Erratum to: Paddy Water Environ (2015) 13: 229–240 DOI 10.1007/s10333-014-0432-4
In the original publication of this article, Table 2 header has been mentioned incorrectly. Now the correct header is provided in this erratum.
In Table 2 (page 237), percentile discharges on line 1 marking the rated discharges should be: Q max, Q t10, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50 and Q t60, instead of: Q max, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50, Q t60 and Q t70.
In addition to that, the text in the following lines must be modified according to the above changes in the header, which means each of Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50, Q t60 and Q t70 appearing in the original text should be replaced by Q t10, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50 and Q t60, respectively. Line 54 in page 236; lines 3, 5, 6, 7, 10 in page 237; lines 2, 5 in page 238; lines 5, 13, 14, 28, 42 in page 239; and the legend of Fig. 8 (page 238).
In addition, the sentence on line 52 page 236 should be read as: therefore, the rated discharge Q r varies from Q max to 10, 20, …, 60 percentile discharges Q t10, Q t20, …, Q t60 evaluated in Fig. 7. And the following sentence (line 54, page 236) should be erased: (10 percentile values are omitted as they are exactly the same as the 20 percentile values.
The authors regret the mistakes would appear extensively and confuse the readers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10333-014-0432-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ueda, T., Goto, M., Namihira, A. et al. Erratum to: Water management strategies for hydropower annexation at existing irrigation dams in Japan. Paddy Water Environ 15, 697 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0578-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0578-3