Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Workflow Lexicons in Healthcare: Validation of the SWIM Lexicon

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For clinical departments seeking to successfully navigate the challenges of modern health reform, obtaining access to operational and clinical data to establish and sustain goals for improving quality is essential. More broadly, health delivery organizations are also seeking to understand performance across multiple facilities and often across multiple electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Interpreting operational data across multiple vendor systems can be challenging, as various manufacturers may describe different departmental workflow steps in different ways and sometimes even within a single vendor’s installed customer base. In 2012, The Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) recognized the need for better quality and performance data standards and formed SIIM’s Workflow Initiative for Medicine (SWIM), an initiative designed to consistently describe workflow steps in radiology departments as well as defining operational quality metrics. The SWIM lexicon was published as a working model to describe operational workflow steps and quality measures. We measured the prevalence of the SWIM lexicon workflow steps in both academic and community radiology environments using real-world patient observations and correlated that information with automatically captured workflow steps from our clinical information systems. Our goal was to measure frequency of occurrence of workflow steps identified by the SWIM lexicon in a real-world clinical setting, as well as to correlate how accurately departmental information systems captured patient flow through our health facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andriole KP, Morin RL. Transforming medical imaging: the first SCAR TRIPconference a position paper from the SCAR TRIP subcommittee of the SCAR research and development committee. J Digit Imaging 2006 Mar;19(1):6–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriole KP, Morin RL, Arenson RL, Carrino JA, Erickson BJ, Horii SC, Piraino DW, Reiner BI, Seibert JA, Siegel E; SCAR TRIP Subcommittee; TRIP Subcommittee. Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative. J Digit Imaging 2004 Dec;17(4):235–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Andriole KP, Wolfe JM, Khorasani R, Treves ST, Getty DJ, Jacobson FL, Steigner ML, Pan JJ, Sitek A, Seltzer SE. Optimizing analysis, visualization, and navigation of large image data sets: one 5000-section CT scan can ruin your whole day. Radiology 2011 May;259(2):346–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson FL, Berlanstein BP, Andriole KP. Paradigms of perception in clinical practice. J Am Coll Radiol 2006 Jun;3(6):441–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996 Apr;166(4):773–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Balleyguier C, Ayadi S, Van Nguyen K, Vanel D, Dromain C, Sigal R. BIRADS classification in mammography. Eur J Radiol 2007 Feb;61(2):192–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 Jun;174(6):1769–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, Rubin DL, Lee CH, Ikeda DM, Mendelson EB, Wilcox PA, Butler PF, D’Orsi CJ. The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol 2009 Dec;6(12):851–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 Jun;13(6):889–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR. Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon, BI- RADS: ultrasound. Semin Roentgenol 2001 Jul;36(3):217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Molleran V, Mahoney MC. The BI-RADS breast magnetic resonance imaging lexicon. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010 May;18(2):171–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Obenauer S, Hermann KP, Grabbe E. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 2005 May;15(5):1027–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertaud V, Lasbleiz J, Mougin F, Burgun A, Duvauferrier R. A unified representation of findings in clinical radiology using the UMLS and DICOM. Int J Med Inform 2008 Sep;77(9):621–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez-Bayó J. IHE profiles applied to regionall PACS Eur J Radiol 2011 May;78(2):250–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hazen R, Van Esbroeck AP, Mongkolwat P, Channin DS. Automatic extraction of concepts to extend RadLex. J Digit Imaging 2011 Feb;24(1):165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn CE Jr, Langlotz CP, Channin DS, Rubin DL. Informatics in radiology: an information model of the DICOM standard. Radiographics 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):295–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kundu S, Itkin M, Gervais DA, Krishnamurthy VN, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Rubin DL, Langlotz CP. The IR Radlex Project: an interventional radiology lexicon--a collaborative project of the Radiological Society of North America and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009 Jul;20(7 Suppl):S275–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Langlotz CP. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1595–7. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2007 Jan- Feb;27(1):62.

  19. Marwede D, Daumke P, Marko K, Lobsien D, Schulz S, Kahn T. [RadLex German version: a radiological lexicon for indexing image and report information]. Rofo 2009 Jan;181(1):38–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marwede D, Schulz T, Kahn T. Indexing thoracic CT reports using a preliminary version of a standardized radiological lexicon (RadLex). J Digit Imaging 2008 Dec;21(4):363–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Opulencia P, Channin DS, Raicu DS, Furst JD. Mapping LIDC, RadLexTM, and lung nodule image features. J Digit Imaging 2011 Apr;24(2):256–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shore MW, Rubin DL, Kahn CE Jr. Integration of Imaging Signs into RadLex. J Digit Imaging 2011 Apr 15.

  23. Baorto D, Li L, Cimino JJ. Practical experience with the maintenance and auditing of a large medical ontology. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Jun;42(3):494–503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Deserno TM, Antani S, Long R. Ontology of gaps in content-based image retrieval. J Digit Imaging 2009 Apr;22(2):202–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Do BH, Wu A, Biswal S, Kamaya A, Rubin DL. Informatics in radiology: RADTF: a semantic search-enabled, natural language processor-generated radiology teaching file. Radiographics 2010 Nov;30(7):2039–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. do Amaral MB, Roberts A, Rector AL. NLP techniques associated with the OpenGALEN ontology for semi-automatic textual extraction of medical knowledge: abstracting and mapping equivalent linguistic and logical constructs. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:76–80.

  27. Erdal S, Catalyurek UV, Payne PR, Saltz J, Kamal J, Gurcan MN Aknowledge-anchored integrative image search and retrieval system. J Digit Imaging 2009 Apr;22(2):166–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fielding JM, Marwede D. Four ontological models for radiological diagnostics. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006;124:761–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahn CE Jr, Channin DS, Rubin DL. An ontology for PACS integration. J Digit Imaging 2006 Dec;19(4):316–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kahn CE Jr. An Internet-based ontology editor for medical appropriateness criteria. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1998 Apr;56(1):31–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu K, Chapman WW, Savova G, Chute CG, Sioutos N, Crowley RS. Effectiveness of Lexico-syntactic Pattern Matching for Ontology Enrichment with Clinical Documents. Methods Inf Med. 2010 Nov 8;49(6).

  32. Marwede D, Fielding M. The epistemological-ontological divide in clinical radiology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005;116:749–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marwede D, Fielding M, Kahn T. RadiO: a prototype application ontology for radiology reporting tasks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007 Oct 11:513–7.

  34. Mejino JL, Rubin DL, Brinkley JF. FMA-RadLex: An application ontology of radiological anatomy derived from the foundational model of anatomy reference ontology. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 Nov 6:465–9.

  35. Nakai T, Bagarinao E, Tanaka Y, Matsuo K, Racoceanu D. Ontology for FMRI as a biomedical informatics method. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008;7(3):141–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nishimoto N, Yagahara A, Yokooka Y, Tsuji S, Uesugi M, Ogasawara K, Maezawa M. Quantitative analysis of ontology research articles in the radiologic domain. Radiol Phys Technol 2010 Jul;3(2):171–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rubin DL, Dameron O, Bashir Y, Grossman D, Dev P, Musen MA. Using ontologies linked with geometric models to reason about penetrating injuries. Artif Intell Med 2006 Jul;37(3):167–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rubin DL, Flanders A, Kim W, Siddiqui KM, Kahn CE Jr. Ontology-assisted analysis of Web queries to determine the knowledge radiologists seek. J Digit Imaging 2011 Feb;24(1):160–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rubin DL, Noy NF, Musen MA. Protégé: a tool for managing and using terminology in radiology applications. J Digit Imaging 2007 Nov;20 Suppl 1:34–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubin DL, Talos IF, Halle M, Musen MA, Kikinis R. Computational neuroanatomy: ontology-based representation of neural components and connectivity. BMC Bioinformatics 2009 Feb 5;10 Suppl 2:S3

  41. Rubin DL. Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 2008 Dec;21(4):355–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Soysal E, Cicekli I, Baykal N. Design and evaluation of an ontology based information extraction system for radiological reports. Comput Biol Med 2010 Nov-Dec;40(11–12):900–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wennerberg P, Möller M, Buitelaar P, Zillner S. Ontology based clinical query extraction. Summit on Translat Bioinforma. 2009 Mar 1.

