Skip to main content
Log in

Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Detection for Foodborne Enteroviruses in Vegetable Samples

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foodborne enteroviruses such as norovirus, rotavirus and astrovirus can cause gastroenteritis in children under the age of five and infants. In this paper, a novel and ultrasensitive method, combining reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with capillary electrophoresis laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF), is proposed to detect three viruses in vegetable samples. The viruses, including norovirus, rotavirus and astrovirus in vegetables, were eluted using glycine buffer (pH 9.5), and concentrated by 15 % polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000). The primers, targeting the specific and conservative sequences of nucleic acids of the viruses, were synthesized and used in RT-PCR reaction. The amplification products were labeled with highly sensitive SYBR Gold, then separated by capillary electrophoresis and detected by a laser-induced fluorescence detector within 16 min. The intraday and interday relative standard deviation of migration time for the DNA Marker was in the range of 1.09–1.30 and 1.77–2.60 %, respectively, while the detection limits of the three viruses were as low as 1.33 × 102 copies mL−1 for norovirus, 1.86 × 102 copies mL−1 for rotavirus, and 1.40 × 102 copies mL−1 for astrovirus. Meanwhile, the results of homology analysis and specificity experiments showed that the method had good specificity. A fried pickled mustard tuber tested positive for norovirus by the proposed method in an outbreak which happened recently in Chengdu. This protocol demonstrated the possibility for rapid, sensitive and specific detection of foodborne enteric viruses in vegetable samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jansen A, Stark K, Kunkel J, Schreier E, Ignatius R, Liesenfeld O, Werber D, Göbel UB, Zeitz M, Schneider T (2008) BMC Infect Dis 8:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Naficy AB, Rao MR, Holmes JL, Abu-Elyazeed R, Savarino SJ, Wierzba TF, Frenck RW, Monroe SS, Glass RI, Clemens JD (2000) J Infect Dis 182:685–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennehy PH, Nelson SM, Spangenberger S, Noel JS, Monroe SS, Glass RI (2001) J Infect Dis 184:10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel MM, Widdowson M, Glass RI, Akazawa K, Vinjé J, Parashar UD (2008) Emerg Infect Dis 14:1224–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch A (1998) Int Microbiol 1:191–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koopmans M, Vennema H, Heersma H, van Strien E, van Duynhoven Y, Brown D, Reacher M, Lopman B (2003) Emerg Infect Dis 9:1136–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marks PJ, Vipond IB, Regan FM, Wedgwood K, Fey RE, Caul EO (2003) Epidemiol Infect 131:727–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jolan E, Walter DKM (2003) Curr Opin Infect Dis 16:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos RAT, Borges AMT, Costa PSS, Teixeira JMS, Giugliano LG, Leite JPG, Cardoso DDP (2007) Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102:209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawai K, O Brien MA, Goveia MG, Mast TC, El Khoury AC (2012) Vaccine 30:1244–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Webby RJ, Carville KS, Kirk MD, Greening G, Ratcliff RM, Crerar SK, Dempsey K, Sarna M, Stafford R, Patel M, Hall G (2007) Clin Infect Dis 44:1026–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson EJ, Katz BZ, Polin JA, Reddy S, Weinrobe MH, Noskin GA (2012) J Infect 64:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kathrin S, Reimar J, Christina S, Lüppo E, Jörg S, Günter K (2010) J Virol Methods 169:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fong TT, Lipp EK (2005) Microbiol Mol Biol R 69:357–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosa M, Dalton ERRA (2002) Pediatr Infect Dis J 21:1038–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong SA, Kwon J, Kim D, Yang S (2015) Biosens Bioelectron 64:338–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yan Y, Wang H, Gao L, Ji J, Ge Z, Zhu X, He P, Chen Z (2013) J Virol Methods 189:277–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruan J, Li M, Liu Y, Li Y, Li Y (2013) J Chromatogr B 921–922:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mao HX, Li YQ, Pei XF, He C, Lin Q (2007) Chin J Chromatogr 25:473–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang P, Ren J, Shen Z (2004) Electrophoresis 25:1823–1828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scherer K, Mäde D, Ellerbroek L, Schulenburg J, Johne R, Klein G (2009) Food Environ Virol 1:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. YoungBin P, You H, Cho YJ (2008) Appl Environ Microb 74:4226–4230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scherer K, Johne R, Schrader C, Ellerbroek L, Schulenburg J, Klein G (2010) J Virol Methods 169:22–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li YQ, Yang JG, Zhou Y, Zou XL, Mi JP, Zeng HY (2004) J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci Edi) 35:348–354

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y, White J, Stokes D, Sayler G, Sepaniak M (2001) Biotechnol Prog 17:348–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dubois E, Hennechart C, Merle G, Burger C, Hmila N, Ruelle S, Perelle S, Ferré V (2007) Int J Food Microbiol 117:141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pang XL, Preiksaitis JK, Lee B (2005) J ClinVirol 33:168–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arvelo W, Sosa SM, Juliao P, López MR, Estevéz A, López B, Morales-Betoulle ME, González M, Gregoricus NA, Hall AJ, Vinje J, Parashar U, Lindblade KA (2012) J ClinVirol 55:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jan V, Marion PGK (1996) J Infect Dis 174:610–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vennema H, de Bruin E, Koopmans M (2002) J Clin Virol 25:233–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jorge F, Johnna S, Irene PS, Laura W, Dorys G, Claudio L, Albert ZK (1990) J Virol 64:4021–4024

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kou XX, Wu QP, Wang DP, Guo WP, Deng MQ (2007) Microbiology 34:401–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Krishna NK (2005) Viral Immunol 18:17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhong JY, Zhu B, Zhou R, Wang CB, Xiao MS, Gong ST (2006) J Mod Clin Med Bioen 12:129–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schulz K, Wegner U, Gurtler L, Wiersbitzky S, Mentel R (2000) Eur J ClinMicrobiol Infect Dis 19:563–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacqueline SN, Terry WL, John BK, Roger IG, Stephan SM (1995) J Clin Microbiol 33:797–801

    Google Scholar 

  37. Huang Y, Li JQ, Li YF, Li YZ, Chen YD (2012) Chi Trop Med 12:671–672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Marion K, Erwin D (2004) Int J Food Microbiol 90:23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luciana C, Eric D, Ni gel C, Dario de M, Anna CS, Bernard C, Saskia AR, Jeffrey H, Wim HM Van der P (2008) Food Anal Methods 1:73–84

  40. Gillian DL, Theodore GM (1998) Appl Environ Microb 54:1983–1988

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li Q, Wu X, Liu Y, Wu Y, Gao G, Yang X (2011) Chin J Heath Lab Tech 21:382–386

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tuma RS, Beaudet MP, Jin X, Jones LJ, Cheung CY, Yue S, Singer VL (1999) Anal Biochem 268:278–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lekanne DR, Fijnvandraat AC, Ruijter JM, Moorman AF (2002) Anal Biochem 307:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants from Youth Foundation of National Natural Science of China (No. 81102162).

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work and that there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in the manuscript entitled “Capillary Electrophoresis-based Detection for Foodborne Enteroviruses in Vegetable Samples”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Xin Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10337_2015_2931_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 214 kb). Figure 1 SuppInfo. The sensitivity of norovirus, rotavirus and astrovirus and the electrophoretogram of Gene RulerTM Low Range DNA Ladder.The figures indicate the sizes of DNA fragments:1.25 bp 2.50 bp 3.75 bp 4.100 bp 5.150 bp 6.200 bp 7.300 bp 8.400 bp 9.500 bp 10.700 bp

10337_2015_2931_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 365 kb). Figure 2 SuppInfo. The gel electrophoresis figure of the RT-PCR products of the artificially inoculated samples

Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruan, J., Sun, C.J., Chen, F. et al. Capillary Electrophoresis-Based Detection for Foodborne Enteroviruses in Vegetable Samples. Chromatographia 78, 1191–1199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-2931-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-2931-x

Keywords

Navigation