Abstract
In the era of value-based healthcare, many aspects of medical care are being measured and assessed to improve quality and reduce costs. Radiology adds enormously to health care costs and is under pressure to adopt a more efficient system that incorporates essential metrics to assess its value and impact on outcomes. Most current systems tie radiologists’ incentives and evaluations to RVU-based productivity metrics and peer-review-based quality metrics. In a new potential model, a radiologist’s performance will have to increasingly depend on a number of parameters that define “value,” beginning with peer review metrics that include referrer satisfaction and feedback from radiologists to the referring physician that evaluates the potency and validity of clinical information provided for a given study. These new dimensions of value measurement will directly impact the cascade of further medical management. We share our continued experience with this project that had two components: RESP (Referrer Evaluation System Pilot) and FRACI (Feedback from Radiologist Addressing Confounding Issues), which were introduced to the clinical radiology workflow in order to capture referrer-based and radiologist-based feedback on radiology reporting. We also share our insight into the principles of design thinking as applied in its planning and execution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Golnari P, Forsberg D, Rosipko B, Sunshine J: Online error reporting for managing quality control within radiology. J Digit Imaging DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9820-6,2015
Scott J, Palmer E: Radiology reports: a quantifiable and objective textual approach. Clinical Radiology 70:1185-e1191,2015.
Georgiou A, Hordern A, Dimigen M, et al.: Effective notification of important non-urgent radiology results: a qualitative study of challenges and potential solutions. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 58: Issue 3, 291–297,2014.
Gunn A, Mangano M, Choy G, Sahani D: Rethinking the role of the radiologist: enhancing visibility through both traditional and nontraditional reporting practices. RadioGraphics 35:416–423,2015.
Gunn A, Alabre C, Bennett S, Kautzky M, Krakower T, Palamara T, Choy G: Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting. AJR 201:853–857,2013.
Rubin DL: Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21(4): 355–362,2008.
Gunn AJ, Sahani DV, Bennett SE, Choy G: Recent measures to improve radiology reporting: perspectives from primary care physicians. J Am Coll Radiol. 10(2):122–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.08.013,2013.
Gunn AJ, Mangano MD, Pugmire BS, Sahani DV, Binder WD, et al.: Toward improved radiology reporting practices in the emergency department: a survey of emergency department physicians. J Radiol Radiat Ther 1(2): 1013,2013.
Johnson AJ, Ying J, Littenberg B: Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target. Journal of the American College of Radiology Volume 1: 7, 497–505,2004.
Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH: Radiology reporting: a general perspective. Br J Radiol 83(985):17–22. doi: 10.1259/bjr/16360063,2010.
Obara P, Sevenster M, Chang P, et al.: Evaluating the referring physician’s clinical history and indication as a means for communicating chronic conditions that are pertinent at the point of radiologic interpretation. Journal of Digital Imaging Volume 28 Issue 3: pp 272–282,2015.
Cohen M, Alam K: Radiology clinical synopsis: a simple solution for obtaining an adequate clinical history for the accurate reporting of imaging studies on patients in intensive care units. Pediatr Radiol 35: 918–922,2005.
AG Perreira et al.: Solutions in radiology services management: a literature review. Radiol Bras vol.48 no.5 São Paulo,2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaikh, F., Hendrata, K., Kolowitz, B. et al. Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System—a Design Thinking-Based Approach. J Digit Imaging 30, 267–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9940-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9940-7