  44. Wennerberg P, Schulz K, Buitelaar P. Ontology modularization to improve semantic medical image annotation. J Biomed Inform 2011 Feb;44(1):155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Benjamin M, Aradi Y, Shreiber R. From shared data to sharing workflow: merging PACS and teleradiology. Eur J Radiol 2010 Jan;73(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brenner S, Zeng Z, Liu Y, Wang J, Li J, Howard PK. Modeling and analysis of the emergency department at University of Kentucky Chandler Hospital using simulations. J Emerg Nurs 2010 Jul;36(4):303–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brett A, Miller CG, Hayes CW, Krasnow J, Ozanian T, Abrams K, Block JE, van Kuijk C. Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: accuracy and precision evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Faasse T, Shreve P. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography patient management and workflow. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008 Aug;29(4):277–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fan SF, Yi Z, Xu Z, Ding JR, Zhu HY, Huang JB, Teng GJ. Clinic application of Epub of medical imaging film in CT workflow. Eur J Radiol 2011 Feb 5.

  50. Feng Z, Zeng X. Design and analysis of the optimization of the hospital exam planning and scheduling model. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 2011 Mar;35(2):113–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hagland M. Hearts and minds. When it comes to automating workflow and image management for cardiology, CIOs are finding radiology was a piece of cake. Healthc Inform 2008 Oct;25(10):38–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Esquivel A, Singh S, Singh H. Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011 Apr 12;11:22.

  53. Korman LY, Delvaux M, Bidgood D. Structured reporting in gastrointestinal endoscopy: integration with DICOM and minimal standard terminology. Int J Med Inform 1998 Feb;48(1–3):201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kubik-Huch RA, Klaghofer R, Römpler M, Weber A, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Workplace experience of radiographers: impact of structural and interpersonal interventions. Eur Radiol 2010 Feb;20(2):377–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kuzmiak CM, Cole E, Zeng D, Kim E, Koomen M, Lee Y, Pavic D, Pisano ED. Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol 2010 Sep;17(9):1168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lahiri A, Seidmann A. Analyzing the differential impact of radiology information systems across radiology modalities. J Am Coll Radiol 2009 Oct;6(10):705–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lin A, Harris M, Zalis M. Initial observations of electronic medical record usage during CT and MRI interpretation: Frequency of use and impact on workflow. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 Jul;195(1):188–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Morgan MB, Branstetter BF 4th, Clark C, House J, Baker D, Harnsberger HR. Just-in-Time Radiologist Decision Support: The Importance of PACS-Integrated Workflow. J Am Coll Radiol 2011 Jul;8(7):497–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pennathur PR, Cao D, Sui Z, Lin L, Bisantz AM, Fairbanks RJ, Guarrera TK, Brown JL, Perry SJ, Wears RL. Development of a simulation environment to study emergency department information technology. Simul Healthc 2010 Apr;5(2):103–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Reiner B. Automating radiologist workflow part 1: the digital consultation. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 Oct. 5(10):1080–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Reiner B. Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 Nov;5(11):1137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Reiner B. Automating radiologist workflow, part 3: education and training. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 Dec;5(12):1191–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Langer SG DICOM Data Warehouse: Part 2. J Digit Imaging 2016 Jun;29(3):309–13. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9830-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Roth CJ, Boll DT, Chea YW, Wall LK, Merkle EM. Implementation of graphic user interface screen capture solution for workflow assessment of abdominal MR examinations valuable tool to analyze discrepancies in expected and experienced MR table time. Acad Radiol 2009 Oct;16(10):1286–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sanguinetti K. Implementing volume ultrasound workflow. Radiol Manage 2008 30(6):54–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Shah NA, Hoch M, Willis A, Betts B, Patel HK, Hershey BL. Correlation among on-call resident study volume, discrepancy rate, and turnaround time. Acad Radiol 2010 Sep;17(9):1190–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Towbin AJ, Hall S, Moskovitz J, Johnson ND, Donnelly LF. Creating a comprehensive customer service program to help convey critical and acute results of radiology studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011 Jan;196(1):W48–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. von Schulthess GK, Burger C. Integrating imaging modalities: what makes sense from a workflow perspective? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010 May;37(5):980–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wang C, Smedby O. Integrating automatic and interactive methods for coronary artery segmentation: let the PACS workstation think ahead. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010 May;5(3):275–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Welter P, Hocken C, Deserno TM, Grouls C, Günther RW. Workflow management of content-based image retrieval for CAD support in PACS environments based on IHE. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010 Jul;5(4):393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang J, Lu X, Nie H, Huang Z, van der Aalst WM. Radiology information system: a workflow-based approach. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2009 Sep;4(5):509–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Boo S, Hogg JP. How’s your disk? Illustrative glossary of degenerative disk lesions using standardized lexicon. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010 May-Jun;39(3):118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dreyer KJ, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Hurier AM, Asfaw BA, Schultz T, Halpern EF, Thrall JH. Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study. Radiology 2005 Feb;234(2):323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Dunnick NR, Langlotz CP. The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 May;5(5):626–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hagland M. The key to image management. While PACS often takes center stage in imaging discussions, a renewed focus on workflow and accessibility is putting RIS in the spotlight. Healthc Inform 2009 Oct;26(10):32, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Langlotz CP, Caldwell SA. The completeness of existing lexicons for representing radiology report information. J Digit Imaging 2002;15 Suppl 1:201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Langlotz CP. Enhancing the expressiveness of structured reporting systems. J Digit Imaging 2000 May;13(2 Suppl 1):49–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Levy MA, Rubin DL. Tool support to enable evaluation of the clinical response to treatment. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 Nov 6:399–403.

  79. Reiner BI, Knight N, Siegel EL. Radiology reporting, past, present, and future: the radiologist’s perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 2007 May;4(5):313–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Reiner BI. The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 2009 Dec;22(6):562–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Gregg WB Jr, Randolph M, Brown DH, Lyles T, Smith SD, D’Agostino H. Using PACS audit data for process improvement. J Digit Imaging 2010 Dec;23(6):674–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hagland M. The future of imaging, part II. IT leaders discuss the need to create “meta-level” software as imaging management moves outside radiology. Healthc Inform 2009 Jan;25(13):33–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Lu L, Li J, Gisler P. Improving financial performance by modeling and analysis of radiology procedure scheduling at a large community hospital. J Med Syst 2011 Jun;35(3):299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Mollura DJ, Carrino JA, Matuszak DL, Mnatsakanyan ZR, Eng J, Cutchis P, Babin SM, Sniegoski C, Lombardo JS. Bridging radiology and public health: the emerging field of radiologic public health informatics. J Am Coll Radiol 2008 Mar;5(3):174–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Robinson TJ, DuVall S, Wiggins R 3rd. Creation and usability testing of a web-based pre- scanning radiology patient safety and history questionnaire set. J Digit Imaging 2009 Dec;22(6):641–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sunshine JH, Hughes DR, Meghea C, Bhargavan M. What factors affect the productivity and efficiency of physician practices? Med Care 2010 Feb;48(2):110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. SWIM Initative – Accessed 5/2/2016 at https://siim.org/?page=swim&hhSearchTerms=%22SWIM%22

  88. RADLEX – Accessed 5/2/2016 at http://www.rsna.org/RadLex.aspx

  89. SOLE – Accessed 5/2/2016 at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Standardized_Operational_Log_of_Events_(SOLE)

  90. SIIM Hackathon event Accessed 7/2/2016 at https://siim.org/page/hacking_healthcare

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Chris Meenan, Jewel Fossett, Elizabeth Olsen & Joseph Chen

  2. Mayo Clinic Radiology, Rochester, MN, USA

    Bradley Erickson & Steve G. Langer

  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Nancy Knight

  4. University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Prerna Mohod

Authors
  1. Chris Meenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bradley Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jewel Fossett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elizabeth Olsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Prerna Mohod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Joseph Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Steve G. Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve G. Langer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meenan, C., Erickson, B., Knight, N. et al. Workflow Lexicons in Healthcare: Validation of the SWIM Lexicon. J Digit Imaging 30, 255–266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9935-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9935-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation