Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We catalogue available software solutions for non-rigid image registration to support scientists in selecting suitable tools for specific medical registration purposes. Registration tools were identified using non-systematic search in Pubmed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore® Digital Library, Google Scholar, and through references in identified sources (n = 22). Exclusions are due to unavailability or inappropriateness. The remaining (n = 18) tools were classified by (i) access and technology, (ii) interfaces and application, (iii) living community, (iv) supported file formats, and (v) types of registration methodologies emphasizing the similarity measures implemented. Out of the 18 tools, (i) 12 are open source, 8 are released under a permissive free license, which imposes the least restrictions on the use and further development of the tool, 8 provide graphical processing unit (GPU) support; (ii) 7 are built on software platforms, 5 were developed for brain image registration; (iii) 6 are under active development but only 3 have had their last update in 2015 or 2016; (iv) 16 support the Analyze format, while 7 file formats can be read with only one of the tools; and (v) 6 provide multiple registration methods and 6 provide landmark-based registration methods. Based on open source, licensing, GPU support, active community, several file formats, algorithms, and similarity measures, the tools Elastics and Plastimatch are chosen for the platform ITK and without platform requirements, respectively. Researchers in medical image analysis already have a large choice of registration tools freely available. However, the most recently published algorithms may not be included in the tools, yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gering DT, Nabavi A, Kikinis R, et al: An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:967–975, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann T, Gröndahl H, Benn D: Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Rad 29:323–346, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elhawary H, Oguro S, Tuncali K, et al: Multimodality non-rigid image registration for planning, targeting and monitoring during CT-guided percutaneous liver tumor cryoablation. Acad Radiol 17:1334–1344, 2010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang X, Ren J, Guiraudon G, Boughner D, Peters TM: Rapid dynamic image registration of the beating heart for diagnosis and surgical navigation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:1802–1814, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wein W, Brunke S, Khamene A, Callstrom MR, Navab N: Automatic CT-ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention. Med Image Anal 12:577–585, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganser KA, Dickhaus H, Metzner R, Wirtz CR: A deformable digital brain atlas system according to Talairach and Tournoux. Med Image Anal 8:3–22, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu C, Murtha P, Jaramaz B: Femur statistical atlas construction based on two-level 3D non-rigid registration. Comput Aided Surg 14:83–99, 2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen K, Heldmann S, Rühaak J, Hallmann M: Construction of Average STN Atlas using Image Registration and Reconstruction. Available at https://www.mic.uni-luebeck.de/uploads/tx_wapublications/paper_01.pdf. Accessed 06/03/2015.

  9. Foskey M, Davis B, Goyal L, et al: Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 50:5869–5892, 2005

  10. Dornheim L, Tönnies KD, Dixon K: Automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in 3D SPECT data by registration with a dynamic anatomic model in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2005. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, pp 335–342

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Grosland NM, Bafna R, Magnotta VA: Automated hexahedral meshing of anatomic structures using deformable registration. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12:35–43, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ: Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46:R1–R45, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maintz J, Viergever MA: A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 2:1–36, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slomka PJ, Baum RP: Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:44–55, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van den Elsen PA, Pol E-JD, Viergever MA: Medical image matching-a review with classification. IEEE Eng Med Biol 12:26–39, 1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira FP, Tavares JMR: Medical image registration: a review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17:73–93, 2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Penney GP, Weese J, Little JA, Desmedt P, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ: A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17:586–595, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sotiras A, Davatzikos C, Paragios N: Deformable medical image registration: A survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32:1153–1190, 2013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Holden M: A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:111–128, 2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Makela T, Clarysse P, Sipila O, et al: A review of cardiac image registration methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:1011–1021, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gholipour A, Kehtarnavaz N, Briggs R, Devous M, Gopinath K: Brain functional localization: a survey of image registration techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:427–451, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearlman PC, Adams A, Elias SG, Willem PTM, Viergever MA, Pluim JP: Mono-and multimodal registration of optical breast images. J Biomed Opt 17:0809011–08090110, 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao R, Zhang L, Sun Y, Miao S, Chefd’Hotel C: A review of recent advances in registration techniques applied to minimally invasive therapy. IEEE Trans multimedia 15:983–1000, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Piccinelli M, Garcia E: Multimodality image fusion for diagnosing coronary artery disease. J Biomed Res 27:439–451, 2013

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez L, Durdle N, Raso V: Medical image registration in computational intelligence framework: a review. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2003 I.E. CCECE, 2003

  26. Shams R, Sadeghi P, Kennedy RA, Hartley RI: A survey of medical image registration on multicore and the GPU. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 27:50–60, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Damas S, Cordón O, Santamaria J: Medical image registration using evolutionary computation: An experimental survey. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 6:26–42, 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D, LaConte SM: Medical image processing on the GPU--Past, present and future. Med Image Anal 17:1073–1094, 2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fluck O, Vetter C, Wein W, Kamen A, Preim B, Westermann R: A survey of medical image registration on graphics hardware. Comp Meth Prog Bio 104:e45–e57, 2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bankman I: Handbook of medical image processing and analysis. Academic, San Diego, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  31. Deserno TM: Biomedical image processing. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Goshtasby AA: 2-D and 3-D image registration: for medical, remote sensing, and industrial applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hajnal J, Hill D, Hawkes D: Medical image registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Modersitzki J: FAIR: flexible algorithms for image registration Available at http://www.siam.org-books/fa06. Accessed 10/12/2014

  35. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al: 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341, 2012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hawkes DJ: Registration methodology: introduction in Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, New York, 2001, pp p. 11–p. 38

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Zitova B, Flusser J: Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput 21:977–1000, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sotiras A, Ou Y, Glocker B, Davatzikos C, Paragios N: Simultaneous geometric-iconic registration in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2010. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp 676–683

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Rueckert D, Schnabel JA: Medical image registration in Biomedical Image Processing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp 131–154

    Google Scholar 

  40. Christensen GE, Johnson HJ: Consistent image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:568–582, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roche A, Malandain G, Pennec X, Ayache N: The correlation ratio as a new similarity measure for multimodal image registration in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interventation—MICCAI’98. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, pp 1115–1124

    Google Scholar 

  42. Astola J, Virtanen I: Entropy correlation coefficient, a measure of statistical dependence for categorized data. Proc Univ Vaasa Discussion paper 44, 1982

  43. Lo C-H, Don H-S: 3-D moment forms: their construction and application to object identification and positioning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 11:1053–1064, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen D, Davatzikos C: HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:1421–1439, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Glocker B, Komodakis N, Tziritas G, Navab N, Paragios N: Dense image registration through MRFs and efficient linear programming. Med Image Anal 12:731–741, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tustison NJ, Awate SP, Song G, Cook TS, Gee JC: Point Set Registration Using Havrda-Charvat-Tsallis Entropy Measures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30:451–460, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. He Y, Hamza AB, Krim H: A generalized divergence measure for robust image registration. IEEE Trans Signal Proces 51:1211–1220, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:187–198, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hill D, Batchelor PG: Registration methodology: Concepts and algorithms in Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, New York, 2001, pp p. 39–p. 70

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Pluta J, Avants BB, Glynn S, Awate S, Gee JC, Detre JA: Appearance and incomplete label matching for diffeomorphic template based hippocampus segmentation. Hippocampus 19:565–571, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC: Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput Assist Tomo 22:139–152, 1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ardekani BA, Guckemus S, Bachman A, Hoptman MJ, Wojtaszek M, Nierenberg J: Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans. J Neurosci Meth 142:67–76, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alpert NM, Berdichevsky D, Levin Z, Morris ED, Fischman AJ: Improved methods for image registration. Neuroimage 3:10–18, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Schwarz LA: Non-rigid Registration Using Free-form Deformations. Technische Universität München, 2007

  55. Papenberg N, Schumacher H, Heldmann S, et al: A fast and flexible image registration toolbox in Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2007. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp 106–110

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouve A, Younes L: Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int J Comput Vision 61:139–157, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC: A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54:2033–2044, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, et al: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46:786–802, 2009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Murphy K, van Ginneken B, Reinhardt JM, et al: Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30:1901–1920, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Arganda-Carreras I, Sorzano CO, Marabini R, Carazo J: María, Ortiz-de-Solorzano C, Kybic J: Consistent and elastic registration of histological sections using vector-spline regularization in Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sorzano CO, Thevenaz P, Unser M: Elastic registration of biological images using vector-spline regularization. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 52:652–663, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ou Y, Sotiras A, Paragios N, Davatzikos C: DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting. Med Image Anal 15:622–639, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Glocker B, Sotiras A, Komodakis N, Paragios N: Deformable medical image registration: Setting the state of the art with discrete methods. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 13:219–244, 2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP: Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:196–205, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rueckert D: Nonrigid Registration: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications in Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, New York, 2001, pp p. 281–p. 301

    Google Scholar 

  67. Davis MH, Khotanzad A, Flamig DP, Harms SE: Elastic body splines: a physics based approach to coordinate transformation in medical image matching. Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 1995

  68. Andersson J, Jenkinson M, Smith S: Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA2: FMRIB Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2007

  69. Gilles B, Pai DK: Fast musculoskeletal registration based on shape matching in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2008. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp 822–829

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Studholme C, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recogn 32:71–86, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Schnabel JA, Rueckert D, Quist M, et al: A generic framework for non-rigid registration based on non-uniform multi-level free-form deformations in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2001. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, pp 573–581

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Kroon DJ, Slump CH: MRI modalitiy transformation in demon registration. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009

  73. Thirion J-P: Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons. Med Image Anal 2:243–260, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Modat M, Ridgway GR, Taylor ZA, et al: Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Comp Meth Prog Bio 98:278–284, 2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Dru F, Vercauteren T: An ITK implementation of the symmetric log-domain diffeomorphic demons algorithm. The Insight Journal Available at http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00813744/. Accessed 18/11/2014

  76. Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N: Symmetric log-domain diffeomorphic registration: A demons-based approach in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2008. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp 754–761

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Ashburner J: SPM: a history. Neuroimage 62:791–800, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Penny WD, Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nichols TE: Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ashburner J: A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38:95–113, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ: Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 3:165–189, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Shackleford JA, Shusharina N, Verberg J, et al.: Plastimatch 1.6 — Current capabilities and future directions. In Proc. MICCAI 2012 Image-Guidance and Multimodal Dose Planning in Radiation Therapy Workshop, 108–119, 2012

  82. Woods RP, Grafton ST, Watson JD, Sicotte NL, Mazziotta JC: Automated image registration: II Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. J Comput Assist Tomo 22:153–165, 1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Brooks R, Arbel T: Improvements to the itk:: KernelTransform and subclasses. The Insight Journal Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1926/494. Accessed 10/03/2015

  84. Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N: Non-parametric diffeomorphic image registration with the demons algorithm. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention- MICCAI 2007, Pt 2. Proceedings 4792:319–326, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  85. Shen D: Image registration by local histogram matching. Pattern Recogn 40:1161–1172, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement no. 610425.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Informatics, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, D-52057, Aachen, Germany

    András P. Keszei & Thomas M. Deserno

  2. Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science (AICES), RWTH Aachen, Schinkelstrasse 2, Aachen, 52062, Germany

    Benjamin Berkels

Authors
  1. András P. Keszei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Berkels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas M. Deserno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to András P. Keszei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keszei, A.P., Berkels, B. & Deserno, T.M. Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine. J Digit Imaging 30, 102–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9915-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9915-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation