Abstract
Export experience of managers and other top specialists is among the key drivers of export decisions in firms. We show evidence of this regularity based on employer-employee level data from the manufacturing industry in Estonia. We find that hiring managers and other high-wage employees with prior experience in exporting to a specific geographical region is associated with a higher probability of export entry to that region. Experience matters only if it is region specific and it is especially important for entry to neighbouring markets (the 1st markets of entry). However, there is less evidence of effects on export intensity. Notably, the relationship between export experience and a firm’s export entry decisions is stronger if the export experience is recent and if it comes from an exporter that is located nearby in the product space.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
However, we note that the evidence is not fully conclusive about the role of prior experience and presence of employees with export experience. For example, a small cross-section survey that provides descriptive evidence of rapidly internationalizing Chinese firms by Vissak et al. (2012) suggests no significant role of prior experience with foreign markets in the rapid expansion of Chinese international new ventures.
However, papers that investigate specifically the effects of mobility of export experienced managers (e.g. Mion and Opromolla 2014) have not yet investigated the likely different effects of their recent experience on export decisions compared to the older experience.
Still such a classification will result in some errors as some non-managers are expected to earn more than some managers. However, in the Estonian data such an approximation should result in a relatively low error rate given the relatively high wage inequality and high relative returns to managerial occupations (as compared to countries like Sweden with much more compressed wage distribution). For example, in 2010 according to the structure of earnings survey in Estonia, the ratio of the 90th to the 10th wage percentile was 4.1 versus 3.7 in the old EU members (EU15). Concerning occupations, while in Estonia managers (ISCO category 1) earned 3.1 times more than the lowest paid occupational group, in the UK (which does not have a low level of wage inequality) just 2.4 times more and in Ireland 1.9 times more (based on Eurostat data). Therefore, in the case of Estonia, wages differ relatively more across occupations, and that should provide some support to our wage-based proxy for occupation.
For example, the share of firms exporting to group 4 is just 23 % among the firms exporting for the first year, but 41 % among those exporting for the 7th year.
We thank Martti Randveer and Tiia Vissak for pointing out this issue.
However, we note that for a more detailed study of this issue one has to look also into the relationship between the loss of human capital in terms of export experienced employees leaving the firm and firm’s propensity of exit.
References
Aitken, B., Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. Journal of International Economics, 43(1–2), 103–132.
Albornoz, F., Calvo Pardo, H., Corcos, G., & Ornelas, E. (2012). Sequential exporting. Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 17–31.
Balsvik, R. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 285–297.
Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2003). Explaining firms’ export behaviour: R&D, spillovers and the destination market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4), 475–496.
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2004a). Exporting and productivity in the USA. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(3), 343–357.
Bernard, A., & Jensen, J. B. (2004b). Why do firms export. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 561–569.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cornelissen, T. (2008). The Stata command felsdvreg to fit a linear model with two high-dimensional fixed effects. The Stata Journal, 8(2), 170–189.
Dustmann, C., & Meghir, C. (2005). Wages, experience and seniority. Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 77–108.
Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2011). An anatomy of international trade: Evidence from French firms. Econometrica, 79(5), 1453–1498.
Eurostat (2014). Index of correspondence tables. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/relations/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_REL Last Accessed May 30, 2014.
Feenstra, R. C., Lipsey, R. E., Deng, H., Ma, A. C. & Mo, H. (2005). World trade flows: 1996–2000. (NBER Working Paper No. 11040).
Foster-McGregor, N., Isaksson, A., & Kaulich, F. (2014). Importing, exporting and performance in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 150(2), 309–336.
Glass, A., & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55, 369–398.
Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171–197.
Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2005). Spillovers from foreign firms through workers mobility: An empirical investigation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(4), 693–709.
Hausmann, R. & Klinger, B. (2006). Structural transformation and patterns of comparative advantage in the product space. (CID Working Paper No. 128).
Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487.
Hiller, S. (2013). Does immigrant employment matter for exports? Evidence from Denmark. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 149(2), 369–394.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.
Javorcik, B. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.
Koenig, P., Mayneris, F., & Poncet, S. (2010). Local export spillovers in France. European Economic Review, 54(4), 622–641.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.
Love, J., Roper, S., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Experience, age and exporting performance in UK SMEs. (Enterprise Research Centre Research Paper No. 28).
Markusen, J. R., & Trofimenko, N. (2009). Teaching locals new tricks: Foreign experts as a channel of knowledge transfers. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 120–131.
Martins, P. S. (2005). Inter-firm employee mobility, displacement, and foreign direct investment spillovers. Queen Mary University of London (mimeo).
Masso, J., & Vahter, P. (2015). Exporting and productivity: The effects of multi-market and multi-product export entry. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. doi:10.1111/sjpe.12077.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
Minondo, A. (2011). Learning to export with new managers. Empirical Economics Letters, 10(1), 7–11.
Mion, G., & Opromolla, L. D. (2014). Managers’ mobility, trade status, and wages. Journal of International Economics, 94(1), 85–101.
Molina, D., & Muendler, M. (2013). Preparing to export. (NBER Working Papers 18962).
Moxnes, A. (2010). Are sunk costs in exporting country specific? Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(2), 467–493.
Parrotta, P., & Pozzoli, D. (2012). The effect of learning by hiring on productivity. RAND Journal of Economics, 43(1), 167–185.
Poole, J. P. (2013). Knowledge transfers from multinational to domestic firms: Evidence from worker mobility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 393–406.
Rauch, J., & Watson, J. (2003). Starting small in an unfamiliar environment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(2003), 1021–1042.
Roberts, M. J., & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The decision to export in Colombia: An empirical model of entry with sunk costs. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–564.
Sala, D., & Yalcin, E. (2014). Export experience of managers and the internationalization of firms. The World Economy. doi:10.1111/twec.12222.
Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 809–829.
Silvente, F., & Giménez, J. (2007). Information spillovers and the choice of export destination: A multinomial logit analysis of Spanish young SMEs. Small Business Economics, 28(1), 69–86.
Stock, J., Wright, J., & Yogo, M. (2002). A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(4), 518–529.
Stoyanov, A., & Zubanov, N. (2012). Productivity spillovers across firms through worker mobility. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 168–198.
The Product Space (2005). http://www.chidalgo.com/productspace/index.htm. Last Accessed May 28, 2014.
Vissak, T., Zhang, X., & Ukrainski, K. (2012). Successful born globals without experiential market knowledge: Survey evidence from China. In M. Gabrielsson & V. H. M. Kirpalani (Eds.), Handbook of research on born globals. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: A survey of evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy, 30(1), 60–82.
Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 148(2), 235–267.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Statistics Estonia for granting access to the data used in the paper. The datasets have been processed in accordance with the confidentiality requirements of Statistics Estonia. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Estonian Science Foundation project No. 8311, the Ministry of Education and Research of the Republic of Estonia target financed project No. SF0180037s08 and Estonian Research Agency project No. IUT20-49 “Structural Change as the Factor of Productivity Growth in the Case of Catching up Economies”. We thank the participants of the MEIDE 2013 conference, Estonian Economic Association 2014 conference, seminar at the University of Sheffield and F. Requena-Silvente, Professor J. Love, O. Toomet and A. Võrk for useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Descriptive statistics
See Table 8.
Appendix 2: Tests of significance: Does the role of experience vary in different destination markets?
See Table 9.
Appendix 3: Different types of export experience and firm’s export decisions
See Table 10.
Appendix 4: Wage premium of prior export experience
See Table 11.
About this article
Cite this article
Masso, J., Rõigas, K. & Vahter, P. Foreign market experience, learning by hiring and firm export performance. Rev World Econ 151, 659–686 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-015-0224-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-015-0224-y