Skip to main content
Log in

Workflow Continuity—Moving Beyond Business Continuity in a Multisite 24–7 Healthcare Organization

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As hospitals move towards providing in-house 24 × 7 services, there is an increasing need for information systems to be available around the clock. This study investigates one organization’s need for a workflow continuity solution that provides around the clock availability for information systems that do not provide highly available services. The organization investigated is a large multifacility healthcare organization that consists of 20 hospitals and more than 30 imaging centers. A case analysis approach was used to investigate the organization’s efforts. The results show an overall reduction in downtimes where radiologists could not continue their normal workflow on the integrated Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) solution by 94 % from 2008 to 2011. The impact of unplanned downtimes was reduced by 72 % while the impact of planned downtimes was reduced by 99.66 % over the same period. Additionally more than 98 h of radiologist impact due to a PACS upgrade in 2008 was entirely eliminated in 2011 utilizing the system created by the workflow continuity approach. Workflow continuity differs from high availability and business continuity in its design process and available services. Workflow continuity only ensures that critical workflows are available when the production system is unavailable due to scheduled or unscheduled downtimes. Workflow continuity works in conjunction with business continuity and highly available system designs. The results of this investigation revealed that this approach can add significant value to organizations because impact on users is minimized if not eliminated entirely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, HR 1, 111th Cong., 1st sess, 2009

  2. Lam W: Ensuring business continuity. IT Prof 4(3):19–25, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lampson B: How to build a highly available system using consensus. Distributed Algorithms, 1151:1–17, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi V, Lee K, Melson D, and Narra V: Empirical investigation of radiologists’ prioritiesfor PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach. J Digit Imaging 24:700–708, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khorasani R: Business continuity and disaster recovery: PACS as a case example. J Am Coll Radiol 5(2):144–145, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerullo V, Cerullo MJ: Business continuity planning: a comprehensive approach. Inf Syst Manag 21(3):70–78, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keene S, Auger L: Continuity of business: does your hospital have a plan. Internet J World Health Societal Polit 4(2), 2007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Kolowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolowitz, B.J., Lauro, G.R., Barkey, C. et al. Workflow Continuity—Moving Beyond Business Continuity in a Multisite 24–7 Healthcare Organization. J Digit Imaging 25, 744–750 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9504-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9504-4

Keywords

Navigation