Skip to main content
Log in

Solving Quadratic Equations via PhaseLift When There Are About as Many Equations as Unknowns

  • Published:
Foundations of Computational Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note shows that we can recover any complex vector \(\boldsymbol {x}_{0} \in \mathbb {C}^{n}\) exactly from on the order of n quadratic equations of the form |〈a i ,x 0〉|2=b i , i=1,…,m, by using a semidefinite program known as PhaseLift. This improves upon earlier bounds in Candès et al. (Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66:1241–1274, 2013), which required the number of equations to be at least on the order of nlogn. Further, we show that exact recovery holds for all input vectors simultaneously, and also demonstrate optimal recovery results from noisy quadratic measurements; these results are much sharper than previously known results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Upon retrieving , a simple factorization recovers x 0 up to global phase, i.e. multiplication by a complex scalar of unit magnitude.

  2. The work in [1] shows that with probability one, m=4n−2 randomized equations as in Theorem 1.1 are sufficient for the intractable phase retrieval problem (1.1) to have a unique solution.

  3. For any unit-normed vector x, there is \(\boldsymbol {x}_{0} \in \mathcal {N}_{\epsilon}\) with ∥x 02=1 and ∥xx 02ϵ, where ϵ>0.

  4. The careful reader will note that we can get a far better constant by observing that the proof of Theorem 1.2 also yields ∥Y T F ≤1/4. Hence, we have .

References

  1. R. Balan, P.G. Casazza, D. Edidin, On signal reconstruction without noisy phase, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 20, 345–356 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. E.J. Candès, Y. Eldar, T. Strohmer, V. Voroninski, Phase retrieval via matrix completion, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 6(1), 199–225 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. E.J. Candès, T. Strohmer, V. Voroninski, Phaselift: exact and stable signal recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66, 1241–1274 (2013).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Demanet, P. Hand, Stable optimizationless recovery from phaseless linear measurements. ArXiv e-prints, August 2012.

  5. R. Vershynin, Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices, in Compressed Sensing: Theory and Applications, ed. by Y.C. Eldar, G. Kutyniok (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012), pp. 210–268.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

E.C. is partially supported by AFOSR under grant FA9550-09-1-0643 and by ONR under grant N00014-09-1-0258. X.L. thanks Vladislav Voroninski for useful discussions related to this project. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful comments. This work was partially presented at the University of California at Berkeley in January 2012, and at the University of British Columbia in February 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel J. Candès.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Todd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Candès, E.J., Li, X. Solving Quadratic Equations via PhaseLift When There Are About as Many Equations as Unknowns. Found Comput Math 14, 1017–1026 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9162-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9162-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation