Abstract
Biological materials can undergo large deformations and also show viscoelastic behaviour. One such material is the network of actin filaments found in biological cells, giving the cell much of its mechanical stiffness. A theory for predicting the relaxation behaviour of actin networks cross-linked with the cross-linker α-actinin is proposed. The constitutive model is based on a continuum approach involving a neo-Hookean material model, modified in terms of concentration of chemically activated cross-links. The chemical model builds on work done by Spiros (Doctoral thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1998) and has been modified to respond to mechanical stress experienced by the network. The deformation is split into a viscous and elastic part, and a thermodynamically motivated rate equation is assigned for the evolution of viscous deformation. The model predictions were evaluated for stress relaxation tests at different levels of strain and found to be in good agreement with experimental results for actin networks cross-linked with α-actinin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biron D, Moses E (2004) The effect of α-actinin on the length distribution of f-actin. Biophys J 86: 3284–3290
Bonet J (2001) Large strain viscoelastic constitutive models. Int J Solids Struct 38: 2953–2968
Esue O, Tseng Y, Wirtz D (2009) α-actinin and filamin cooperatively enhance the stiffness of actin filament networks. PLoS ONE 4: 1–6
Evans E (1998) Energy landscapes of biomolecular adhesion and receptor anchoring at interfaces explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Faraday Discuss 111: 1–16
Fletcher DA, Mullins RD (2010) Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463: 485–493
Fraley TS, Pereira CB, Tran TC, Singleton CA, Greenwood JA (2005) Phosphoinositide binding regulates α-actinin dynamics. J Bio Chem 280: 15479–15482
Kamm RD, Mofrad MRK (2006) Introduction, with the biological basis for cell mechanics. In: MRK Mofrad RK (eds) Cytoskeletal mechanics: models and measurements. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 1–18
Kaunas R, Nguyen P, Usami S, Chien S (2005) Cooperative effects of rho and mechanical stretch on stress fiber organization. PNAS 102: 15895–15900
Kroon M (2010) A constitutive model for smooth muscle including active tone and passive viscoelastic behaviour. Math Med Biol 27: 129–155
Lieleg O, Bausch AR (2007) Cross-linker unbinding and self-similarity in bundled cytoskeletal networks. Phys Rev Lett 99: 15185–1–15185–4
Lieleg O, Schmoller KM, Cyron CJ, Luan Y, Wall WA, Bausch AR (2009a) Structural polymorphism in heterogenous cytoskeletal networks. Soft Matter 5: 1796–1803
Lieleg O, Schmoller KM, Claessens MMAE, Bausch AR (2009b) Cytoskeletal polymer networks: viscoelastic properties are determined by the microscopic interaction potential of cross-links. Biophys J 96: 4725–4732
Lubliner J (1985) A model of rubber viscoelasticity. Mech Res Commun 12: 93–99
Meyer RK, Aebi U (1990) Bundling of actin filaments by α-actinin depends on its molecular length. J Cell Biol 110: 2013–2024
Miyata H, Yasuda R, Kinosita K (1996) Strength and lifetime of the bond between actin and skeletal muscle α-actinin studied with an optical trapping technique. Biochim Biophys Acta 1290: 83–88
Nossal R (1988) On the elasticity of cytoskeletal networks. Biophys J 53: 349–359
Pardee JD (2010) The role of myosin in cell motility. In: Pardee JD (ed) The actin cytoskeleton in cell motility, cancer and infection, morgal & claypool life sciences, pp 37–50. http://www.morganclaypool.com
Pelletier O, Pokidysheva E, Hirst LS, Bouxsein N, Li Y, Safinya CR (2003) Structure of actin cross-linked with α-actinin: a network of bundles. Am Phys Soc 91: 148102–1–148102–4
Spiros AA (1998) Investigating models for cross-linker mediated actin filament dynamics. University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Stéphanou A (2006) Computational framework integrating cytoskeletal and adhesion dynamics for modeling cell motility. In: Chauviére A, Preziosi CVL (eds) Cell mechanics—from single scale-based model to multiscale modeling. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 159–177
Tempel M, Isenberg G, Sackmann E (1996) Temperature-induced sol-gel transition and microgel formation in α-actinin cross-linked actin networks: a rheological study. Am Phys Soc 54: 1802–1810
Tseng Y, Wirtz D (1996) Mechanics and multiple-particle tracking microheterogeneity of α-actinin cross-linked actin filament networks. Biophys J 81: 1643–1656
Wachsstock DH, Schwarz WH, Pollard TD (1993) Affinity of α-actinin for actin determines the structure and mechanical properties of actin filament gels. Biophys J 65: 205–214
Wachsstock DH, Schwarz WH, Pollard TD (1994) Cross-linker dynamics determine the mechanical properties of actin gels. Biophys J 66: 801–809
Xu J, Tseng Y, Wirtz D, Pollard TD (1998) Dynamic cross-linking by α-actinin determines the mechanical properties of actin filament networks. J Bio Chem 273: 9570–9576
Xu J, Tseng Y, Wirtz D (2000) Strain hardening of actin filament networks. J Bio Chem 275: 35886–35892
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fallqvist, B., Kroon, M. A chemo-mechanical constitutive model for transiently cross-linked actin networks and a theoretical assessment of their viscoelastic behaviour. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12, 373–382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0406-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0406-7