Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

M-quantile models with application to poverty mapping

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been growing demand for estimates of population characteristics at small area level. Unfortunately, cost constraints in the design of sample surveys lead to small sample sizes within these areas and as a result direct estimation, using only the survey data, is inappropriate since it yields estimates with unacceptable levels of precision. Small area models are designed to tackle the small sample size problem. The most popular class of models for small area estimation is random effects models that include random area effects to account for between area variations. However, such models also depend on strong distributional assumptions, require a formal specification of the random part of the model and do not easily allow for outlier robust inference. An alternative approach to small area estimation that is based on the use of M-quantile models was recently proposed by Chambers and Tzavidis (Biometrika 93(2):255–268, 2006) and Tzavidis and Chambers (Robust prediction of small area means and distributions. Working paper, 2007). Unlike traditional random effects models, M-quantile models do not depend on strong distributional assumption and automatically provide outlier robust inference. In this paper we illustrate for the first time how M-quantile models can be practically employed for deriving small area estimates of poverty and inequality. The methodology we propose improves the traditional poverty mapping methods in the following ways: (a) it enables the estimation of the distribution function of the study variable within the small area of interest both under an M-quantile and a random effects model, (b) it provides analytical, instead of empirical, estimation of the mean squared error of the M-quantile small area mean estimates and (c) it employs a robust to outliers estimation method. The methodology is applied to data from the 2002 Living Standards Measurement Survey (LSMS) in Albania for estimating (a) district level estimates of the incidence of poverty in Albania, (b) district level inequality measures and (c) the distribution function of household per-capita consumption expenditure in each district. Small area estimates of poverty and inequality show that the poorest Albanian districts are in the mountainous regions (north and north east) with the wealthiest districts, which are also linked with high levels of inequality, in the coastal (south west) and southern part of country. We discuss the practical advantages of our methodology and note the consistency of our results with results from previous studies. We further demonstrate the usefulness of the M-quantile estimation framework through design-based simulations based on two realistic survey data sets containing small area information and show that the M-quantile approach may be preferable when the aim is to estimate the small area distribution function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battese GE, Harter RM and Fuller WA (1988). An error-components model for prediction of county op areas using survey and satellite data. J Am Stat Assoc 83(401): 28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betti G (2003). Poverty and inequality mapping in Albania: final report. World Bank and INSTAT (mimeo), Washington DC and Tirana

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigman D, Dercon S, Guillaume D and Lambotte M (2000). Community targeting for poverty reduction in Burkina Faso. World Bank Econ Rev 14(1): 167–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckling J and Chambers R (1988). M-quantiles. Biometrika 75(4): 761–71

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R and Dunstan R (1986). Estimating distribution functions from survey data. Biometrika 73(3): 597–604

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R, Dorfman AH (2003) Transformed variables in survey sampling. S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M03/21, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, UK

  • Chambers R and Tzavidis N (2006). M-quantile models for small area estimation. Biometrika 93(2): 255–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra H and Chambers R (2005). Comparing EBLUP and C-EBLUP for small area estimation. Stat Transit 7(3): 637–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbers C, Lanjouw J and Lanjouw P (2003). Mio-level estimation of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 71(1): 355–64

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fay RE and Herriot RA (1979). Estimates of income for small places: an application of James-Stein procedures to census data. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366): 269–77

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foster J, Greer J and Thorbecke E (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52(3): 761–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao JNK (2003). Small area estimation. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Royall RM and Cumberland WG (1978). Variance estimation in finite population sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 73(362): 351–58

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tzavidis N, Chambers R (2007) Robust prediction of small area means and distributions. Working paper (available upon request)

  • World Bank (2003) Albania poverty assessment. World Bank Report No. 26213-AL, Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos Tzavidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzavidis, N., Salvati, N., Pratesi, M. et al. M-quantile models with application to poverty mapping. Stat Meth Appl 17, 393–411 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0070-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0070-8

Keywords

Navigation