Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pectoral Muscle Detection in Mammograms Using Local Statistical Features

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mammography is a primary imaging method for breast cancer diagnosis. It is an important issue to accurately identify and separate pectoral muscles (PM) from breast tissues. Hough-transform-based methods are commonly adopted for PM detection. But their performances are susceptible when PM edges cannot be depicted by straight lines. In this study, we present a new pectoral muscle identification algorithm which utilizes statistical features of pixel responses. First, the Anderson–Darling goodness-of-fit test is used to extract a feature image by assuming non-Gaussianity for PM boundaries. Second, a global weighting scheme based on the location of PM was applied onto the feature image to suppress non-PM regions. From the weighted image, a preliminary set of pectoral muscles boundary components is detected via row-wise peak detection. An iterative procedure based on the edge continuity and orientation is used to determine the final PM boundary. Our results on a public mammogram database were assessed using four performance metrics: the false positive rate, the false negative rate, the Hausdorff distance, and the average distance. Compared to previous studies, our method demonstrates the state-of-art performance in terms of four measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang J, Rangayyan RM, Xu J, Naqa IE, Yang Y: Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13:236–251, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, et al: Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms. Med Phys 37:2289–2299, 2010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu L, Wang J, He K: Breast density classification using histogram moments of multiple resolution mammograms. In: 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2010, pp 146–149

  4. Moayedi F, Azimifar Z, Boostani R, Katebi S: Contourlet-based mammography mass classification using the SVM family. Comput Biol Med 40:373–383, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganesan K, Acharya UR, Chua KC, Min LC, Abraham KT: Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 110:48–57, 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakraborty J, Mukhopadhyay S, Singla V, Khandelwal N, Bhattacharyya P: Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature. J Digit Imaging 25:387–399, 2012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Karssemeijer N: Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys Med Biol 43:365–389, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinoshita S, Azevedo-Marques P, Pereira Jr, R, Rodrigues J, Rangayyan R: Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. J Digit Imaging 21:37–49, 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yam M, et al: Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:479–489, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwok SM, Chandrasekhar R, Attikiouzel Y, Rickard MT: Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:1129–1140, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari R, Rangayyan R, Desautels J, Borges R, Frere A: Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:232–245, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma F, Bajger M, Slavotinek JP, Bottema MJ: Two graph theory based methods for identifying the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Pattern Recogn 40:2592–2602, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Camilus KS, Govindan V, Sathidevi P: Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms. J Digit Imaging 23:562–580, 2010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mustra M, Bozek J, Grgic M: Breast border extraction and pectoral muscle detection using wavelet decomposition. In: EUROCON 2009, 2009, pp 1426–1433

  15. de Carvalho IM, et al: An automatic method for delineating the pectoral muscle in mammograms. In: IV Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering, Bioengineering Solutions for Latin America, Health, 2007, pp 271–275

  16. Iglesias JE, Karssemeijer N: Robust initial detection of landmarks in film-screen mammograms using multiple FFDM atlases. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:1815–1824, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehmann EEL, Romano JP: Testing statistical hypotheses, 3rd edition. Springer, New York, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suckling J et al: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: 2nd international workshop on digital mammography, 1994

  19. Huttenlocher DP, Klanderman GA, Rucklidge WJ: Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. Pattern Anal Mach Int IEEE Trans 15:850–863, 1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, L., Liu, Q. & Lu, W. Pectoral Muscle Detection in Mammograms Using Local Statistical Features. J Digit Imaging 27, 633–641 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9676-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9676-1

Keywords

Navigation