Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding biology of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at the Beagle Channel: interannual variation and its relationship with foraging behaviour

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interannual variation in seabird foraging or reproductive behaviour may reflect fluctuations in marine resources. In this study, we evaluated different foraging and breeding parameters of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) from Martillo Island in the Beagle Channel, and the relationships between these parameters at different stages within the season (incubation, early and late chick-rearing) over three consecutive breeding seasons (2006–2007, 2007–2008 and 2008–2009). In 2007, we observed greater adult foraging effort (longer foraging trip duration and vertical travel distance, VTD) and lower chick feeding frequency, together with a slower growth rate and later fledging date of chicks, which we suggest was linked to lower food availability near the colony that year. The increased foraging effort appeared to be compensated by enhanced feeding activity (e.g., number of wiggles per dive). However, this increase did not coincide with a larger amount of food load brought to colony, which may have been due to a change in the type or size of prey consumed by the penguins. Magellanic Penguins from Martillo Island showed great plasticity in foraging behaviour, as evidenced by changes in consumed prey type or increased foraging effort and feeding activity when the consumption of their main prey item, Sprattus fuegensis, seemed to decrease. Moreover, during this particular breeding season, although the growth rate of chicks was lower, the breeding success remained constant throughout the study period, suggesting that the penguins managed to compensate for the apparent decrease in Fuegian sprat.

Zusammenfassung

Die Brutbiologie von Magellanpinguinen ( Spheniscus magellanicus ) im Beagle-Kanal: Variation zwischen Jahren und ihre Beziehung zum Nahrungserwerbsverhalten.

Interannuale Variation im Nahrungserwerbs- und/oder Fortpflanzungsverhalten von Seevögeln könnte Schwankungen im marinen Ressourcenangebot widerspiegeln. In dieser Studie haben wir unterschiedliche Nahrungs- und Brutparameter von Magellanpinguinen (Spheniscus magellanicus) auf der Martillo-Insel im Beagle-Kanal sowie die Beziehungen zwischen diesen Parametern in unterschiedlichen Stadien der Brutsaison (Bebrütung, frühe und späte Kükenaufzucht) in drei aufeinanderfolgenden Brutsaisons (2006–2007, 2007–2008 und 2008–2009) ausgewertet. Im Jahr 2007 haben die Altvögel mehr Aufwand in die Nahrungssuche investiert (längere Nahrungstrips und längere vertikale Wegstrecken, VTD) und die Küken weniger häufig gefüttert, und die Küken wuchsen langsamer und flogen später aus. Wir schlagen vor, dass dies mit einer geringeren Nahrungsverfügbarkeit in der Nähe der Kolonie in diesem Jahr zusammenhängt. Der höhere Nahrungssuchaufwand wurde offenbar durch eine erhöhte Nahrungsaufnahme (z. B. Anzahl der Bewegungen pro Tauchgang) ausgeglichen. Dieser Anstieg stand jedoch nicht mit einer größeren zur Kolonie gebrachten Nahrungsmenge in Einklang. Dies könnte auf eine Veränderung des Typs und/oder der Größe der von den Pinguinen aufgenommenen Nahrung zurückzuführen sein. Magellanpinguine von der Martillo-Insel zeigen große Plastizität in ihrem Nahrungserwerbsverhalten. Diese offenbart sich anhand von Veränderungen des konsumierten Nahrungstyps und/oder der Steigerung des Nahrungssuchaufwands und der Nahrungsaufnahme, wenn der Verzehr der Hauptnahrung der Pinguine, Sprattus fuegensis, scheinbar abnimmt. Zudem blieb in dieser bestimmten Brutsaison der Bruterfolg über den gesamten Untersuchungszeitraum hinweg konstant, obwohl die Wachstumsrate der Küken niedriger war. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass die Pinguine den offensichtlichen Rückgang ihrer Hauptbeute ausgleichen konnten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow KE, Croxall JP (2002) Provisioning behaviour of Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus. Ibis 144:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma DP (2008) Penguins as marine sentinels. Bioscience 58(7):597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma PD, Stokes DL, Yorio PM (1990) Reproductive variability and historical change of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at Punta Tombo, Argentina. In: Davis LS, Darby JT (eds) Penguin biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 15–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma D, Rebstock GA, Frere E, Moore SE (2009) Following the fish: penguins and productivity in the South Atlantic. Ecol Monogr 79(1):59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bost CA, Handrich Y, Butler PJ, Fahlman A, Halsey LG, Woakes AJ, Ropert-Coudert Y (2007) Changes in dive profiles as an indicator of feeding success in king and Adélie penguins. Deep Sea Res Part II 54(3):248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bost CA, Jaeger A, Huin W, Koubbi P, Halsey LG, Hanuise N, Handrich Y (2008) Monitoring prey availability via data loggers deployed on seabirds: advances and present limitations. Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 5th World Fisheries Congress, pp 121–137

  • Chappell MA, Shoemaker VH, Janes DN, Bucher TL, Maloney SK (1993) Diving behavior during foraging in breeding Adelie penguins. Ecology 74(4):1204–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino MA, Fraser WR, Patterson-Fraser DL, Saba VS, Oliver MJ (2014) Large-scale climate and local weather drive interannual variability in Adélie penguin chick fledging mass. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 513:253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen AP, Pütz K (2002) Recent trends in diet composition and productivity of Gentoo, Magellanic and Rockhopper Penguins in the Falkland Islands. Aquat Conserv 12:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Croll DA, Demer DA, Hewitt RP, Jansen JK, Goebel ME, Tershy BR (2006) Effects of variability in prey abundance on reproduction and foraging in chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis Antarctica). J Zool 269:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2009) Infostat. FCA Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KH, Woo K, Gaston AJ, Benvenuti S, Dall Antonia L, Davoren GK (2008) Seabird foraging behaviour indicates prey type. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 354:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KH, Woo KJ, Gaston AJ (2009) Specialization in murres: the story of eight specialists. Waterbirds 32:491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forero MG, Tella JL, Hobson KA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2002) Conspecific food competition explains variability in colony size: a test in Magellanic Penguins. Ecology 83:3466–3475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frere E, Gandini P, Boersma PD (1992) Effects of nest type and location on reproductive success of the Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus). Mar Ornithol 20:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Frere E, Gandini P, Boersma PD (1996) Aspectos particulares de la biología de reproducción y tendencia poblacional del pingüino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) en la colonia de Cabo Vírgenes, Santa Cruz, Argentina. Hornero 14:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Frere E, Gandini PA, Boersma D (1998) The breeding ecology of Magellanic Penguins at Cabo Vírgenes, Argentina: what factors determine reproductive success? Colon Waterbirds 21:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandini PA, Frere E, Helik TM (1992) Implicaciones de las diferencias en el tamaño corporal entre colonias para el uso de medidas morfométricas como método de sexados en Spheniscus magellanicus. Hornero 13:211–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandini P, Frere E, Boersma D (1997) Efectos de la calidad de hábitat sobre el éxito reproductivo del pingüino de Magallanes Spheniscus magellanicus en Cabo Vírgenes Santa Cruz, Argentina. Ornitol Neotrop 8:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuise N, Bost CA, Huin W, Auber A, Halsey LG, Handrich Y (2010) Measuring foraging activity in a deep-diving bird: comparing wiggles, oesophageal temperatures and beak-opening angles as proxies of feeding. J Exp Biol 213:3874–3880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hennicke JC, Culik BM (2005) Foraging performance and reproductive success of Humboldt penguins in relation to prey availability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 296:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horning M, Trillmich F (1997) Ontogeny of diving behaviour in the Galapagos fur seal. Behaviour 134:1211–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine LG, Clarke JR, Kerry KR (2000) Low breeding success of the Adélie penguin at Bechervaise Island in the 1998–1999 seasons CCAMLR. Science 7:151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Montevecchi WA (1993) Birds as indicators of change in marine prey stocks. In: Furness RW, Greenwood JJD (eds) Birds as monitors of environmental change. Chapman and Hall, Londres, pp 217–266

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Otley HM, Clausen AP, Christie DJ, Pütz K (2004) Aspects of the breeding biology of the Magellanic Penguin in the Falkland Islands. Waterbirds 27:396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatt JF, Sydeman WJ (2007) Seabirds as indicators of marine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 352:199–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Radl A, Culik BM (1999) Foraging behaviour and reproductive success in Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus): a comparative study of two colonies in southern Chile. Mar Biol 133:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raya Rey A, Trathan P, Schiavini A (2007) Interannual variation in provisioning behaviour of Southern Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome at Staten Island, Argentina. Ibis 149:826–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raya Rey A, Bost CA, Schiavini A, Pütz K (2010) Foraging movements of Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus in the Beagle Channel, Argentina, related to tide and tidal currents. J Ornithol 151:933–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raya Rey A, Pütz K, Scioscia G, Lüthi B, Schiavini A (2012) Sexual differences in the foraging behaviour of Magellanic Penguins related to stage of breeding. Emu 112:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raya Rey A, Rosciano N, Liljesthröm M, Sáenz Samaniego R, Schiavini A (2014) Species-specific population trends detected for penguins, gulls and cormorants over 20 years in sub-Antarctic Fuegian Archipelago. Pol Biol. doi:10.1007/s00300-014-1526-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid K, Croxall JP, Briggs DR, Murphy EJ (2005) Antarctic ecosystem monitoring: quantifying the response of ecosystem indicators to variability in Antartic krill. ICES J Mar Sci 62:366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richner H (1989) Habitat-specific growth and fitness in carrion crows (Corvus corone corone). J Anim Ecol 58:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1968) Patterns of growth in birds. Ibis 110:419–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropert-Coudert Y, Wilson RP, Daunt F, Kato A (2004) Patterns of energy acquisition by a central place forager: benefits of alternating short and long foraging trips. Behavioral Ecol 15(5):824–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala J, Wilson R, Frere E, Quintana F (2012a) Foraging effort in Magellanic Penguins in coastal Patagonia, Argentina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 464:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala JE, Wilson RP, Quintana F (2012b) How much is too much? Assessment of prey consumption by magellanic penguins in Patagonian colonies. PLoS One 7(12):e51487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sala JE, Wilson RP, Frere E, Quintana F (2014) Flexible foraging for finding fish: variable diving patterns in Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus from different colonies J Ornithol 155:801–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala J, Wilson R, Quintana F (2015) Foraging effort in Magellanic Penguins: balancing the energy books for survival? Mar Biol 162:501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavini A, Raya Rey A (2004) Long days, long trips: foraging ecology of female rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome chysocome at Tierra del Fuego. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 275:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scioscia G (2011) Ecología trófica del pingüino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) y sus implicancias en la ecología reproductiva en el Canal Beagle. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Tierra del Fuego

    Google Scholar 

  • Scioscia G, Raya Rey A, Madirolas A, Cabreira A, Tapella F, Schiavini A (2009) Patrones de distribución del pingüino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) y sus presas en el Canal Beagle. VII Jornadas Nacionales de Ciencias del Mar Bahia Blanca

  • Scioscia G, Raya Rey A, Favero M, Schiavini A (2010) Factores que afectan el éxito reproductivo y la calidad de la nidada en el Pingüino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) en el Canal Beagle, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Hornero 25:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Scioscia G, Raya Rey A, Saenz Samaniego RA, Florentín O, Schiavini A (2014) Intra- and interannual variation in the diet of the Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) at Martillo Island. Pol Biol, Beagle Channel. doi:10.1007/s00300-014-1532-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolaro JA (1984) Revisión sobre biología de la reproducción del pingüino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus). El ciclo biológico anual. Contribuciones Centro Nacional Patagónico 91:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolaro JA (1990) Effects of nest density on breeding success in a colony of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) Colon. Waterbirds 13:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeone A, Wilson RP (2003) In-depth studies of Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) foraging: can we estimate prey consumption by perturbations in the dive profile. Mar Biol 143:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman and Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes DL, Boersma PD (1998) Nest site characteristic and reproductive success in Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus). Auk 115:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Watanuki Y, Sato K, Arai N, Nishikawa J, Naito Y (2003) Parental foraging effort and offspring growth in Adélie Penguins: does working hard improve reproductive success? Funct Ecol 17:590–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A, Dunn MJ, Trathan PN, Croxall JP, Wilson RP, Sato K, Naito Y (2004) Krill-feeding behaviour by a Chinstrap Penguin Pygoscelis antarctica compared to fish-eating in Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus: a pilot study. Mar Ornithol 32:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2000) Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behavior in rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2003) Geographic variation in the foraging behavior, diet and chick growth of rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 251:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uttley J, Walton P, Monaghan P, Austin G (1994) The effects of food abundance on breeding performance and adult time budgets of guillemots Uria aalge. Ibis 136:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BG, Boersma PD (2003) Diving behavior of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at Punta Tombo, Argentina. Can J Zool 81:1471–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanuki Y, Kato A, Mori Y, Naito Y (1993) Diving performance of Adélie penguins in relation to food availability in fast sea-ice areas: comparison between years. J Anim Ecol 62(4):634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson (1984) An improved stomach pump for penguins and other seabirds. J Field Ornithol 55(1):110–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP (2003) Penguins predict their performance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 249:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Pütz K, Peters G, Culik B, Scolaro JA, Charrassin JB, Ropert-Coudert Y (1997) Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds. Wildl Soc Bull 25(1):101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Scolaro JA, Grémillet D, Kierspel MAM, Laurenti S, Upton J, Gallelli H, Quintana F, Frere E, Müller G, Straten MT, Zimmer I (2005) How do Magellanic Penguins cope with variability in their access to prey? Ecol Monogr 75:379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Shepard ELC, Laich AG, Frere E, Quintana F (2010) Pedalling downhill and freewheeling up; a penguin perspective on foraging. Aquat Biol 8:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, McMahon CR, Quintana F, Frere E, Scolaro A, Hays GC, Bradshaw CJ (2011) N-dimensional animal energetic niches clarify behavioural options in a variable marine environment. J Exp Biol 214:646–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R, Sala J, Gómez-Laich A, Ciancio J, Quintana F (2015) Pushed to the limit: food abundance determines tag-induced harm in penguins. Anim Welfare 24(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Boersma PD (1994a) Causes of nest desertion during incubation in the Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus Magellanicus). Condor 96:1076–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Boersma PD (1994b) Consequences of nest desertion and inattendance for Magellanic Penguin hatching success. Auk 111(1):215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, García Borboroglu P, Potti J, Moreno J (2001) Breeding biology of Magellanic Penguins Spheniscus magellanicus at Golfo San Jorge, Patagonia, Argentina. Mar Ornithol 29:75–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was made possible through the support of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Financial support was provided by the Wildlife Conservation Society. We thank Jorge, Andrés and Alejandro Greco from Piratour for logistic support and transportation to the island. We are also grateful to volunteers of the Museo Acatushun de Aves y Mamíferos Asutrales and to Natalie Goodall. We thank Ricardo Saenz Samaniego, Mariano Diez, Marcela Liljesthröm, Natalia Paso Viola, Noelia Volpe, Guillermo Panisse, M. Florencia Colavita, Alfredo Barreto, Constanza Alberio, Natalia Dellabianca, N. Rosciano, Federico Tapella, Olga Florentín and M. Paula Sotelano for field or laboratory assistance, and Marcela Liljesthröm and Sabrina Harris for advice on language. We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for providing useful suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Scioscia.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Barbraud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scioscia, G., Raya Rey, A. & Schiavini, A. Breeding biology of Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) at the Beagle Channel: interannual variation and its relationship with foraging behaviour. J Ornithol 157, 773–785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-016-1341-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-016-1341-7

Keywords

Navigation