conservation Society

  • Howard ME, Zuercher GL, Gipson PS, Livingston TR (2002) Efficacy of feces as an attractant for mammalian carnivores. Southwest Nat 47(3):348–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RM, Roe JD, Wangchuk R, Hunter DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture-recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bul 34:772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KU, Nichols JD (eds) (2002) Monitoring tigers and their prey: A manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrucea ES, Serra G, Jaeger MM, Barrett RH (2007) Censusing bobcats using remote cameras. Western North Am Nat 67(4):538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei L, Noss AJ, Silver SC, Kelly M (2011) Abundance/density case study: Jaguars in the Americas. In: O’connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU (eds) Camera traps in animal ecology: Methods and analyses. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain EB, Childs JL (2008) Evidence of resident jaguars (Panthera onca) in the southwestern United States and the implications for conservation. J Mammal 89(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham G, White C, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexstad E, Burnham KP (1991) User’s guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira L, Anah TA, Jacomo ATA, Astete S, Sollmann R, Torres NM, Furtado MM, Marinho-Filho J (2009) Density of the near threatened jaguar Panthera onca in the Caatinga of north-eastern Brazil. Oryx 44(1):104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver SC, Ostro LET, Marsh LK, Maffei L, Noss AJ, Kelly MJ, Wallace RB, RB G, Guido Ayala H (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38(No 2)

  • Simón MA, Gil-Sánchez JM, Ruiz M, Garrote G, McCain E, Fernández L, López-Parra M, Rojas E, Arenas-Rojas R, del Rey T, García-Tardío M, López G (2012) Reverse of the decline of the endangered Iberian lynx. Conserv Biol. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01871.x

  • Trolle M, Kéry M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the Pantanal using capture-recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mammal 84:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Pokheral CP, Jnawali SR (2004) Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies. Anim Conserv 7:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture–recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the LIFE Project NAT/E/209 “Conservation and reintroduction of the Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus) in Andalusia.” We also wish to express our gratitude to the director of the Natural Park of Sierra de Andújar, Jose M. Molina. The study was conducted with all the necessary permits provided by the government of Andalucía. Three anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germán Garrote.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortazar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrote, G., Gil-Sánchez, J.M., McCain, E.B. et al. The effect of attractant lures in camera trapping: a case study of population estimates for the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Eur J Wildl Res 58, 881–884 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0658-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0658-7

Keywords

Navigation