Abstract
Numerous studies have been conducted on the accuracy of teacher judgement in different educational areas such as mathematics, language arts and reading. Teacher judgement of students’ foreign-language achievement, however, has been rarely investigated. The study aimed to examine the accuracy of teacher judgement of students’ foreign-language achievement, uncover variables moderating the accuracy in a multilevel analysis and explore motivational and emotional characteristics of misjudged English learning students. Five hundred five Chinese fifth-grade students and their 16 English teachers took part in the investigation. Students completed a standardized English test and a questionnaire about motivation and emotion for English learning. Concurrently, English teachers estimated each of their students’ test performance. Teachers predicted the rank order of students’ achievement very accurately but tended to overestimate students’ level of achievement. Multilevel modelling revealed that neither students’ gender, performance level and perceived teacher treatment nor teachers’ teaching experience and level of education moderated the accuracy of teachers’ judgements. Underestimated students showed the same achievement as overestimated students but had a lower self-concept, higher anxiety and more shame about English learning. Although teachers’ judgements were fairly accurate, teachers’ underestimation of students’ achievement was associated with negative motivational and emotional characteristics of students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. S. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.731.
Auger, R. W. (2004). The accuracy of teacher reports in the identification of middle school students with depressive symptomatology. Psychology in the Schools. doi:10.1002/pits.10164.
Babad, E., Avni-Babad, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Teachers’ brief nonverbal behaviors in defined instructional situations can predict students’ evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.553.
Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers’ judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology. doi:10.1080/01443410020043878.
Begeny, J. C., Eckert, T. L., Montarello, S. A., & Storie, M. S. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ reading abilities: an examination of the relationship between teachers’ judgments and students’ performance across a continuum of rating methods. School Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.43.
Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Brown, K. G., & Mann, C. M. (2011). Teacher judgments of students’ reading abilities across a continuum of rating methods and achievement measures. School Psychology Review, 40, 23–38.
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382.
Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.5.631.
Chen, C. S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00932.x.
Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.141.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/h0044919.
Demaray, M. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Teachers’ judgments of students’ academic functioning: a comparison of actual and predicted performances. School Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1037/h0088969.
Dicke, A.-L., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagy, N. (2012). Judging students’ achievement goal orientations: are teacher ratings accurate? Learning and Individual Differences. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.004.
Doherty, J., & Conolly, M. (1985). How accurately can primary school teachers predict the scores of their pupils in standardised tests of attainment? A study of some non-cognitive factors that influence specific judgments. Educational Studies. doi:10.1080/0305569850110105.
Doyé, P., & Lüttge, D. (1977). Diagnostischer Leistungstest Englisch 5–6. Braunschweig: Westermann.
Enders, C., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2003). Accuracy of teacher judgments in predicting oral reading fluency. School Psychology Quarterly. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.1.52.20876.
Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2009). Teacher accuracy: an examination of teacher-based judgments of students’ reading with differing achievement levels. The Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.6.453-462.
Feng, D. (2006). China’s recent curriculum reform: progress and problems. Planning and Changing, 27, 131–144.
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. Psychological Review. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652.
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accuracy of personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0963721412445309.
Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2002). Conceptions of teaching held by school science teachers in P.R. China: identification and cross-cultural comparisons. Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500690110066926.
Gao, X., Barkhuizen, G., & Chow, A. W. K. (2011). ‘Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient’: understanding primary school English teachers’ conception of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research. doi:10.1177/1362168810383344.
Givvin, K. B., Stipek, D. J., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). In the eyes of the beholder: students’ and teachers’ judgments of students’ motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00060-3.
Havenstein, N. M., & Alexander, R. A. (1991). Rating ability in performance judgments: the joint influence of implicit theories and intelligence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90024-N.
Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with SPSS. New York: Routledge.
Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(87)90010-2.
Hoge, R. D., & Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.777.
Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: a review of literature. Review of Educational Research. doi:10.3102/00346543059003297.
Hoge, R. D., & Cudmore, L. (1986). The use of teacher-judgment measures in the identification of gifted pupils. Teaching and Teacher Education. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(86)90016-8.
Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_1.
Jin, L. X., & Cortazzi, M. (2002). English language teaching in China: a bridge to the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/0218879020220206.
Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.469.
Kaiser, J., Helm, F., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2012). Zum Zusammenhang von Intelligenz und Urteilsgenauigkeit bei der Beurteilung von Schülerleistungen im Simulierten Klassenraum [On the relation of intelligence and judgment accuracy in the process of assessing student achievement in the simulated classroom]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000076.
Leucht, M., Tiffin-Richards, S., Vock, M., Pant, H. A., & Köller, O. (2012). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Englischlehrkräften. Diagnostische Kompetenz von Englischlehrkräften bei der Bewertung von Schülerleistungen mit Hilfe des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Referenzrahmens für Sprachen [English teachers’ diagnostic skills in judging their students’ competences on the basis of the Common European Framework of Reference]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie. doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000071.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2004). Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Statistica Neerlandica. doi:10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x.
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. doi:10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & He, S. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEQ-M). Chinese version. User’s manual. Munich: University of Munich.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., & Hochstadt, M. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping. doi:10.1080/10615800412331303847.
Phelps, L. (2005). Academic achievement of children in China: the 2002 Fulbright experience. Psychology in the Schools. doi:10.1002/pits.20074.
PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Ed.). (2006). PISA 2003. Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2003. Documentation of measuring instruments]. Münster: Waxmann.
Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: the role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal. doi:10.3102/0002831210374874.
Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (1987). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrern: Komponenten und Wirkungen [Diagnostic competence of teachers: Components and effects]. Empirische Pädagogik, 1, 27–52.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education. Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers’ rating vs. standardized test: an empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198601)23:1<106::AID-PITS2310230117>3.0.CO;2-C.
Shavelson, R. J. (1983). Review of research on teachers’ pedagogical judgment, plans, and decisions. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 392–413.
Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research. doi:10.3102/00346543051004455.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124194022003004.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Lummis, M., Stigler, J., Liu, F., & Fang, G. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development. doi:10.2307/1130875.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., & Stigler, J. W. (1986). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science. doi:10.1126/science.3945803.
Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0027627.
Südkamp, A., Möller, J., & Pohlmann, B. (2008). Der Simulierte Klassenraum: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zur diagnostischen Kompetenz [The simulated classroom: an experimental study on diagnostic competence]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.261.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Urhahne, D., Chao, S.-H., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1348/000709910X504500.
Urhahne, D., Zhou, J., Stobbe, M., Chao, S.-H., Zhu, M., & Shi, J. (2010). Motivationale und affektive Merkmale unterschätzter Schüler. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostischen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Motivational and affective characteristics of underestimated students: a contribution to the diagnostic competence of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000021.
Wang, W., & Gao, X. (2008). English language education in China: a review of selected research. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi:10.1080/01434630802147908.
Zaunbauer, A. C. M., Retelsdorf, J., & Möller, J. (2009). Die Vorhersage von Englischleistungen am Anfang der Sekundarstufe [Prediction of English achievement in early secondary school]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.41.3.153.
Zhou, J., & Urhahne, D. (2013). Teacher judgment, student motivation, and the mediating effect of attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0114-9.
Ziegler, A., Dresel, M., Schober, B., & Stöger, H. (2005). Ulm Motivational Test Battery (UMTB): Documentation of items and scales (Ulm Educational Research Report, No. 15). Ulm: Ulm University, Department of Educational Psychology.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to sincerely thank Jiannong Shi from the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Chenghong Jing from the Cadres Training Department, Chaoyang Branch, Beijing Institute of Education, for the great help in the course of data collection, Ronald H. Heck from the University of Hawaii at Mānoa for providing valuable statistic advice about multilevel analysis and Christine M. Rubie-Davies from University of Auckland for proofreading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Mingjing Zhu. Psychology of Excellence in Business and Education, University of Munich, Leopoldstrasse 13, Postfach 64, D-80802, Munich, Germany. E-mail: mingjing.zhu@psy.lmu.de
Current themes of research:
Full-time doctoral student at the faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Munich, Germany. Teachers’ judgements of students’ academic achievement, motivation and emotion. Domain-specific perspective. Accuracy measurement. Influences of teachers’ judgements on student outcomes.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Zhu, M. J., & Urhahne, D. (2013). Assessing teachers’ judgements of students’ academic motivation and emotions across two rating methods. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Urhahne, D., Timm, O., Zhu, M. J., Tang, M. (2013). Sind unterschätzte Schüler weniger leistungsmotiviert als überschätzte Schüler? Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 45, 34–43.
Urhahne, D., Zhou, J., Stobbe, M., Chao, S. H., Zhu, M. J., Shi, J. N. (2010). Motivationale und affektive Merkmale unterschätzter Schüler. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostischen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 275–288.
Detlef Urhahne. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Passau, Innstr. 25, 94032 Passau, Germany
Current themes of research:
Professor of Psychology with special emphasis on Educational Psychology at the University of Passau, Germany. Teacher education. Motivation and emotion. E-learning. Science learning. High-ability studies.
Most relevant publications in the field of Psychology of Education:
Zhu, M. J., & Urhahne, D. (2013). Assessing teachers’ judgements of students’ academic motivation and emotions across two rating methods. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zhou, J., & Urhahne, D. (2013). Teacher judgment, student motivation, and the mediating effect of attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0114-9.
Urhahne, D., Timm, O., Zhu, M. J., Tang, M. (2013). Sind unterschätzte Schüler weniger leistungsmotiviert als überschätzte Schüler? Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 45, 34–43.
Urhahne, D., Chao, S.-H., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1348/000709910 × 504500.
Urhahne, D., Zhou, J., Stobbe, M., Chao, S. H., Zhu, M. J., Shi, J. N. (2010). Motivationale und affektive Merkmale unterschätzter Schüler. Ein Beitrag zur diagnostischen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 275–288.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, M., Urhahne, D. Teachers’ judgements of students’ foreign-language achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ 30, 21–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0225-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0225-6