Erratum to: Paddy Water Environ (2015) 13: 229–240 DOI 10.1007/s10333-014-0432-4

In the original publication of this article, Table 2 header has been mentioned incorrectly. Now the correct header is provided in this erratum.

In Table 2 (page 237), percentile discharges on line 1 marking the rated discharges should be: Q max, Q t10, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50 and Q t60, instead of: Q max, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50, Q t60 and Q t70.

In addition to that, the text in the following lines must be modified according to the above changes in the header, which means each of Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50, Q t60 and Q t70 appearing in the original text should be replaced by Q t10, Q t20, Q t30, Q t40, Q t50 and Q t60, respectively. Line 54 in page 236; lines 3, 5, 6, 7, 10 in page 237; lines 2, 5 in page 238; lines 5, 13, 14, 28, 42 in page 239; and the legend of Fig. 8 (page 238).

In addition, the sentence on line 52 page 236 should be read as: therefore, the rated discharge Q r varies from Q max to 10, 20, …, 60 percentile discharges Q t10, Q t20, …, Q t60 evaluated in Fig. 7. And the following sentence (line 54, page 236) should be erased: (10 percentile values are omitted as they are exactly the same as the 20 percentile values.

The authors regret the mistakes would appear extensively and confuse the readers.