Skip to main content
Log in

Can the Documented Patient Briefing Be Carried Out with an iPad App?

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of an iPad-based documented patient briefing for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations. A standard briefing sheet and questionnaire for a MRI scan was converted from paper form into an iPad application. Twenty patients, who had been referred for an MRI scan, were briefed about the examination in paper form as well as via the iPad application before performing the MRI scan. Time each patient needed for the briefing and the number of questions that came up were documented. Patients’ acceptance of the electronic briefing was assessed using a questionnaire. The mean processing time was 2.36 min (range 0.58 to 09.35 min., standard deviation ±2.05 min) for the paper-based briefing and 4.15 min (range 1.56 to 13.48 min, SD ± 2.36 min) for the app-based briefing. Concerning technical aspects, patients asked two questions during the app-based briefing; no questions arose during the paper-based briefing. Six patients preferred electronic briefing and four patients, the paper-based form. No patient preferred the electronic form with additional multimedial information. Eight participants did not mind which briefing version was used; two participants did not express their preference at all. Our experiences showed that electronic briefing using an iPad is feasible and has the potential to become a user-friendly alternative to the conventional paper-based approach. Owing to the broad range of the results, a follow-up study will seek to determine the influencing factors on processing time and other potential questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsukayama H: Apple’s record iPad sales, in context. The Washington Post. 2012. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/apples-record-ipad-sales-in-context/2012/03/20/gIQAaxDYPS_story.html. Accessed June 17, 2012.

  2. Dolan B: Types of medical apps the FDA will regulate | mobihealthnews. Mobihealthnews. 2011. Available at: http://mobihealthnews.com/11980/types-of-medical-apps-the-fda-will-regulate/. Accessed August 4, 2012.

  3. Dolan B: How FDA and FTC co-regulate health apps | mobihealthnews. Mobihealthnews. 2012. Available at: http://mobihealthnews.com/16729/how-fda-and-ftc-co-regulate-health-apps/. Accessed August 4, 2012.

  4. Health C for D and R. Products and Medical Procedures - Mobile Medical Applications. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ucm255978.htm. Accessed August 4, 2012.

  5. Mc Laughlin P, Neill SO, Fanning N, et al: Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad. Emerg Radiol 19(2):127–133, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. John S, Poh ACC, Lim TCC, Chan EHY, Chong LR: The iPad Tablet Computer for Mobile On-Call Radiology Diagnosis? Auditing Discrepancy in CT and MRI Reporting. Journal of digital imaging: the official journal of the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology. 2012. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562174. Accessed May 30, 2012.

  7. Sadri A, Murphy AD, Odili J: iPad local flap pre-operative planning: A good training tool. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 2012. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22578789. Accessed May 30, 2012.

  8. Richardson ML, Petscavage JM, Hunter JC, Roberts CC, Martin TP: Running an Online Radiology Teaching Conference: Why It’s a Great Idea and How to Do It Successfully. Acad Radiol 19(6):746–751, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Philippe F, Meney M, Larrazet F, et al: Effects of video information in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 99(2):95–101, 2006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beamond BM, Beischer AD, Brodsky JW, Leslie H: Improvement in surgical consent with a preoperative multimedia patient education tool: a pilot study. Foot Ankle Int 30(7):619–626, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mulsow JJW, Feeley TM, Tierney S: Beyond consent–improving understanding in surgical patients. Am. J. Surg 203(1):112–120, 2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlechtweg PM, Kuefner MA, Heberlein C, et al: A useful tool for routine radiological examinations: the iPhone application “KM Helper”. Radiologe 51(5):392–396, 2011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eggers C, Obliers R, Koerfer A, et al: A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15(11):2866–2873, 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Martin Schlechtweg.

Additional information

Philipp Martin Schlechtweg and Matthias Hammon contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlechtweg, P.M., Hammon, M., Heberlein, C. et al. Can the Documented Patient Briefing Be Carried Out with an iPad App?. J Digit Imaging 26, 383–392 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9560-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9560-9

Keywords

Navigation