Abstract
I describe variation in leaf morphology of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata assemblages within and among their contact zones. Such relationships provide a relatively fast and accurate method for detecting hybridization. Using discriminant function (DF) analysis based on leaf characteristics, I was able to differentiate between these two species in pure zones. In three of five contact zones, the DF scores showed broad, continuous distributions with three or more peaks. The trees showing intermediate leaf morphology are considered to be hybrids. In the other two contact zones, the DF scores showed distinct bimodal distributions, suggesting that Q. crispula and Q. dentata rarely hybridize in these sites. Thus, the method described in this study should be effective for detecting probable hybridization between these two species in contact zones, and the relative frequency of hybridization among contact zones. However, there was likely to be intraspecific variation of Q. crispula between geographic ranges, restricting interpretations to patterns occurring within sites or limited geographic ranges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A (1996) Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50:900–908
Blue MP, Jensen RJ (1988) Positional and seasonal variation in oak (Quercus; Fagaceae) leaf morphology. Am J Bot 75:939–947
Cherniawsky DM, Bayer RJ (1998) Systematics of North American Petasites (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), I: morphometric analyses. Can J Bot 76:23–36
Edwards-Burke MA, Hamrick JL, Price RA (1997) Frequency and direction of hybridization in sympatric populations of Pinus taeda and P. echinata (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 84:879–886
Gange AC (1995) Aphid performance in an alder (Alnus) hybrid zone. Ecology 76:2074–2083
González-Rodríguez A, Oyama K (2005) Leaf morphometric variation in Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two hybridizing Mexican red oaks. Bot J Linn Soc 147:427–435
Hashizume H, Suo Z, Lee JH, Okada S, Yamamoto F (1994) Fundamental studies on the breeding of Quercus species, III: on the characters of leaves and fruits in natural hybrids among Q. dentata, Q. serrata and Q. mongolica var. grosseserrata. Trans Jpn For Soc 105:325–328
Howard DJ, Preszler RW, Williams J, Fenchel S, Boecklen WJ (1997) How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51:747–755
Ishida TA, Hattori K, Sato H, Kimura MT (2003) Differentiation and hybridization between Quercus crispula and Q. dentata (Fagaceae): insights from morphological traits, amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and leafminer composition. Am J Bot 90:769–776
Kadomatsu M (1983) Studies on geographical variations of Mizunara oak (Quercus mongolica Fisch. var. grosseserrata Rehd. et Wils.). Res Bull Exp For Hokkaido Univ 40:1–48
Kofidis G, Bosabalidis AM, Moustakas M (2003) Contemporary seasonal and altitudinal variations of leaf structural features in oregano (Origanum vulgare L.). Ann Bot 92:635–645
Lee JH, Kwon KW, Yu JE (2001) Characteristic trichomes of artificial hybrids in Quercus species, III. J Korean For Sci 90:19–27
Miyazaki Y, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Igarashi T, Matsuda K, Funakoshi S, Kadomatsu M, Kurahashi A (1986) Ecological genetic studies of Quercus in Hokkaido, III: inter-specific hybridization. Trans Jpn For Soc 97:417–418
Miyazaki Y, Inoue S, Okano T, Igarashi T, Matsuda K, Funakoshi S, Kadomatsu M, Yajima T, Kurahashi A (1988) Ecological genetic studies of Quercus in Hokkaido, VI: morphological variations of Q. crispula. Trans Jpn For Soc 99:261–262
Nason JD, Ellstrand NC, Arnold ML (1992) Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. Am J Bot 79:101–111
Orita H, Koono K, Okuyama K, Eiga S (1991) On genetic characters of leaf forms in Quercus. Trans Meet Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc 39:44–46
Potts BM, Reid JB (1985) Analysis of hybrid swarm between Eucalyptus risdonii Hook. F. and E. amygdalina Labill. Aust J Bot 33:543–562
Rushton BS (1993) Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Ann For Sci 50:73–90
Shimada K, Ide Y, Kadomatsu M, Suzuki K (1993) Genetic variations of Quercus crispula, Q. dentata, Q. crispula × dentata and Q. mongolica, I: morphological variations of leaves and stellate hairs. Trans Jpn For Soc 104:485–486
Shimizu H, Kikuchi K, Yamada K (1995) Local variation of bud number on axillary buds of bud-scales of Quercus dentata in coastal forest along Japan sea of Hokkaido. Trans Meet Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc 43:140–142
Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2004) Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1352–1363
Ubukata M, Hayashi E, Tando O, Koono K (1994) Provenance variation in flushing of Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata in Hokkaido. Trans Jpn For Soc 105:451–452
Ubukata M, Iizuka K, Kohono K (1999) Repeatability and geographic variation of some leaf and acorn characteristics of Mizunara (Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata) in Hokkaido. J Jpn For Soc 81:305–310
Wigston DL (1974) Cytology and genetics of oaks. In: Morris MG, Perring FH (eds) The British oak. Classey, Berkshire, pp 27–50
Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Acknowledgments
I thank the District Forest Offices in Hokkaido, the Forestry Agency, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and the Tokachi Station, National Livestock Breeding Center, for permission to use the study sites. Thanks are also due to A. Ueda, K. Ozaki, K. Sayama, K. Tabuchi, S. Arai, T. Ito, and E. Yuyama, for their help throughout the study, and to R. Johns for his comments on the early draft. This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ito, M. Variation in leaf morphology of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata assemblages among contact zones: a method for detection of probable hybridization. J For Res 14, 240–244 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-009-0121-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-009-0121-0