Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Tree growth-competition relationships in thinned Eucalyptus plantations vary with stand structure and site quality

  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth responses to thinning can vary with site quality and age, however, the direction of the response varies. An understanding of the mechanisms behind thinning responses could help forest managers optimise production as well as inform modellers and ecologists about the functioning of tree stands. Thinning was used to create a range of stand densities in eleven Eucalyptus plantation stands on seven sites in south-eastern Australia. Basal area periodic annual increment (PAI; cm2 year−1) of individual dominant and codominant trees was then related to competition, such that PAI = a + b ln(Competition). Competition was defined as the sum of the basal area of neighbouring trees within a radius of 6.5 m. The relative (%) and absolute (cm2 year−1) responses to competition were quantified using b, which was correlated with site quality and stand structure of unthinned stands. Stand structure was quantified using statistics or parameters that describe the diameter distribution for the given age, species and site, including skewness, the coefficient of variation and parameters of the Weibull probability distribution. Relative and absolute responses both increased with increasing site quality and in stands with more negatively skewed diameter distributions (higher proportion of larger trees) or lower coefficients of variation. Absolute thinning responses often increased with increasing size class, while relative thinning responses often decreased. Variables describing diameter distributions (size-class structure) were able to describe some of the variation in competition responses that site quality could not. This indicates why stands on similar site qualities but with different stand structures can have correspondingly different thinning responses. Stand structural variables may be more useful predictors of thinning responses in stands that experience large temporal changes in diameter distributions compared with site quality, which is a more static variable. Thus, knowledge about the development of diameter distributions might help to refine thinning regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez González JG, Schröder J, Rodríguez Soalleiro R, Ruíz González AD (2002) Modelling the effect of thinnings on the diameter distribution of even-aged Maritime Pine stands. For Ecol Manag 165:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1992) A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. For Sci 38:695–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins DP, Prescott CE, Allen HL, Newsome TA (2005) The effects of nutrition and density on growth, foliage biomass, and growth efficiency of high-density fire-origin lodgepole pine in central British Columbia. Can J For Res 35:2851–2859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bréda N, Granier A, Aussenac G (1995) Effects of thinning on soil and tree water relations, transpiration and growth in an oak forest (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Tree Physiol 15:295–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brockley RP (2005) Effects of post-thinning density and repeated fertilization on the growth and development of young lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 35:1952–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campoe OC, Stape JL, Nouvellon Y, Laclau JP, Bauerle WL, Binkley D, Maire GL (in press) Stem production, light absorption and light use efficiency between dominant and non-dominant trees of Eucalyptus grandis across a productivity gradient in Brazil. For Ecol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.035

  • Corral Rivas JJ, Álvarez González JG, Aguirre O, Hernández J (2005) The effect of competition on individual tree basal area growth in mature stands of Pinus cooperi Blanco in Durango (Mexico). Eur J For Res 124:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa e Silva J, Hardner C, Tilyard P, Pires AM, Potts BM (2010) Effects of inbreeding on population mean performance and observational variances in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci 67:605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Baker TG (2012) Growth responses to thinning and pruning in Eucalyptus globulus, Eucalyptus nitens, and Eucalyptus grandis plantations in southeastern Australia. Can J For Res 42:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Medhurst JL, Wood M, Beadle CL, Valencia JC (2010) Growth and physiological responses to silviculture for producing solid-wood products from Eucalyptus plantations: an Australian perspective. For Ecol Manag 259:1819–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Vanclay JK, Forrester RI (2011) The balance between facilitation and competition in mixtures of Eucalyptus and Acacia changes as stands develop. Oecologia 166:265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Collopy JJ, Beadle CL, Baker TG (2012a) Interactive effects of simultaneously applied thinning, pruning and fertiliser application treatments on growth, biomass production and crown architecture in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For Ecol Manag 267:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Collopy JJ, Beadle CL, Warren CR, Baker TG (2012b) Effect of thinning, pruning and nitrogen fertiliser application on transpiration, photosynthesis and water-use efficiency in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For Ecol Manag 266:286–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester DI, Collopy JJ, Beadle CL, Baker TG (in press) Effect of thinning, pruning and nitrogen fertiliser application on light interception and light-use efficiency in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation. For Ecol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.024

  • Grosser C, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE (2010) Microsatellite based paternity analysis in a clonal Eucalyptus nitens seed orchard. Silvae Genet 59:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara T (1993) Mode of competition and size-structure dynamics in plant communities. Plant Species Biol 8:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington CA, Wierman CA (1990) Growth and foliar nutrient response to fertilization and precommercial thinning in a coastal western red cedar stand. Can J For Res 20:764–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell R (2002) The Australian Soil Classification, Revised Edition. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

  • Kellomäki S, Väisänen H (1997) Modelling the dynamics of the forest ecosystem for climate change studies in the boreal conditions. Ecol Model 97:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikuzawa K, Umeki K (1996) Effect of canopy structure on degree of asymmetry of competition in two forest stands in northern Japan. Ann Bot 77:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb TE, Agee JK, Fule PZ, McDowell NG, Pearson K, Sala A, Waring RH (2007) Perpetuating old ponderosa pine. For Ecol Manag 249:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Sala AV (2006) Pre-commercial thinning and fertiliser enhance growth in young native Eucalyptus obliqua (L’Hérit.) stands in Tasmania. Aust For 69:16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch P, Badeck F-W, Suckow F, Lindner M, Mohr P (2005) Model-based analysis of management alternatives at stand and regional level in Brandenburg (Germany). For Ecol Manag 207:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen H, Isomäki A (2004a) Thinning intensity and growth of Scots pine stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag 201:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkinen H, Isomäki A (2004b) Thinning intensity and long-term changes in increment and stem form of Norway spruce trees. For Ecol Manag 201:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medhurst JL, Beadle CL, Neilsen WA (2001) Early-age and later-age thinning affects growth, dominance, and intraspecific competition in Eucalyptus nitens plantations. Can J For Res 31:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina MG (1992) Response of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. to thinning and urea fertilization in New-Zealand. For Ecol Manag 51:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monserud RA, Sterba H (1996) A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For Ecol Manag 80:57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JA, Zhang L, Newberry JD (1994) Effects of intermediate silvicultural treatments on the distribution of within-stand growth. Can J For Res 24:398–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord-Larsen T, Cao QV (2006) A diameter distribution model for even-aged beech in Denmark. For Ecol Manag 231:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omule AY, Mitchell AK, Wagner WL (2011) Fertilization and thinning effects on a Douglas-fir ecosystem at Shawnigan Lake: 32-year growth response Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC. Information Report FI-X-005., p 22

  • Peng C (2000) Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. For Ecol Manag 132:259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 664 p

  • Pukkala T, Miina J, Kellomäki S (1998) Response to different thinning intensities in young Pinus sylvestris. Scand J For Res 13:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruha T, Varmola M (1997) Precommercial thinning in naturally regenerated Scots Pine stands in northern Finland. Silva Fennica 31:401–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J, Gadow KV (1999) Testing a new competition index for Maritime pine in northwestern Spain. Can J For Res 29:280–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J, Soalleiro RR, Alonso GV (2002) An age-independent basal area increment model for maritime pine trees in northwestern Spain. For Ecol Manag 157:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simard SW, Blenner-Hassett T, Cameron IR (2004) Pre-commercial thinning effects on growth, yield and mortality in even-aged paper birch stands in British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 190:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stackpole DJ, Duncan MJ, Smith MJ, Baker TG (2004) Value-added silvicultural regimes for high quality timber production from intensively managed hardwood and softwood plantations, PN97.602 FaWPRaDC (ed) Forest Science Centre, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, pp 55

  • Stoneman GL, Crombie DS, Whitford K, Hingston FJ, Giles R, Portlock CC, Galbraith JH, Dimmock GM (1996) Growth and water relations of Eucalyptus marginata (jarrah) stands in response to thinning and fertilization. Tree Physiol 17:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay JK (2006) Spatially-explicit competition indices and the analysis of mixed-species plantings with the Simile modelling environment. For Ecol Manag 233:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Peng C, Zhang SY, Zhou X, Larocque GR, Kneeshaw DD, Lei X (2011) Development of TRIPLEX-management model for simulating the response of forest growth to pre-commercial thinning. Ecol Model 222:2249–2261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1985) Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology 66:743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomea tricolor populations. Ecology 67:1425–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wykoff WR (1990) A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountains. For Sci 36:1077–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Huang S, Meng SX, Trincado G, VanderSchaaf CL (2009) A multilevel individual tree basal area increment model for aspen in boreal mixedwood stands. Can J For Res 39:2203–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The studies presented and analysed here were supported by the Victorian Department of Primary Industries, and the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), Forest and Wood Products Australia, and the Cooperative Research Centre for Forestry. HVP Plantations, Peart family, Goulburn Valley Region Water Authority and DSE provided sites, silvicultural assistance and some data. Numerous individuals contributed variously to trial design, establishment, maintenance and measurement, including A. Ashton, R. Bickford, R. Borschmann, J. Collopy, J. Costenaro, M. Duncan, P. Kneale, M. Lutze, M. McCormick, B. McGinniskin, D. Oswin, S. Lavell, S. Shaw, D. Stackpole, H. Stewart, R. Stokes and G. Wall. Dr. C. Beadle, Dr. C. Harwood and three anonymous reviewers provided useful comments, improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, The University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia

    David I. Forrester & Thomas G. Baker

  2. Cooperative Research Centre for Forestry, Private Bag 12, Hobart, 7001, Australia

    David I. Forrester, Stephen R. Elms & Thomas G. Baker

  3. Institute of Silviculture, Freiburg University, 79085, Freiburg, Germany

    David I. Forrester

  4. HVP Plantations, 50 Northways Road, Churchill, VIC, 3842, Australia

    Stephen R. Elms

Authors
  1. David I. Forrester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen R. Elms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas G. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. Forrester.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Weiskittel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forrester, D.I., Elms, S.R. & Baker, T.G. Tree growth-competition relationships in thinned Eucalyptus plantations vary with stand structure and site quality. Eur J Forest Res 132, 241–252 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0671-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0671-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation