Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Smells good, feels good: oviposition of Chrysoperla carnea-complex lacewings can be concentrated locally in the field with a combination of appropriate olfactory and tactile stimuli

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Larvae of common green lacewings (Chrysoperla carnea species-complex) are important generalist predators, and can serve as valuable biological control agents. Since only larvae are predatory, oviposition is of crucial importance. Recently, a ternary floral bait was described, attractive to females that would then lay their eggs in the vicinity of the baits. Earlier studies have shown that females prefer to lay their eggs on spines and hairs of plants. In the present study, we tested whether the number of eggs laid could be increased by combining chemical, visual and tactile stimuli. Common green lacewings were caught equally well in baited funnel traps covered with white, yellow, fluorescent yellow, light blue or black sheets, showing no preference to any of the colours. In further tests the field effect of the ternary floral bait on the oviposition site choice of common green lacewings was confirmed, as in the absence of the bait only negligible numbers of eggs were recorded on egg-laying plates. In the presence of the ternary floral bait, lacewings laid more eggs on spiny than on smooth surfaces. Removal of previously laid eggs did not affect the number of eggs laid afterwards. Our studies demonstrated that by combining the ternary floral bait and an appropriate spiny surface, oviposition of common green lacewings can be increased and concentrated to a relatively small area. Possible practical applications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atlihan R, Kaydan B, Özgökce MS (2004) Feeding activity and life history characteristics of the generalist predator, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at different prey densities. J Pest Sci 77:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmer JL, Byers JA, Rodriguez-Saona CR (2008) Evaluation of color traps for monitoring Lygus spp.: design, placement, height, time of day, and non-target effects. Crop Prot 27:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozsik A (1992) Natural adult food of some important Chrysopa species (Planipennia: Chrysopidae). Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 27:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Canard M (2001) Natural food and feeding habits of lacewings. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL (1980) Visual responses of some sugarbeet insects to sticky traps of various yellow and orange hues positioned at two heights. Southwest Entomol 5:76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL, Walmsley MR (1978) Visual responses of some sugarbeet insects to sticky traps and water pan traps of various colors. J Econ Entomol 71:926–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P (2001) Lacewings in field crops. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 158–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flint HM, Salter SS, Walters S (1979) Caryophyllene: an attractant for the green lacewing. Environ Entomol 8:1123–1125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fréchette B, Coderre D, Lucas É (2006) Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) females do not avoid ovipositing in the presence of conspecific eggs. Biol Control 37:354–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagley EAC (1989) Release of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) for control of the green apple aphid, Aphis pomi deGeer (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can Entomol 121:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Thierry D, Duelli P, Johnson JB (2001) The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s. lat.) and the sibling species problem. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaastad G, Hatleli L, Knudsen GK, Tóth M (2010) Volatiles initiate egg laying in common green lacewings. IOBC/wprs Bull 54:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenser G, Szita É, Szénási Á, Vörös G, Tóth M (2010) Monitoring the population of vine thrips (Drepanothrips reuteri Uzel) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) by using fluorescent yellow sticky traps. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 45:329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koczor S, Szentkirályi F, Birkett MA, Pickett JA, Voigt E, Tóth M (2010) Attraction of Chrysoperla carnea complex and Chrysopa spp. lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to aphid sex pheromone components and a synthetic blend of floral compounds in Hungary. Pest Manag Sci 66:1374–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koczor S, Knudsen GK, Hatleli L, Szentkirályi F, Tóth M (2015) Manipulation of oviposition and overwintering site choice of common green lacewings with synthetic lure (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Appl Entomol 139:201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kral K, Stelzl M (1998) Daily visual sensitivity pattern in the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Eur J Entomol 95:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisonneuve JC, Marrec C (1999) The potential of Chrysoperla lucasina for IPM programmes in greenhouses. IOBC/wprs Bull 22:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Maredia KM, Gage SH, Landis DA, Wirth TM (1992) Visual response of Coccinella septempunctata (L.), Hippodamia parenthesis (Say), (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to colors. Biol Control 2:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen PK, Shuja A, Senior L (1998) Conservation of the common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s.l.) (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) to control crop pests. Acta Zool Fenn 209:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrycki JJ, Hamid MN, Sajap AS, Lewis LC (1989) Suitability of corn insect pests for development and survival of Chrysoperla carnea and Chrysopa oculata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 18:1126–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas ML, Broufas GD, Koveos DS (2011) Chrysopid predators and their role in biological control. J Entomol 8:301–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ, Owens ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:337–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ruzicka Z (1996) Oviposition-deterring pheromone in Chrysopidae (Neuroptera): intra- and interspecific effects. Eur J Entomol 93:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattar M, Abro GH (2011) Mass rearing of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults for integrated pest management programmes. Pak J Zool 43:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmera D, Tóth M, Subchev M, Sredkov I, Szarukán I, Jermy T, Szentesi Á (2004) Importance of visual and chemical cues in the development of an attractant trap for Epicometis (Tropinota) hirta Poda (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Crop Prot 23:939–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprent P, Smeeton NC (2007) Applied nonparametric statistical methods. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentkirályi F (2001a) Ecology and habitat relationships. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 82–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Szentkirályi F (2001b) Lacewings in fruit and nut crops. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172–238

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Szentkirályi F (2001c) Lacewings in vegetables, forests, and other crops. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington A (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 239–291

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth M, Bozsik A, Szentkirályi F, Letardi A, Tabilio MR, Verdinelli M, Zandigiacomo P, Jekisa J, Szarukán I (2006) Phenylacetaldehyde: a chemical attractant for common green lacewings (Chrysoperla carnea s.l., Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Eur J Entomol 103:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth M, Szentkirályi F, Vuts J, Letardi A, Tabilio MR, Jaastad G, Knudsen GK (2009) Optimization of a phenylacetaldehyde-based attractant for common green lacewings (Chrysoperla carnea s.l., Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Chem Ecol 35:449–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udayagiri S, Mason CE, Pesek JD (1997) Coleomegilla maculata, Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and Macrocentrus grandii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) trapped on colored sticky traps in corn habitats. Environ Entomol 26:983–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vas J, Ábrahám L, Markó V (1999) Study of nocturnal and diurnal activities of lacewings (Neuropteroidea: Raphidioptera, Neuroptera) by suction trap. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 34:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki FN, El-Shaarawy MF, Farag NA (1999) Release of two predators and two parasitoids to control aphids and whiteflies. J Pest Sci 72:19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Cossé AA, Obrycki JJ, Boo KS, Baker TC (1999) Olfactory reactions of the twelve-spotted lady beetle, Coleomegilla maculata and the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea to semiochemicals released from their prey and host plant: electroantennogram and behavioral responses. J Chem Ecol 25:1163–1177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the National Research Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) grant PD 115938 of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sándor Koczor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animals

All applicable international, national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

Informed consent does not apply to these studies.

Additional information

Communicated by P. G. Becher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koczor, S., Szentkirályi, F., Fekete, Z. et al. Smells good, feels good: oviposition of Chrysoperla carnea-complex lacewings can be concentrated locally in the field with a combination of appropriate olfactory and tactile stimuli. J Pest Sci 90, 311–317 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0785-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0785-0

Keywords

Navigation