Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An examination of the Internet’s development as a disabling environment in the context of the social model of disability and anti-discrimination legislation in the UK and USA

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research indicates that inaccessible website design persists despite the existence of anti-discrimination legislation and the influence of the social model of disability on policy development. In this paper, the concept of universal access is examined in the light of the social model of disability in relation to both the physical and virtual environments. The manner in which disability is often deemed a design afterthought is highlighted. The need for universal access is then placed alongside a discussion of access to the Internet in relation to an ageing population and people with cognitive difficulties. Subsequently, anti-discrimination provisions are analysed in relation to how they support designers’ focus on an accepted normality to which reasonable adjustments need to be made, rather than the acquisition of full universal access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Disability Rights Commission The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People. TSO, London (2004). http://www.acesso.umic.pt/estudos/drc_2004.pdf. Accessed 03 Sept 2010

  2. W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (2008). http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed 06 Oct 2010

  3. The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 c50

  4. Nomensa United Nations Global Audit of Web Accessibility. Nomensa, Bristol (2006). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/documents/fnomensarep.pdf. Accessed 04 Aug 2010

  5. Oliver, M.: Changing the social relations of research production. Disabil. Handicap. Soc. 7(2), 101–114 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Shakespeare, T., Watson, N.: The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? Res. Social Sci.Disabil. 2, 9–28 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finkelstein, V.: Phase 2: discovering the person in “disability” and “rehabilitation”. Magic Carpet 27(1), 31–38 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marx, K.: A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, p. 266. Progress Publishers, Chicago (1913)

  9. Vonnegut, K.: Harrison Bergeron. In: Vonnegut, K. (ed.) Welcome to the Monkey House, pp. 19–25. Panther, St.Albans (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldon, A.: Changing technology. In: Swain, J., et al. (eds.) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, p. 156. Sage, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goggin, G., Newell, C.: Digital Disability, p. 8. Rowman and Littlefield, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shakespeare, T.: Disability, identity and difference. In: Barnes, C., Mercer, G. (eds.) Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, p. 96. The Disability Press, Leeds (1996). http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm. Accessed 03 Feb 2008

  13. Connell, B., Sanford, J.: Research implications of universal design. In: Steinfeld, E., Danford, S. (eds.) Enabling Environments, pp. 35–57. Springer, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Beckett, A.: Citizenship and Vulnerability. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Imrie, R., Hall, P.: Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. Spon, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morris, J.: Our Homes, Our Rights: Housing, Independent Living and Physically Disabled People. Shelter, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gleeson, B.: Geographies of Disablement, pp. 175–176. Routledge, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. NTIA Department of Commerce: Falling through the Net: A survey of the “Have nots” in rural and urban America. Washington DC (1995). http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2010

  19. Imrie, R.: Disability and the City: International Perspectives. Paul Chapman, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2008 http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2010

  21. Kayess, R., French, P.: Out of darkness into light? Introducing the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Hum. Rights Law Rev. 8(1), 1–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen, J.: Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Peachpit Press, Berkeley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Center For Universal Design. http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_us/about_us.htm. Accessed 10 July 2010

  24. Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Akoumianakis, D., Bevan, N., Brewer, J., Emiliani, P.L., Galetsas, A., Haataja, S., Iakovidis, I., Jacko, J., Jenkins, P., Karshmer, A., Korn, P., Marcus, A., Murphy, H., Stary, C., Vanderheiden, G., Weber, G., Ziegler, J.: Toward an information society for all: an international R&D agenda. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 10(2), 107–134 (1998). http://www.ics.forth.gr/proj/at-hci/files/white_paper_1998.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2010

    Google Scholar 

  25. European Commission Recommendations to the European Council: Europe and the global information society—The Bangemann Report, Brussels, Belgium (1994). http://www.ispo.cec.be/infosoc/backg/bangeman.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2010. http://www.ics.forth.gr/proj/at-hci/files/white_paper_1998.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2010

  26. Marble, S.: Architecture and Body. Rizzels, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vanderheiden, G.: Thirty-something million: should they be exceptions? Hum. Fact. 32, 383–396 (1990). http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/30_some/30_some.htm. Accessed 09 Aug 2010

  28. Goggin, G., Newell, C.: An end to disabling policies? Toward enlightened universal service. Inf. Soc. 16, 127–133 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. The Telecommunications Act 1984 c12

  30. European Parliament Directive 98/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for telecommunications in a competitive environment [1998] Official Journal L101, 0024–0047 (1998)

  31. Office of Telecommunications: Telecommunications Services for people with disabilities: Statement. OFTEL, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kinsella, K., He, W.: An Aging World 2008: International Population Reports. US Census Bureau June (2009). http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p95-09-1.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2010

  33. Office for National Statistics Mid-year Population Estimates (2005)

  34. Young, G.: The implications of an ageing population for the UK economy. Bank of England (2002). http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/workingpapers/wp159.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2010

  35. Better Government for Older People http://www.bgop.org.uk/index.aspx?primarycat=2. Accessed 09 Aug 2010

  36. Macfarlane, A.: Disability and ageing. In: Swain, J., et al. (eds.) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, p. 191. Sage, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sourbati, M.: Internet use in sheltered housing: older people’s access to new media and online service delivery. The Digital Age: Opportunities or Exclusion Series: Joseph Rowntree Foundation p. 28 (2004)

  38. Williams, G.: Towards a materialist phenomenology. In: Shakespeare, T. (ed) The Disability Reader, 3rd edn, p. 243. Continuum, London (2000)

  39. Emerson, E., Hatton, C.: Estimating Future Need/Demand for Supports for Adults with Learning Disabilities in England. Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University (2004). http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/ihr/research/learning/download/estimatingfutureneed.pdf. Accessed 09 Aug 2010

  40. The Disability Discrimination Act 2005 c13

  41. The Disability Discrimination Act 2005 (Commencement No. 2) Order 2005 No. 2774 (C113) http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20052774.htm. Accessed 04 Aug 2010

  42. DWP Delivering Equality for Disabled People A consultation on the extension of the Disability Discrimination Act to functions of public authorities, and the introduction of a duty to promote equality for disabled people. Department of Work and Pensions para 1.5 (2004). http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/dwp/2004/equality/main_doc.pdf. Accessed 04 July 2010

  43. Smith, J.: Interview with Judy Brewer. The Web Standards Project (2008). http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/may2007/. Accessed 04 Feb 2010

  44. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., Zeng, X.: A retrospective look at website accessibility over time. Behav. Inf. Technol. 24(6), 407–417 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Poulson, D., Nicolle, C.: Making the internet accessible for people with cognitive and communication impairments. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 48–56 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. The Americans with Disabilities Act 1990 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq [USA: Federal Law]

  47. Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [Australian Commonwealth]

  48. United States Code of Federal Regulations (7/1/94) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/. Accessed 04 Sept 2010

  49. Gooding, C.: Disabling Laws, Enabling Acts, p. 74. Pluto Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  50. The Civil Rights Act 1964 Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 [USA: Federal Law]

  51. Nelson v Thornborough 567 F.Supp 369 (1983)

  52. The Equality Act 2010 c15

  53. Smith v Churchills Stairlifts plc [2006] IRLR 41 CS

  54. USA Rehabilitation Act 1973 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq [USA: Federal Law]

  55. Harvard Law Review: Note: employment discrimination against the handicapped and section 504 of the rehabilitation act: an essay on legal evasiveness. Harvard Law Rev. 97(4), 997–1015 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Barnes, C.: Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. Hurst In association with the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People, London (1991). http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm. Accessed 04 Aug 2010

  57. The Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons (Amendment) Act 1976 c49

  58. The Building Act 1984 c55

  59. The Building (Electronic Communications) Order 2008 No 2334 SI 2008/2334

  60. Disability Rights Commission Code of Practice: Rights of Access. TSO, London (2006). http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/Documents/Disability/Services/Access_code.pdf. Accessed 01 Sept 2010

  61. HMSO (1995) White Paper Ending discrimination against disabled people Cm 2729 London: HMSO para 4.4

  62. Doyle, B.: Disability Discrimination: Law and Practice, 6th edn, p. 147. Jordans Ltd, London (2008)

  63. Maguire v SOCOG H 99/1

  64. PMI v Latif Appeal No. UKEAT/0028/07CEA 2007

  65. Disability Rights Commission Code of Practice: Rights of Access. TSO, London (2006) para 10.47. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/Documents/Disability/Services/Access_code.pdf. Accessed 01 Feb 2010

  66. Allen v The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc Claim No. 7SE51122 November 2008

  67. Imrie, R.: From universal to inclusive design in the built environment. In: Swain, J., et al. (eds.) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, p. 283. Sage, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Greer, N.: The state of the art of design for accessibility. Architecture 58–60 (1987)

  69. Walker, A.: Universal access and the built environment—or from glacier to garden gate. In: Zarb, G. (ed.) Removing Disabling Barriers, pp. 38–48. Policy Studies Institute, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lax, S.: The internet and democracy. In: Gauntlett, D. (ed.) Web.studies, p. 166. Arnold, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Golledge, R.: Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Transactions 21(2), 63–85 at p 64 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Moser, I.: Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Inf. Commun. Soc. 9(3), 373–395 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Manchester Metropolitan University, Sandra Burslem Building, Lower Ormond Street, Manchester, M15 6HB, UK

    Catherine Easton

Authors
  1. Catherine Easton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Easton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Easton, C. An examination of the Internet’s development as a disabling environment in the context of the social model of disability and anti-discrimination legislation in the UK and USA. Univ Access Inf Soc 12, 105–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0268-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0268-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation