Skip to main content
Log in

Low efficiency of sewage treatment plants due to unskilled operations in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Chemistry Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Centralized sewage treatment plants may not be a sustainable solution for a developing country such as India. Therefore, we conducted for the first time an integrated assessment of the different technologies currently used for sewage treatment in the state of West Bengal, India. Five decentralized sewage treatment plants and one centralized sewage treatment plant located in different parts of Kolkata were evaluated. We compared influent and effluent water quality, energy consumed, capital and operating costs, and treated wastewater reuse potential. F test was used to validate results on the effect of working days and holidays and seasons on treated water quality. Wastewater management strategy was assessed by performance indicators. Our results show that treatment efficiency was lowest in anaerobic plants not because of faulty technology but due to unskilled operation. Therefore, performance improvement of plants is expected if factors such as monitoring, training of staff, regular and scrupulous desludging, reuse aspects, and rational water tariff are implemented earnestly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1998) WEF, standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 20th edition-4500-NO3-D nitrate electrode method. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber WP, Stuckey DC (1999) The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 33(7):1559–1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Das S (2010) Estimating the value of improved wastewater treatment: the case of River Ganga, India. J Environ Manag 91(11):2163–2171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buntner D, Sánchez A, Garrido JM (2013) Feasibility of combined UASB and MBR system in dairy wastewater treatment at ambient temperatures. Chem Eng J 230:475–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calheiros CSC, Bessa VS, Mesquita RBR, Brix H, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2015) Constructed wetland with a polyculture of ornamental plants for wastewater treatment at a rural tourism facility. Ecol Eng 79:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Chen B (2013) Net energy production and emissions mitigation of domestic wastewater treatment system: a comparison of different biogas-sludge use alternatives. Bioresour Technol 144:296–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2005) Status of Sewage Treatment in India, Central Pollution Control Board, India. http://www.cpcb.nic.in/newitems/12.pdf. 3 Sept 2014

  • CPCB (2013) Performance evaluation of sewage treatment plants under NRCD, Central Pollution Control Board, India. http://cpcb.nic.in/upload/NewItems/NewItem_195_STP_REPORT.pdf. 3 Sept 2014

  • Daghrir R, Drogui P (2013) Coupled electrocoagulation-electro-Fenton for efficient domestic wastewater treatment. Environ Chem Lett 11(2):151–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia SN, Clubbs RL, Stanley JK, Scheffe B, Yelderman JC Jr, Brooks BW (2013) Comparative analysis of effluent water quality from a municipal treatment plant and two on-site wastewater treatment systems. Chemosphere 92(1):38–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libralato G, Volpi Ghirardini A, Avezzù F (2012) To centralise or to decentralise: an overview of the most recent trends in wastewater treatment management. J Environ Manage 94(1):61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SJ, Kim TH (2014) Applicability and trends of anaerobic granular sludge treatment processes. Biomass Bioenergy 60:189–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mankad A, Tapsuwan S (2011) Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems. J Environ Manag 92(3):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90(1):652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia G, Molinos-Senante M, Hospido A, Hernández-Sancho F, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 45(18):5997–6010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sujaritpong S, Nitivattananon V (2009) Factors influencing wastewater management performance: case study of housing estates in suburban Bangkok, Thailand. J Environ Manag 90(1):455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suriyachan C, Nitivattananon V, Amin ATMN (2012) Potential of decentralized wastewater management for urban development: case of Bangkok. Habitat Int 36(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Haandel AC, Lettinga G (1994) Anaerobic sewage treatment: a practical guide for regions with a hot climate. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grant received from Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (File No. DST/IMRCD/SARASWATI/2012/(CP)(ii)), to undertake this work is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Ghangrekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatterjee, P., Ghangrekar, M.M. & Rao, S. Low efficiency of sewage treatment plants due to unskilled operations in India. Environ Chem Lett 14, 407–416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0551-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0551-9

Keywords

Navigation