Skip to main content
Log in

Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the core motivations for adopting smart home services and explored the approaches and processes through which the motivations were incorporated with the original technology acceptance model (TAM) and the acceptance of the services. To achieve this purpose, an Internet survey was conducted in South Korea. The data (N = 799) from the survey were analyzed using structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis. The results suggested that the perceived compatibility, connectedness, control, system reliability, and enjoyment of smart home services were positively related to the users’ intention to use the services, whereas there was a negative association between the perceived cost and usage intention. The structural results also provided evidence of the validity of the original TAM. Although smart home services have attracted users’ interest in the housing context, only a few studies have examined how the users’ intention to use the services is motivated. The present study represents an initial step to explore the process of adopting smart home services with potential future research areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boase, J.: Implications of software-based mobile media for social research. Mob. Media Commun. 1(1), 57–62 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.J., Wachter, K.: A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 361–370 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Waterman, D., Sherman, R., Ji, S.W.: The economics of online television: industry development, aggregation, and “TV Everywhere”. Telecommun. Policy 37(9), 725–736 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, X., Pogrebna, G., Ng, I.: Smart home, smart things and smart me in the smart city: the hub-of-all-things resource integration and enabling tool (HARRIET). In: Botting, D. (ed.) IET Conference on Future Intelligent Cities, pp. 1–6. IET, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balta-Ozkan, N., Boteler, B., Amerighi, O.: European smart home market development: public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 3, 65–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, H.J., Yeo, J.S.: A study on consumers’ levels of smart home service usage by service type and their willingness to pay for smart home services. Consum. Policy Educ. Rev. 11(4), 25–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alam, M.R., Reaz, M.B.I., Ali, M.A.M.: A review of smart homes—past, present, and future. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. C Appl. Rev. 42(6), 1190–1203 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meade, N., Islam, T.: Forecasting in telecommunications and ICT—a review. Int. J. Forecast. 31(4), 1105–1126 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jie, Y., Pei, J.Y., Jun, L., Yun, G., Wei, X.: Smart home system based on iot technologies. In: Jian, W., Shen, W., Jiang, W. (eds.) IEEE, Fifth International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences (ICCIS), pp. 1789–1891. IEEE Press, New York (2013)

  10. Lu CH: IoT-enabled smart sockets for reconfigurable service provision. In: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE-TW), pp. 330-331. New York (2015)

  11. Zhang, Q., Su, Y., Yu, P.: Assisting an elderly with early dementia using wireless sensors data in smarter safer home. In: Liu, K., Gulliver, S.R., Li, W., Yu, C. (eds.) Service Science and Knowledge Innovation, pp. 398–404. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bao, H., Chong, A.Y.L., Ooi, K.B., Lin, B.: Are Chinese consumers ready to adopt mobile smart home? An empirical analysis. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 12(5), 496–511 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Markets and Markets: Ambient assisted living and smart home market by product, services, assisted living, product (safety & security, communication, medical assistive, mobility, telemonitoring, compensatory impairment) and region - global trend & forecast to 2020. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ambient-assisted-living-smart-home-market-95414042.html (2016). Accessed 7 March 2016

  14. Strategy Analytics: About smart home. https://www.strategyanalytics.com/access-services/devices/connected-home/smart-home/about-smart-home#.VsGHN_mLSUk (2012). Accessed 7 March 2016

  15. Ghaffarian Hoseini, A., Dahlan, N.D., Berardi, U., Ghaffarian Hoseini, A., Makaremi, N.: The essence of future smart houses: from embedding ICT to adapting to sustainability principles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24, 593–607 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 25(1), 81–93 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Korea Association of Smart Home: Home network and smart home technologies. http://kashi.or.kr/board/index.html?board_id=pds&action=list&user_id=&group_seq=&Page=&site=kashi.or.kr&key=title&keyword= (2015). Accessed 7 March 2016

  18. Kim, H.S., Kim, H.C., Ji, Y.G.: User requirement elicitation for U-city residential environment: concentrated on smart home service. J. Soc. e-Bus. Stud. 20(1), 167–182 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, S.H., Choi, M.S.: A study on influence of trait values over user satisfaction of echo-boomer living with smart-home. J. Korea Real Estate Analysists Assoc. 21(1), 103–131 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Korea Association of Smart Home: Smart home industry. http://kashi.or.kr/board/index.html?board_id=pds&action=view&site=kashi.or.kr&key=title&keyword=%EC%8A%A4%EB%A7%88%ED%8A%B8%ED%99%88&page=3&seq=13399 (2013). Accessed 7 March 2016

  21. Byun, J., Jeon, B., Noh, J., Kim, Y., Park, S.: An intelligent self-adjusting sensor for smart home services based on ZigBee communications. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 58(3), 794–802 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo, D.W., Kim, H., Kim, J.S., Lee, J.Y.: Hybrid reality-based user experience and evaluation of a context-aware smart home. Comput. Ind. 76, 11–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Berg, C.: A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house. In: Cockburn, C., Furst-Dilic, R. (eds.) Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe. Open University Press, Buckingham (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Demiris, G., Rantz, M.J., Aud, M.A., Marek, K.D., Tyrer, H.W., Skubic, M., Hussam, A.A.: Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet Med. 29(2), 87–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Niyato, D., Xiao, L., Wang, P.: Machine-to-machine communications for home energy management system in smart grid. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(4), 53–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aldrich, F.K.: Smart homes: past, present and future. In: Harper, R. (ed.) Inside the Smart Home. Springer, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gagnon, M.-P., Godin, G., Gagné, C., Fortin, J.-P., Lamothe, L., Reinharz, D., Cloutier, A.: An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int. J. Med. Inform. 71(2), 103–115 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, J.V., Yen, D.C., Chen, K.: The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: a case study of a delivery service company in logistics. Inform. Manag. 46(4), 241–248 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lai, W.: Exploring use intention of a smart bike-sharing system-extending technology acceptance model with trust. In: Zhang, Z., Shen, Z.M., Zhang, J., Zhang, R. (eds.) LISS 2014, pp. 1597–1603. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taherdoost H, Masrom M, Ismail Z: Development of an instrument to measure smart card technology acceptance. http://www.icoci.cms.net.my/proceedings/2009/papers/PID239.pdf (2009). Accessed 7 March 2016

  33. Park, E., Kim, K.J., Jin, D., del Pobil, A.P.: Towards a successful mobile map service: an empirical examination of technology acceptance model. Commun. Comput. Inform. Sci. 293, 420–428 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van der Heijden, H.: Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Inform. Manag. 40(6), 541–549 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rese, A., Schreiber, S., Baier, D.: Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 21(5), 869–876 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yi, M.Y., Hwang, Y.: Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 59(4), 431–449 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheung, R., Vogel, D.: Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comput. Educ. 63, 160–175 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Park, E., del Pobil, A.P.: Users’ attitudes toward service robots in South Korea. Ind. Robot Int. J. 40(1), 77–87 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Park, E., Kim, K.J.: An integrated adoption model of mobile cloud services: exploration of key determinants and extension of technology acceptance model. Telemat. Inform. 31(3), 376–385 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shin, D.-H., Kim, W.-Y.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to cyworld user behavior: implication of the web2. 0 user acceptance. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(3), 378–382 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 13(1), 210–230 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., Wang, B.: Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 29–39 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., Chang, H.J.: Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Telemat. Inform. 31(1), 3–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, H.H., Chang, E.: Consumer attitudes toward online mass customization: an application of extended technology acceptance model. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 16(2), 171–200 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rausand, M., Høyland, A.: System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, vol. 396. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Park, E., Kim, H., Ohm, J.Y.: Understanding driver adoption of car navigation systems using the extended technology acceptance model. Behav. Inform. Technol. 34(7), 741–751 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., Liu, C.: Facilitating conditions, wireless trust and adoption intention. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 46(1), 17–24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Syst. Res. 16(1), 85–102 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gould, J.D., Lewis, C.: Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun. ACM 28(3), 300–311 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chung, B.Y., Skibniewski, M.J., Lucas Jr., H.C., Kwak, Y.H.: Analyzing enterprise resource planning system implementation success factors in the engineering–construction industry. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 22(6), 373–382 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C.-S., Wang, K.: Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Inform. Manag. 45(1), 52–64 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Managing user trust in B2C e-services. E-serv. J. 2(2), 7–24 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Daniel, E.: Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Int. J. Bank Mark. 17(2), 72–83 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J.G.: Explaining internet banking behavior: theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, or technology acceptance model? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 40(5), 1172–1202 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cheng, T.E., Lam, D.Y., Yeung, A.C.: Adoption of internet banking: an empirical study in Hong Kong. Decis. Support Syst. 42(3), 1558–1572 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shin, D.H.: Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: an implication for IP-based technologies. Inform. Manag. 46(1), 16–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Crespo, Á.H., de los Salmones, M.M.G, del Bosque, I.R.: Influence of Users’ Perceived Compatibility and Their Prior Experience on B2C e-Commerce Acceptance. In: Matsuo, T., Colomo-Palacios, R. (eds.) Electronic Business and Marketing, pp. 103–123. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  61. Holahan, P.J., Lesselroth, B.J., Adams, K., Wang, K., Church, V.: Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: a parsimonious and actionable model. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(3), 718–729 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Islam, A.N.: E-learning system use and its outcomes: moderating role of perceived compatibility. Telemat. Inform. 33(1), 48–55 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ramos-de-Luna, I., Montoro-Ríos, F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F.: Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: an acceptance model approach. Inform. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. (2015). doi:10.1007/s10257-015-0284-5

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kim, S.H.: Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Inform. Manag. 45(6), 387–393 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wessels, L., Drennan, J.: An investigation of consumer acceptance of M-banking. Int. J. Bank Mark. 28(7), 547–568 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bertrand, M., Bouchard, S.: Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. J. Cyber Ther. Rehabil. 1(2), 200–210 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Son, H., Park, Y., Kim, C., Chou, J.-S.: Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 28, 82–90 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Williams, T., Bernold, L., Lu, H.: Adoption patterns of advanced information technologies in the construction industries of the United States and Korea. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 133(10), 780–790 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ansolabehere, S., Konisky, D.M.: Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants. Public Opin. Q. (2009). doi:10.1093/poq/nfp041

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., Pahnila, S.: Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Res. 14(3), 224–235 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kim, J., Ahn, K., Chung, N.: Examining the factors affecting perceived enjoyment and usage intention of ubiquitous tour information services: a service quality perspective. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 18(6), 598–617 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang, Y.S., Lin, H.H., Liao, Y.W.: Investigating the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment in students’ use of blogging. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(1), 139–152 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Shin, D.-H.: Analysis of online social networks: a cross-national study. Online Inform. Rev. 34(3), 473–495 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kwon, S.J., Park, E., Kim, K.J.: What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter. Soc. Sci. J. 51(4), 534–544 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jackson, J.D., Yi, M.Y., Park, J.S.: An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Inform. Manag. 50(4), 154–161 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., Wang, B.: Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(1), 29–39 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Chen, I.Y.: The factors influencing members’ continuance intentions in professional virtual communities—a longitudinal study. J. Inform. Sci. 33(4), 451–467 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Hartono, E., Holsapple, C.W., Kim, K.-Y., Na, K.-S., Simpson, J.T.: Measuring perceived security in B2C electronic commerce website usage: a respecification and validation. Decis. Support Syst. 62, 11–21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Schierz, P.G., Schilke, O., Wirtz, B.W.: Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(3), 209–216 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Mohagheghi, P., Gilani, W., Stefanescu, A., Fernandez, M.A.: An empirical study of the state of the practice and acceptance of model-driven engineering in four industrial cases. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(1), 89–116 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kim, K.J., Shin, D.-H.: An acceptance model for smart watches: implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Res. 25(4), 527–541 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Sheng, X., Zolfagharian, M.: Consumer participation in online product recommendation services: augmenting the technology acceptance model. J. Serv. Mark. 28(6), 460–470 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Son, H., Park, Y., Kim, C., Chou, J.S.: Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom. Constr. 28, 82–90 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lee, D.Y., Lehto, M.R.: User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput. Educ. 61, 193–208 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sun, Y., Liu, L., Peng, X., Dong, Y., Barnes, S.J.: Understanding Chinese users’ continuance intention toward online social networks: an integrative theoretical model. Electron. Mark. 24(1), 57–66 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Park, E., Ohm, J.: Factors influencing users’ employment of mobile map services. Telemat. Inform. 31(2), 253–265 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16(1), 74–94 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L.: Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct. Equ. Modeling Multidiscip. J. 6(1), 56–83 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Byrne, B.M.: Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications, New York (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Marcoulides, G.A., Schumacker, R.E.: Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Psychology Press, Abingdon (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Dongguk University Research Fund of 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Jib Kwon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, E., Kim, S., Kim, Y. et al. Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 175–190 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0533-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0533-0

Keywords

Navigation