Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of fen management on bird communities in north-eastern Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fens and their associated bird species assemblages have undergone dramatic declines in recent decades. Given that many remaining or restored fens are currently lying fallow, an important question is which management regime, if any, is most effective in preserving fen-typical species. Against this background, we here investigate the effects of five management regimes (intensive grassland, moist meadows, summer-harvested sites, winter-harvested sites, fallows) on bird communities in riverine fens in north-eastern Germany. Summer-harvested sites, resembling the historical management of wet meadows, were overall most effective to promote fen-typical bird species, while intensive grassland management was inappropriate. However, some species of conservation concern had their strongholds in other management types such as winter-harvested sites and fallows. Thus, owing to species-specific differences, a mixture of different management regimes is necessary to conserve the full range of fen-typical species. Managing a higher proportion of moist fallows than is currently the case seems to benefit conservation, as long as enough fallows remain. Our study also shows that a successful restoration of fen habitat for associated bird species relies on the realization of appropriate water levels.

Zusammenfassung

Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Nutzungsformen auf die Avifauna nordostdeutscher Niedermoore

Niedermoore und ihre Vogelgemeinschaften mussten in den letzten Jahrzenten dramatische Rückgänge hinnehmen. Da mittlerweile zahlreiche Niedermoore brach liegen stellt sich die Frage, welche Nutzungsformen am besten geeignet sind das niedermoortypische Artenspektrum zu erhalten bzw. ob es dazu überhaupt einer Nutzung bedarf. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde der Einfluss fünf unterschiedlicher Nutzungsformen (Intensivgrünland, Feuchtwiesen, Sommermahd, Wintermahd, Brachen) auf die Vogelgemeinschaften eines nordostdeutschen Niedermoores untersucht. Die den historischen Feuchtwiesen vergleichbaren Sommermahdflächen waren am effektivsten im Erhalt niedermoortypischer Arten, während sich das Intensivgrünland dafür als besonders ungeeignet erwies. Jedoch auch die Wintermahdflächen und Brachen waren für bestimmte naturschutzfachlich bedeutsame Arten von großer Bedeutung. Aufgrund artspezifischer Unterschiede in den Habitatpräferenzen erscheint daher ein Mosaik unterschiedlicher Nutzungsformen notwendig zu sein, um das gesamte niedermoortypische Artenspektrum zu erhalten. Dennoch wäre die Nutzung eines höheren Anteils nasser Brachen naturschutzfachlich wünschenswert, solange ausreichend Brachflächen erhalten bleiben. Desweiteren zeigt diese Studie die große Bedeutung günstiger Wasserstände für die erfolgreiche Renaturierung von Niedermooren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg Å (1992) Factors affecting nest-site choice and reproductive success of Curlews Numenius arquata on farmland. Ibis 134:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å, Jonsson M, Lindberg T, Källebrink KG (2002) Population dynamics and reproduction of Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus in a meadow restoration area in central Sweden. Ibis 144:E131–E140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Lunn J (1982) Conservation of reed-beds and their avifauna in England and Wales. Biol Conserv 23:167–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bignal EM, McCracken DI (2000) The nature conservation value of European traditional farming systems. Environ Rev 8:149–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2008) State of the world’s birds: indicators for our changing world. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Busche G (1994) Zum Niedergang von „Wiesenvögeln“in Schleswig-Holstein 1950 bis 1992. J Ornithol 135:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RGH, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37:771–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Pisano G, Rayment MD, Pain DJ (2002) The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Van Bommel FPJ (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible assymetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichstädt W, Sellin D, Zimmermann H (2003) Rote Liste der Brutvögel Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns, 2nd edn. Ministerium für Landwirtschaft,Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin

    Google Scholar 

  • Flade M (1994) Die Brutvogelgemeinschaften Mittel- und Norddeutschlands. IHW, Eching

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RJ, Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Marchant JH, Wilson JD, Baillie SR, Carter N (1995) Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conserv Biol 9:1425–1441

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert G, Tyler GA, Dunn CJ, Smith KW (2005) Nesting habitat selection by bitterns Botaurus stellaris in Britain and the implications for wetland management. Biol Conserv 124:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Goc M, Iliszko L, Kopiec K (1997) The effect of reed harvesting on reedbed birds community. Ring 19:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Görn S, Fischer K (2011) Niedermoore Nordostdeutschlands bewerten—Vorschlag für ein faunistisches Bewertungsverfahren. Natschutz Landschpfl 43:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Görn S, Dobner B, Suchanek A, Fischer K (2014) Assessing human impact on fen biodiversity: effects of different management regimes on butterfly, grasshopper, and carabid beetle assemblages. Biodivers Conserv 23:309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Graveland J (1998) Reed die-back, water level management and the decline of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in The Netherlands. Ardea 86:187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE (1996) Factors affecting the population density of the corncrake Crex crex in Britain and Ireland. J Appl Ecol 33:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennicke F (2001) Das Naturschutzgroßprojekt ‘Peenetal-Landschaft’. In: Succow M, Joosten H (eds) Landschaftsökologische Moorkunde, 2nd edn. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, pp 487–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Holz R, Sellin D, Erdmann F (1983) Dynamik und Status der Avizönose des NSG „Peenetalmoor“– ein Beitrag zur Pflegekonzeption. Arch Natursch Landschaftsforsch 23:223–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten H (1997) European mires: a preliminary status report. Int Mire Conserv Group Memb Newsl 3:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimadaten der DDR (1987) Reihe B.–Bd. 14.–Klimatologische Normalwerte 1951/80. Meteorologischer Dienst der DDR, Potsdam

  • Klimkowska A, Van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Kotowski W (2010) Prospects for fen meadow restoration on severely degraded fens. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotze DJ, O’Hara RB (2003) Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135:138–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kube J, Probst S (1999) Bestandsabnahme bei schilfbewohnenden Vogelarten an der südlichen Ostseeküste: welchen Einfluß hat die Schilfmahd auf die Brutvogeldichte? Vogelwelt 120:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva EA (1998) Waders in agricultural habitats of European Russia. Int Wader Stud 10:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyer I, Wesche K (2007) Multivariate Statistik in der Ökologie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini L, Fontana P, Battisti A, Gaston KJ (2009) Response of orthopteran diversity to abandonment of semi-natural meadows. Agric Ecosyst Environ 132:232–236

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. version 5.0 MjM Software. Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (2004) The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis 146:579–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Hammarstedt O, Nilsson SG, Smith HG (2006) The relationship between local extinctions of grassland butterflies and increased soil nitrogen levels. Biol Conserv 128:564–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H (2008) The vegan package version 1.17-4. http://cran.r-project.org/, http://vegan.r-forge.rproject.org/. Accessed 13 Oct 2013

  • Phillips A (1998) The nature of cultural landscapes: a nature conservation perspective. Landsc Res 23:21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Höchtl F, Spek T (2006) Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environ Sci Policy 9:317–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin B, Lefebvre G (2002) Effect of winter cutting on the passerine breeding assemblage in French Mediterranean reedbeds. Biodivers Conserv 11:1567–1581

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin B, Lefebvre G, Mathevet R (2005) Habitat selection by booming bitterns Botaurus stellaris in French Mediterranean reed-beds. Oryx 39:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulin B, Lefebvre G, Allard S, Mathevet R (2009) Reed harvest and summer drawdown enhance bittern habitat in the Camargue. Biol Conserv 142:689–695

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodbergen M, Van der Werf B, Hötker H (2012) Revealing the contributions of reproduction and survival to the Europe-wide decline in meadow birds: review and meta-analysis. J Ornithol 153:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin D, Schirmeister B (2012) Der Limikolenbrutbestand im unteren Peenetal bei Anklam im Zeitraum von 2001 bis 2012. Ornithol Rundbr Meckelnbg-Vorpomm 47:219–236

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2007) STATISTICA for Windows (software system for data analysis) version 8.0. www.statsoft.com

