Skip to main content
Log in

Strategies for Medical Data Extraction and Presentation Part 1: Current Limitations and Deficiencies

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data overload is a burgeoning challenge for the medical imaging community; with resulting technical, clinical, and economic ramifications. A primary concern for radiologists is the timely, efficient, and accurate extraction of imaging and clinical data, which collectively are essential in determining accurate diagnosis. In current practice, imaging data retrieval is limited by the fact that imaging and report data are de-coupled from one another, along with the non-standardized and often ambiguous free text data contained within narrative radiology reports. Clinical data retrieval is equally challenging and flawed by the lack of information system integration, paucity of clinical order entry data, and diminished role of the technologist in providing clinical data. These combined factors have the potential to adversely affect radiologist performance and clinical outcomes by diminishing workflow, report accuracy, and diagnostic confidence. New and innovative strategies are required to improve and automate data extraction and presentation, in a context- and user-specific fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reiner BI, Krupinski E: The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice. J Digit Imaging 25:3–6, 2012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E: Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11:104–112, 2004

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demner-Fushman D, Chapman WW, McDonald CJ: What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? J Biomed Inform 42:760–772, 2009

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiner B: Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining. J Digit Imaging 109–118, 2010

  5. Reiner BI, McKinley M: Innovation economics and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 3:325–329, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schreiber MH: The clinical history as a factor in the roentgenogram interpretation. JAMA 185:399–401, 1963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loy CT, Irwig L: Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. JAMA 292:1602–1609, 2004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berbaum KS, Franken Jr, EA, Dorfmann DD, et al: Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 21:532–539, 1986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al: CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal 1. Radiology 236:3–9, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B, et al: Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:864–871, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grenier P, Chevret S, Beigelman C, et al: Chronic diffuse infiltrative lung disease: determination of the diagnostic value of clinical data, chest radiography, and CT on Bayesian analysis. Radiology 191:383–390, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhianpour M, Janghorbani M: Effect of clinical information on brain CT scan interpretation: a blinded double crossover study. MJIRI 17:173–177, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leslie A, Jones AJ, Goddard PR: The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. Br J Radiol 73:1052–1055, 2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McNeil BJ, Hanley JA, Funkenstein HH, et al: Paired received operating characteristic curves and the effect of history on radiographic interpretation: CT of the head as a case study. Radiology 149:75–77, 1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons M, Parker JA, Donohoe KJ, et al: The impact of clinical data on interpretation of thallium scintigrams. J Nucl Cardiol 1:365–371, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berbaum KS, Franken Jr, EA, El-Khoury GY: Impact of clinical history on radiographic detection of fractures: a comparison of radiologists and orthopedists. AJR 153:1221–1224, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Knight N: Radiology reporting: past, present, and future: the radiologist perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 5:313–319, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boonn WW, Langlotz CP: Radiologist use of and perceived need for patient data access. J Digit Imaging 22:357–362, 2009

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Reiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reiner, B. Strategies for Medical Data Extraction and Presentation Part 1: Current Limitations and Deficiencies. J Digit Imaging 28, 123–126 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9769-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9769-5

Keywords

Navigation