Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable management of biodiversity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terrestrial and marine biodiversity provides the basis for both ecosystems functioning and numerous commodities or services that underpin human well-being. From several decades, alarming trends have been reported worldwide for both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Therefore the sustainable management of biodiversity requires a double viewpoint balancing ecological conservation with the welfare of human societies. Understanding the underlying trade-offs, synergies and interactions imposes the development of interdisciplinary researches and methods. In that respect, bio-economic or ecological economic modeling is likely to play a major role. The present paper intends to elicit the key features, strengths and challenges of bio-economic approaches especially in mathematical and computational terms. It first recall the main bio-economic methods, models and decisional instruments used in these types of analyses. Then the paper shows to what extent bio-economic sustainability lies between equilibrium, viability and optimality mathematical frameworks. It ends up by identifying new major challenges among which the operationalization of ecosystem based management, the precautionary principle and the implementation of governance are especially important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. International Panel for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: http://www.ipbes.net/.

References

  • Aubin J-P (1990) A survey of viability theory. SIAM J Control Optim 28(4):749–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner S, Quaas MF (2009) Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability uncertainty. Ecol Econ 68:2008–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné C, Doyen L (2008) Valuing biodiversity and the contribution of species richness to ecosystem sustainability. Ecol Econ 68(1–2):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béné C, Doyen L, Gabay D (2001) A viability analysis for a bio-economic model. J Ecol Econ 36:385–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørndal T, Conrad MJ (1987) The dynamics of an open access fishery. Can J Econ 20(1):74–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SH et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron KW, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, New York

  • Cissé A, Gourguet S, Blanchard F, Doyen L, Pereau J-C (2013) A bio-economic model for the viable management of the coastal fishery in French Guyana. Environ Dev Econ 1–25

  • Clark CW (1990) Mathematical bioeconomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham S, Bostock T (2005) Successful fisheries management: issues, case studies, perspectives. Eburon Publishers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLara M, Doyen L (2008) Sustainable management of natural resources: mathematical models and methods. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyen L, DeLara M (2010) Stochastic viability and dynamic programming. Syst Control Lett 59(10): 629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyen L, Martinet V (2012) Maximin, viability and sustainability. J Econ Dyn Control 36(9):1414–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyen L, Pereau J-C (2012) Sustainable coalitions in the commons. Math Soc Sci 63:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyen L, Thébaud O, Martinet V, Gourguet S, Béné C, Bertignac M, Fifas S, Blanchard F (2012) Stochastic viability to ecosystem-based management of multi-species fisheries. Ecol Econ 75:3242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO technical guidelines for responsible fisheries 4, Suppl 2. FAO, Rome, 112 pp

  • Gourguet S, Macher C, Doyen L, Guyader O, Thébaud O (2013) Bio-economic modeling for the viable management of mixed fisheries. Fish Res 140:46–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470:386–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy P-Y, Doyen L, Béné C, Schwartz AM (2013) Food security-environment conservation nexus: a case study of Solomon Islands’ small-scale fisheries. Environ Dev. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464513000584

  • Heal G (1998) Valuing the future, economic theory and sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York

  • Larkin SL, Alvarez S, Sylvia G, Harte M (2011) Practical considerations in using bioeconomic modelling for rebuilding fisheries. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers

  • Loreau M et al (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294(5543):804–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S (2004) The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication. Ecol Soc 9(2):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Morris WF, Doak DF (2003) Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouysset L, Doyen L, Jiguet F (2012) Different policy scenarios to promote various facets of biodiversity. Ecol Indic 14:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouysset L, Doyen L, Jiguet F (2013) Economic risk aversion to promote biodiversity. Ecol Appl 23:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouysset L, Doyen L, Jiguet F, Allaire G, Leger F (2011) Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity and agriculture. Ecol Econ 70(4):617–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereau J-C, Doyen L, Little R, Thebaud O (2012) The triple bottom line: meeting ecological, economic and social goals with Individual Transferable Quotas. J Environ Econ Manag. 63:419–434. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer MB (1954) Some aspects of the dynamics of population important to the managment of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull Int Am Trop Tuna Comm 1(2):2656

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson TM (1994) The economics of extinction revisited and revised: a generalized framework for the analysis of the problems of endangered species and biodiversity losses. Oxford Economic Papers New Series, vol 46. Special Issue on Environmental, Economics, pp 800–821

  • Thébaud O, Smith T, Doyen L, Planque B, Lample M, Mahevas S, Quaas M, Mullon C, Vermard Y, Innes J (2013) Building ecological-economic models and scenarios of marine resource systems: workshop report. Marine Policy. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.05.010

  • Worm B et al (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325(5940):578–585

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out with the financial support of the ANR (French National Research Agency) through the ADHOC and FARMBIRD programs. The support from IHP (Institut Henri Poincaré) in Paris during the trimester “mathematics of bio-economics” in the framework of Mathematics of Planet Earth 2013 initiative was important.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Doyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doyen, L., Cissé, A., Gourguet, S. et al. Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable management of biodiversity. Comput Manag Sci 10, 353–364 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-013-0194-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-013-0194-2

Keywords

Navigation