  • Südbeck P, Andretzke H, Fischer S, Gedeon K, Schikore T, Schröder K, Sudfeldt (eds) (2005) Methodenstandards zur Erfassung der Brutvögel Deutschlands. Dachverband Deutscher Avifaunisten, Radolfzell

  • Südbeck P, Bauer HG, Boschert M, Boye P, Knief W (2007) Rote Liste der Brutvögel Deutschlands, 4th. edn. Ber Vogelschutz 44:23–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanneberger F, Bellebaum J, Fartmann T, Haferland HJ, Helmecke A, Jehle P, Just P, Sadlik J (2008) Rapid deterioration of Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola habitats at the western margin of the breeding range. J Ornithol 139:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanneberger F, Tegetmeyer C, Dylawerski M, Flade M, Joosten H (2009) Commercially cut reed as a new and sustainable habitat for the globally threatened Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. Biodivers Conserv 18:1475–1489

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanneberger F, Flade M, Preiksa Z, Schröder B (2010) Habitat selection of the globally threatened Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola at the western margin of its breeding range and implications for management. Ibis 152:347–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann T, Margóczi K, Takács G, Vegelin K (2006) Restoration of peat-forming vegetation by rewetting species-poor fen grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 9:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler GA, Smith KW, Burges DJ (1998) Reedbed management and breeding bitterns Botaurus stellaris in the UK. Biol Conserv 86:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadász C, Német Á, Biró C, Csörgő T (2008) The effect of reed cutting on the abundance and diversity of breeding passerines. Acta Zool Acad Sci H 54:177–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkama J, Robertson P, Currie D (1998) Habitat selection by breeding curlews (Numenius arquata) on farmland: the importance of grassland. Ann Zool Fenn 35:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Diggelen R, Middleton B, Bakker J, Grootjans J, Wassen M (2006) Fens and floodplains of the temperate zone: present status, threats, conservation and restoration. Appl Veg Sci 9:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst J, Báldi A, Kleijn D (2004) Relationship between land-use intensity and species richness and abundance of birds in Hungary. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:465–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst J, Kleijn D, Loonen W, Berendse F, Smit C (2011) Seasonal distribution of meadow birds in relation to in-field heterogeneity and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery JA, Tallowin JR, Feber RE, Asteraki EJ, Atkinson PW, Fuller RJ, Brown VK (2001) The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. J Appl Ecol 38:647–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassen MJ, Venterink HO, Lapshina ED, Tanneberger F (2005) Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 437:547–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wichtmann W, Wichmann S (2011) Paludikultur: standortgerechte Bewirtschaftung wiedervernässter Moore. Telma Suppl 4:215–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichtmann W, Tanneberger F, Wichmann S, Joosten H (2010) Paludiculture is paludifuture—climate, biodiversity and economic benefits from agriculture and forestry on rewetted peatland. Peatl Int 1:48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AM, Ausden M, Milsom TP (2004) Changes in breeding wader populations on lowland wet grasslands in England and Wales: causes and potential solutions. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):32–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, Johnson R, Laczko E, McCracken D, Matouch S, Niemela J, Richards C (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers Conserv 14:1641–1661

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe S, Steffenhagen P, Parakenings K, Timmermann T, Frick A, Gelbrecht J, Zak D (2013) Ecosystem Service Restoration after 10 years of rewetting peatlands in NE Germany. Environ Manag 51:1194–1209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gunnar Dachsel, Bernd Dobner, Axinia Suchanek, and Knut Weidemann for support during field work, and Jens Kulbe, Franziska Tanneberger and Christian Schröder for support and for sharing their knowledge about Western-Pomeranian fens with us. We are indebted to three reviewers for helpful and constructive criticism. Financial support was provided by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the funding scheme “Sustainable Land Management“(FKZ 033L030). The study complied with the current German law and access to nature reserves was granted by the Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Vorpommern.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Görn.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 List of all recorded breeding bird species

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Görn, S., Schulze, F. & Fischer, K. Effects of fen management on bird communities in north-eastern Germany. J Ornithol 156, 287–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1125-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1125-x

Keywords

Navigation