Résumé
Le traitement endoscopique par endoprothèse colique d’une occlusion colique liée à un cancer colorectal doit s’intégrer dans la stratégie thérapeutique globale de prise en charge du cancer. En situation curative, l’endoprothèse en pont avant la chirurgie ne peut pas être recommandée en première intention, et le traitement chirurgical de l’occlusion est à privilégier. Elle est une alternative thérapeutique dans les centres experts. En situation palliative, l’endoprothèse peut être recommandée en première intention. Elle réduit le recours à la stomie, la durée d’hospitalisation, la morbimortalité et le délai de début d’une chimiothérapie. Dans cette situation, la chirurgie est une autre option thérapeutique. Chez les patients avec une endoprothèse colique, l’utilisation d’un traitement antiangiogénique expose à un risque élevé de perforation.
Abstract
Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent placement is a minimally invasive option for achieving acute colonic decompression in obstructed colorectal cancer. Decisions about stent placement for obstructive colorectal cancer must consider the prognosis of the cancer and possible therapeutic strategy following the resolution of obstruction. In curative intent, stenting cannot be recommended as first-line intervention and the surgical treatment of occlusion is preferred. In the context of palliative intent, stenting can be recommended as a first-line intervention and surgery is an option. Treatment with a colonic stent reduces the rate of stoma, the duration of hospital stay, and morbidity and mortality; and permits rapid initiation of chemotherapy. Given the increased risk of colonic perforation, the anti-angiogenic treatment is not recommended in patients with a colonic stent.
Références
Menegoz F, Black RJ, Arveux P, et al. (1997) Cancer incidence and mortality in France. Eur J Cancer Prev 6: 442–66
Iversen LH, Bülow S, Christensen IJ, et al. (2008) Postoperative medical complications are the main cause of early death after emergency surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 95: 1012–9
Carraro PG, Segala M, Cesana BM, et al. (2001) Obstructing colonic cancer: failure and survival patterns over a ten-year follow-up after one-stage curative surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 243–50
Dohmoto M (1991) New method: endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Dig 3: 1507–12
Brehant O, Fuks D, Bartoli E, et al. (2009) Elective (planned) colectomy in patients with colorectal obstruction after placement of a self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery: the results of a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 11: 178–83
Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Gruenberger T, et al. (2009) Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel. Ann Oncol 20: 985–92
Baron TH (2001) Expandable metal stents for the treatment of cancerous obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. N Engl J Med 344: 1681–7
Small AJ, Coelho-Prabhu N, Baron TH (2010) Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction: long-term outcomes and complication factors. Gastrointest Endosc 71: 560–72
ASGE Technology Committee, Varadarajulu S, Banerjee S, et al. (2011) Enteral stents. Gastrointest Endosc 74: 455–64
Sebastian S, Johnston S, Geoghegan T, et al. (2004) Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 2051–7
Khot UP, Lang AW, Murali K, et al. (2002) Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stents. Br J Surg 89: 1096–102
Watt AM, Faragher IG, Griffin TT, et al. (2007) Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving colorectal malignant obstruction: a systematic review. Ann Surg 246: 24–30
Meisner S, Gonzalez-Huix F, Vandervoort JG, et al. (2011) Self-expandable metal stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: short-term safety and efficacy within 30 days of stent procedure in 447 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 74: 876–84
Alcantara M, Serra-Aracil X, Falco J, et al. (2011) Prospective, controlled, randomized study of intraoperative colonic lavage versus stent placement in obstructive left-sided colonic cancer. World J Surg 35: 1904–10
Cheung HY, Chung CC, Tsang WW, et al. (2009) Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144: 1127–32
Pirlet IA, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F, et al. (2011) Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25: 1814–21
van Hooft JE, Bemelman WA, Oldenburg B, et al. (2011) Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12: 344–52
van Hooft JE, Fockens P, Marinelli AW, et al. (2008) Earlyclosure of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgery for stage IV left-sided colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 40: 184–91
Fiori E, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, et al. (2012) Palliative management for patients with subacute obstruction and stage IV unresectable rectosigmoid cancer: colostomy versus endoscopic stenting: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Surg 204: 321–6
De Ceglie A, Filiberti R, Baron TH, et al. (2013) A meta-analysis of endoscopic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88: 387–403
Cennamo V, Luigiano C, Coccolini F, et al. (2013) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical decompression for colorectal cancer obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 28: 855–63
Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 99: 469–76
Sabbagh C, Browet F, Diouf M, et al. (2013) Is Stenting as “a Bridge to Surgery” an Oncologically Safe Strategy for the Management of Acute, Left-Sided, Malignant, Colonic Obstruction? A Comparative Study with a Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg 258: 107–15
Saida Y, Sumiyama Y, Nagao J, et al. (2003) Long-term prognosis of preoperative “bridge to surgery” expandable metallic stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer: comparison with emergency operation. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 44–9
Dastur JK, Forshaw MJ, Modarai B, et al. (2008) Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes following either insertion of self-expanding metallic stents or emergency surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction. Tech Coloproctol 12: 51–5
Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. (2013) Higher rate of perineural invasion in stent-laparoscopic approach in comparison to emergent open resection for obstructing left-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 28: 407–14
Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, et al. (2009) Oncologic outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent insertion as a bridge to surgery in the management of left-sided colon cancer obstruction: comparison with non-obstructing elective surgery. World J Surg 33: 1281–6
Kim HJ, Huh JW, Kang WS, et al. (2013) Oncologic safety of stent as bridge to surgery compared to emergency radical surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Surg Endosc 27: 3121–8
Maruthachalam K, Lash GE, Shenton BK, Horgan AF (2007) Tumour cell dissemination following endoscopic stent insertion. Br J Surg 94: 1151–4
Vemulapalli R, Lara LF, Sreenarasimhaiah J, et al. (2010) A comparison of palliative stenting or emergent surgery for obstructing incurable colon cancer. Dig Dis Sci 55: 1732–7
Carne PW, Frye JN, Robertson GM, et al. (2004) Stents or open operation for palliation of colorectal cancer: a retrospective, cohort study of perioperative outcome and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1455–61
Karoui M, Charachon A, Delbaldo C, et al. (2007) Stents for palliation of obstructive metastatic colon cancer: impact on management and chemotherapy administration. Arch Surg 142: 619–23
Lee WS, Baek JH, Kang JM, et al. (2012) The outcome after stent placement or surgery as the initial treatment for obstructive primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer. Am J Surg 203: 715–9
Yoon JY, Jung YS, Hong SP, et al. (2011) Clinical outcomes and risk factors for technical and clinical failures of self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 74: 858–68
Kim BC, Han KS, Hong CW, et al. (2012) Clinical outcomes of palliative self-expanding metallic stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. J Dig Dis 13: 258–66
Fernandez-Esparrach G, Bordas JM, Giraldez MD, et al. (2010) Severe complications limit long-term clinical success of self-expanding metal stents in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 105: 1087–93
Ranpura V, Hapani S, Wu S (2011) Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA 305: 487–94
Hapani S, Chu D, Wu S (2009) Risk of gastrointestinal perforation in patients with cancer treated with bevacizumab: a metaanalysis. Lancet Oncol 10: 559–68
Saif MW, Elfiky A, Salem RR (2007) Gastrointestinal perforation due to bevacizumab in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14: 1860–9
Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Mutri V, et al. (2009) Does stent placement for advanced colon cancer increase the risk of perforation during bevacizumab-based therapy? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7: 1174–6
Manes G, de Bellis M, Fuccio L, et al. (2011) Endoscopic palliation in patients with incurable malignant colorectal obstruction by means of self-expanding metal stent: analysis of results and predictors of outcomes in a large multicenter series. Arch Surg 146: 1157–62
Manfredi S, Sabbagh C, Vanbiervliet G, et al. (2014) Place of colorectal stents in therapeutic management of malignant large bowel obstructions. Endoscopy 46: 546–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Lecomte, T., Féau, S. & Caulet, M. Place des prothèses coliques dans la prise en charge du cancer colorectal. Oncologie 16, 593–598 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-014-2469-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-014-2469-9