European Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 407–419

Forest certification and democracy

Authors

    • School of LawThe State University of New York
    • Faculty of Forestry and Environmental ScienceUniversity of Freiburg
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0426-8

Cite this article as:
Meidinger, E. Eur J Forest Res (2011) 130: 407. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0426-8

Abstract

This paper explores the possibility that forest certification represents an important emerging form of transnational democracy. Because it is largely driven and administered by nonstate actors, forest certification can be seen as suffering a democracy deficit. However, because it stresses broad participation, intensive deliberative procedures, responsiveness to state law and widely accepted norms, and competition among regulatory programs to achieve effective implementation and widespread public acceptance, forest certification appears to stand up relatively well under generally understood criteria for democratic governance. Nonetheless, a more satisfactory evaluation will require a better understanding of how responsive certification programs are to diverse, emergent constituencies as well as which certification programs win regulatory competitions, and why.

Keywords

CertificationCorporate social responsibilityDeliberative democracyDemocratic experimentalismDemocracyForest certificationGovernanceInternational tradeNew governanceParticipationRegulationRegulatory competitionSustainable forestryTransnational governance

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010