Skip to main content
Log in

Liquid Chromatographic Method Development for Forced Degradation Products of Dabigatran Etexilate: Characterisation and In Silico Toxicity Evaluation

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple and accurate UHPLC method was developed for Dabigatran etexilate (DAB) using Acquity CSH C18 (100 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.7 µm) column with mobile phase containing ammonium acetate (pH 5.0) and methanol in gradient program. This method was used to study the forced degradation products of DAB. The drug was found to degrade in all hydrolytic and oxidative conditions resulting in formation of four major degradation products (DP1 to DP4). DAB and its degradation products were well separated using the proposed method. The degradation products were characterized using LC-Q-TOF/ESI/MS/MS and accurate mass measurements for obtaining the structural information. The degradation pathway leading to the formation of the degradation products was also proposed. In silico tools like TOPKAT and DEREK software were used to evaluate the toxicity associated with DAB and its degradation products. The developed method was validated as per ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines. The method showed linear response over a concentration range of 45–105 µg mL−1 with correlation coefficient of 0.9998. The accuracy of the method was observed within the acceptable limits of 98–102 %. The precision of the method was good as indicated by %RSD values less than 1.0. The proposed method was found to be robust when deliberate changes were made in pH of buffer, column temperature and flow rate of the mobile phase. The developed method finds its application as a stability indicating assay method for the determination of DAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Ryn J, Stangier J, Haertter S, Liesenfeld K-H, Wienen W, Feuring M, Clemens A (2010) Thromb Haemost 103:1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holmes M, Carroll C, Papaioannou D (2012) Pharmacoeconomics 30:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Larsen TB, Rasmussen LH, Skjøth F, Due KM, Callréus T, Rosenzweig M, Lip GY (2013) J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2264–2273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW (2011) Circulation 123:1436–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prajapati A, Kumar S, Sen AK, Zanwar A, Seth A (2014) Pharma Sci Monit 5:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernardi RM, Fröehlich PE, Bergold AM (2013) J AOAC Int 96:37–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Damle MC, Bagwe RA (2014) J Adv Sci Res 5:39–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy MBS, Rao NVB (2014) South Pac J Pharm Bio Sci 2:80–92

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Z-Y, Parker RB, Herring VL, Laizure SC (2013) Anal Bioanal Chem 405:1695–1704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Delavenne X, Moracchini J, Laporte S, Mismetti P, Basset T (2012) J Pharm Biomed Anal 58:152–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernardi RM, D’Avila FB, Todeschini V, Andrade JM, Fröehlicha PE, Bergolda AM (2015) J Braz Chem Soc 26:660–666

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ICH guideline (2003) Q1A (R2) stability testing of new drug substances and products. In: International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva

  13. ICH guideline (1996) Q1B photostability testing of new drug substances and products. In: International Conference on Harmonisation, IFPMA, Geneva

  14. Singh S, Handa T, Narayanam M, Sahu A, Junwal M, Shah RP (2012) J Pharm Biomed Anal 69:148–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakshi M, Singh S (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:1011–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Snyder RD, Pearl GS, Mandakas G, Choy WN, Goodsaid F, Rosenblum I (2004) Environ Mol Mutagen 43:143–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dearden JC (2003) J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:119–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Ahmed Kamal, Project Director, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad for his constant encouragement. The authors are thankful to Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, New Delhi, India for providing research fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gananadhamu Samanthula.

Additional information

D. Swain and P. N. Patel contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swain, D., Patel, P.N., Nagaraj, G. et al. Liquid Chromatographic Method Development for Forced Degradation Products of Dabigatran Etexilate: Characterisation and In Silico Toxicity Evaluation. Chromatographia 79, 169–178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-3009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-3009-5

Keywords

Navigation