Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accessibility of the Italian institutional web pages: a survey on the compliance of the Italian public administration web pages to the Stanca Act and its 22 technical requirements for web accessibility

  • Communication
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accessibility of the Italian public administration web pages is ruled by the Stanca Act and in particular the Decree of the Minister issued on July 8, 2005. In this paper, an objective test is performed on the official web pages of the Italian province and region chief towns to check their compliance to the 22 technical requirements defined by the Stanca Act. A sample of 976 web pages belonging to the websites of the Italian chief towns have been downloaded in the period October–December 2012. Such a data collection has been submitted to Achecker, the worldwide recognized syntax and accessibility validation service. Several accessibility and syntax errors have been found following the automatic analysis. Such errors have been classified, a statistic has been produced, and some graphs are included to offer an immediate view of the error distribution. Moreover, the most frequent errors are pointed out and explained in detail. Although the Stanca Act has been promulgated some years ago, and contains precise indications about updating a web page to be compliant to the 22 technical requirements, all the analyzed websites are not fully compliant to the law. Updating web pages to be compliant to the Stanca Act is a slow process and some grave errors are still present, both in terms of syntax and accessibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.w3.org/WAI/

  2. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag

  3. Power, C., Freire, A.P., Petrie, H., Swallow, D.: Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. CHI, 433–442 (2012)

  4. Vigo, M., Brajnik, G.: Automatic web accessibility metrics: Where we are and where we can go. Interact. Comput. 23(2), 137–155 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vigo, M., Brajnik, G., Connor, J.O (eds.): Research Report on Web Accessibility Metrics. W3C WAI Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) Notes. (2012). http://www.w3.org/TR/accessibility-metrics-report

  6. Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 p. (2013). doi:10.1145/2461121.2461124

  7. Salomoni, P., Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Battistelli, M.: Integrating manual and automatic evaluations to measure accessibility barriers computers helping people with special needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7382, pp. 388–395. ISBN: 978-3-642-31521-3

  8. Brajnik, G.: The troubled path of accessibility engineering: an overview of traps to avoid and hurdles to overcome. SIGACCESS Newsletter 100, 1–11 (2011). 10.1145/1982572.1982573

  9. Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Salomoni, P., Roccetti, M.: Metrics for Accessibility: experiences with the Vamola’ project. In: Proceedings 6th ACM International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (WEB4A), pp. 142–145. ACM Press, New York (2009). ISBN: 978-1-60558-561-1

  10. http://www.validatore.it/vamola_validator/checker/index.php

  11. Battistelli, M., Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Salomoni P., Spagnoli, S.: Making the tree fall sound: reporting web accessibility with the VaMoL monitor. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Methodologies, Technologies and Tools Enabling e-Government, Camerino, Italy, 30th June–1st July (2011)

  12. http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/

  13. Cooper, M., Sloan, D., Kelly, B., Lewthwaite, S.: A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: putting people and processes first. In: W4A ’12 Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. Article No. 20. ISBN: 978-1-4503-1019-2

  14. Baowaly, M.K., Bhuiyan, M.: Accessibility analysis and evaluation of Bangladesh government websites. IEEE International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), pp. 46–51 (2012). ISBN: 978-1-4673-1153-3

  15. Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Aziz, M.A., Muhammad, R.B.A.R.: Evaluating the accessibility of small and medium enterprise (SME) websites in Malaysia. In: International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 135–140 (2011). ISBN:978-1-4577-1655-3

  16. Jati, H., Dominic, D.D.: Website accessibility performance evaluation in Malaysia. In: International Symposium on Information Technology, 2008. IT Sim 2008, vol. 1, pp. 1–3. ISBN:978-1-4244-2327-9. doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631587

  17. Bakhsh, M., Mehmood, A.: Web accessibility for disabled: a case study of government websites in Pakistan. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), pp. 342–347 (2012). ISBN: 978-1-4673-4946-8

  18. Loiacono, E.T., McCoy, S., Chin, W.: Federal web site accessibility for people with disabilities. IT Prof. 7(1), 27–31. IEEE Computer Society. Jan–Feb 2005. ISSN:1520-9202

  19. Basdekis, I., Klironomos, I., Metaxas, I., Stephanidis, C: An overview of web accessibility in Greece: a comparative study 2004–2008. In: Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185–190. Springer. June (2010). ISSN: 1615-5289

  20. Paris, M.: Website accessibility: a survey of local e-government websites and legislation in Northern Ireland. In: Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 292–299. Springer. May 2006. ISSN: 1615-5289

  21. Al-Khalifa, Hend S.: The accessibility of Saudi Arabia government Web sites: an exploratory study. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(2), 201–210 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Khalifa, H.S., Al-Kanhal, M., Al-Nafisah, H., Al-soukaih, N., Al-hussain, E., Al-onzi, M.: A pilot study for evaluating Arabic websites using automated WCAG 2.0 evaluation tools. In: Innovations in Information Technology (IIT), 2011 International Conference on, pp. 293–296, 25–27 April (2011). doi:10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2011.5893835

  23. Nizar, A.A.A., Obedidat, A., Abu-Addose, H.Y.: Accessibility as an indicator of Jordanian E-government website quality. In: Fourth International Conference on e-Learning-Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity, pp. 156–160, 7–9 May (2013). doi:10.1109/ECONF.2013.45

  24. Lee, S., Kim, B.G., Kim, J.G.: Accessibility evaluation of Korean e-government. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4556, pp. 73–78 (2007). ISBN:978-3-540-73282-2

  25. Park, H.M.: The Web Accessibility Crisis of the Korea’s Electronic Government: Fatal Consequences of the Digital Signature Law and Public Key Certificate. System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, pp. 2319–2328, 4–7 Jan. (2012). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.591

  26. http://www.pubbliaccesso.gov.it/biblioteca/documentazione/guidelines_study/2_technical_reqs.htm

  27. Brajnik, G., Mulas, A., Pitton, C.: Effects of sampling methods on web accessibility evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (Assets ’07), pp. 59–66. ACM, New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/1296843.1296855

  28. http://www.w3.org/TR/AERT#color

  29. http://www.funzionepubblica.gov.it/lazione-del-ministro/linee-guida-siti-web-pa/indice/cap4-garantire-la-qualita-dei-siti/requisiti-per-laccessibilita.aspx

  30. http://webaccessibile.org/articoli/comparazione-wcag-20-e-requisiti-legge-stanca-premessa/

  31. http://www.pubbliaccesso.gov.it/english/index.htm

  32. Nizar, A.A.A., Obedidat, A., Abu-Addose, H.Y.: Accessibility as an indicator of Jordanian E-Government Website Quality. In: 2013 Fourth International Conference on e-Learning- Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity, pp. 156–160, 7–9 May 2013. doi:10.1109/ECONF.2013.45

  33. Giakoumis, D., Votis, K., Tzovaras, D., Likothanassis, S., Hassapis, G.: Introducing accessibility in the web services domain. In: 3rd IEEE international conference on computer science and information technology (ICCSIT), pp. 18–22 (2010). ISBN: 978-1-4244-5540-9

  34. Al-Khalifa1, H.S., Al-Kanhal, M., Al-Nafisah, H., Al-soukaih, N., Al-hussain, E., Al-onzi, M.: A pilot study for evaluating arabic websites using automated WCAG 2.0 evaluation tools, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 201–210. Universal Access in the Information Society. June (2012). ISBN: 978-1-4577-0311-9

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratefulness to Margherita Di Giorgio (Specialist Social Worker) and Miss Gaetana Scalici for their kind support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Learning Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Building 15, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Orazio Gambino, Roberto Pirrone & Fabrizio Di Giorgio

Authors
  1. Orazio Gambino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Pirrone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fabrizio Di Giorgio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orazio Gambino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gambino, O., Pirrone, R. & Giorgio, F.D. Accessibility of the Italian institutional web pages: a survey on the compliance of the Italian public administration web pages to the Stanca Act and its 22 technical requirements for web accessibility. Univ Access Inf Soc 15, 305–312 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0381-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0381-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation