Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproductive potential of domestic Ovis aries for preservation of threatened Ovis orientalis isphahanica: in vitro and in vivo studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the potential use of reproductive biotechnology for safeguarding of endangered wildlife species is undoubted, initial evaluation of the genetic and reproductive relationship between the endangered mammals and those closely related species is indispensable. Isfahan mouflon Ovis orientalis isphahanica is now considered as a threatened species by International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Therefore, little is known about the biology of this species. This study was carried out to investigate the possible reproductive potential of domestic sheep for ex situ conservation of the Isfahan mouflon. Somatic cell cultures were taken from ear biopsies of the wild and domestic sheep and were used for karyotype analysis. Semen samples were collected by electroejaculator from the wild and domestic rams. The spermatological characteristics of the collected semen samples were determined and used for both cryopreservation and cross-insemination of the synchronized wild and domestic female sheep. To establish a cryobank for the threatened species biomaterials, freezed samples of the somatic cells and semen were transferred to a cryotank. The result suggested that Isfahan mouflon has conserved its chromosomal integrity as previously observed and contains the same chromosomal number as the domestic sheep (2n = 54). The semen samples of both species revealed similar cryoviability (>35% gross motility postthawing). Cross-insemination of both species resulted in successful pregnancy. It was suggested that domestic sheep possesses the required biological characteristics to be considered for safeguarding of the Isfahan mouflon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amstislavsky SYa (2006) Interspecies transplantation of embryos and nuclear transfer as an approach to conservation of disappearing mammalian species. Ontogenez 37(1):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrabi SM, Maxwell WM (2007) A review on reproductive biotechnologies for conservation of endangered mammalian species. Anim Reprod Sci 99(3–4):223–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari HA, Bosma AA, Broad TE, Bunch TD, Long SE, Maher DW, Pearce PD, Popescu CP (1999) Standard G-, Q-, and R-banded ideograms of the domestic sheep (Ovis aries): homology with cattle (Bos taurus). Report of the committee for the standardization of the sheep karyotype. Cytogenet Cell Genet 85(3–4):317–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bamba K (1988) Evaluation of acrosomal integrity of boar spermatozoa by bright-field microscopy using an eosin–nigrosin stain. Theriogenology 29:1245–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlinguer F, Leoni GG, Bogliolo L, Bebbere D, Succu S, Rosati I, Ledda S, Naitana S (2005) In vivo and in vitro fertilizing capacity of cryopreserved European mouflon [Ovis gmelini musimon] spermatozoa used to restore genetically rare and isolated populations. Theriogenology 63(3):902–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch TD, Foote WC (1976) Chromosomes, hemoglobins, and transferrins of Iranian domestic sheep. J Hered 67(3):167–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1996) Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380(6569):64–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comizzoli P, Mermillod P, Mauget R (2000) Reproductive biotechnologies for endangered mammalian species. Reprod Nutr Dev 40(5):493–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cseh S, Solti L (2000) Importance of assisted reproductive technologies in the conservation of wild, rare or indigenous ungulates: review article. Acta Vet Hung 48(3):313–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deligiannis C, Valasi I, Rekkas CA, Goulas P, Theodosiadou E, Lainas T, Amiridis GS (2005) Synchronization of ovulation and fixed time intrauterine insemination in ewes. Reprod Domest Anim 40(1):6–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fickel J, Wagener A, Ludwig A (2007) Semen cryopreservation and the conservation of endangered species. Eur J Wildl Res 53:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freshney RI (1994) Culture of anima cells, a manual of basic technique, 3rd edn. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt TB, Göritz F, Hermes R (2006) Ultrasonography: an important tool in captive breeding management. Eur J Wildl Res 52:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt WV, Pickard AR (1999) Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Rev Reprod 4:143–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2000) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, confirming the global extinction crisis. International Union for the Conservation of Nature. http://www.iucn.org/redlist/2000/news.html

  • Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Diaz F, Moraes CT, Farin PW, Farin CE, Hammer CJ, West MD, Damiani P (2000) Cloning of an endangered species (Bos gaurus) using interspecies nuclear transfer. Cloning 2(2):79–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibo SP, Songsasen N (2002) Cryopreservation of gametes and embryos of non-domestic species. Theriogenology 57(1):303–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loi P, Ptak G, Barboni B, Fulka J Jr, Cappai P, Clinton M (2001) Genetic rescue of an endangered mammal by cross-species nuclear transfer using post-mortem somatic cells. Nat Biotechnol 19(10):962–964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig A (2006) A sturgeon view on conservation genetics. Eur J Wildl Res 52:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler CF, Lay DM, Hassinger JD (1971) Cytogenetic analyses of wild sheep populations in northern Iran. Cytogenetics 10:137–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler CF, Deutsch L, Lay DM (1976) Isoenzyme comparisons of wild Iranian sheep (Ovis linnaeus). Comp Biochem Physiol 53:123–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nel-Themaat L, Harding GD, Chandler JE, Chenevert JF, Damiani P, Fernandez JM, Humes PE, Pope CE, Godke RA (2006) Quality and freezing qualities of first and second ejaculates collected from endangered Gulf Coast Native rams. Anim Reprod Sci 95(3–4):251–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JJ, Susko-Parish JL, Winer MA, First NL (1988) Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 38:1171–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ptak G, Clinton M, Barboni B, Muzzeddu M, Cappai P, Tischner M, Loi P (2002) Preservation of the wild European mouflon: the first example of genetic management using a complete program of reproductive biotechnologies. Biol Reprod 66(3):796–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pukazhenthi BS, Wildt DE (2004) Which reproductive technologies are most relevant to studying, managing and conserving wildlife? Reprod Fertil Dev 16(2):33–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon S, Maxwell WMC (1995) Frozen storage of ram semen, processing, freezing, thawing and fertility after cervical insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 37:185–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon S, Maxwell WMC (2000) Storage of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62:77–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seehausen O, Takimoto G, Roy D, Jokela J (2008) Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Molecular Ecology 17:30–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton DM (1997) Wild sheep and goats and their relatives. IUCN Caprinae Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 390 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanghe S, Van Soom A, Sterckx V, Maes D, de Kruif A (2002) Assessment of different sperm quality parameters to predict in vitro fertility of bulls. Reprod Domest Anim 37(3):127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tartagni M, Schonauer MM, Cicinelli E, Selman H, De Ziegler D, Petruzzelli F, D'Addario V (2002) Usefulness of the hypo-osmotic swelling test in predicting pregnancy rate and outcome in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Androl 23(4):498–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornback J, Jenkins M (1982) The IUCN mammal red data book. Part II. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez R, Nadler CF, Bunch TD (1978) Evolution of wild sheep in Iran. Evolution 32:56–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildt DE, Monfort SL, Donoghue AM, Johnston LA, Howard J (1992) Embryogenesis in conservation biology—or, how to make an endangered species embryo. Theriogenology 37:161–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildt DE, Rall WF, Critser JK, Monfort SL, Seal US (1997) Genome resource banks. BioScience 47:689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziaie H (1997) Chapter 5.1 (Iran). In: Shackleton DM (ed) Wild sheep and goats and their relatives: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Caprinae Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by a grant from the Royan Institute of IRI. We would like to gratefully thank Dr. H Gurabi and Dr. A. Vosough for their full supports. We would also like to thanks A. Ghaderi for his kind assistance in keeping the wild sheep.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. H. Nasr-Esfahani.

Additional information

Communicated by W. Lutz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.M., Fazilati, M., Moulavi, F. et al. Reproductive potential of domestic Ovis aries for preservation of threatened Ovis orientalis isphahanica: in vitro and in vivo studies. Eur J Wildl Res 55, 239–246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0242-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0242-3

Keywords

Navigation