Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trust and functional foods. New products, old issues

  • Forum
  • Published:
Poiesis & Praxis

Abstract

Trust in the "agro-food" sector has been declining in recent years reflecting a general decline of trust in traditional decision making processes. The introduction of new technologies in the production of foods re-introduces the problem of trust and highlights the parameters affecting its structure and direction. This paper discusses the issue of trust in relation to the introduction of functional foods into the market. Trust is assessed as both a philosophical and a psychological construct with particular emphasis on its communication aspects. The paper ends with specific recommendations for action in the agro-food sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Neophobia is the tendency of consumers to avoid or resist unknown foods, a trait that might be particularly strong in relation to novel foods. It has been argued that this tendency might have an evolutionary origin.

  2. Annette Baier (1986); Richard Holton (1994); Karen Jones (1996) Trust as an affective attitude. In: Ethics, vol. 107, pp. 4–25; Russell Hardin (1996) Trustworthiness. In: Ethics, vol. 107, pp. 26–42; and Lawrence Becker (1996).

References

  • Arrow K (1974) The limits of organization. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier A (1986) Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96:231–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber B (1983) The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker L (1996) Trust as noncognitive security about motives. Ethics 107:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredahl L (2001) Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—results of a cross-national survey. J Consumer Policy 24:23–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporatewatch (2000) The next generation of frankenfoods: so-called "functional foods". Report taken from the UK website of Corporatewatch, June 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Diplock AT, Aggett PJ, Ashwell M, Bornet F, Fern EB, Roberfroid MB (1999) Scientific concepts of functional foods in Europe: consensus document. Brit J Nutr 81:supplement 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC, Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2002) Trust and confidence: a dual-mode model of cooperation. Western Washington University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC, Cvetkovich G (1995) Social trust: toward a cosmopolitan society. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle TC, Cvetkovich G (1994) Risk communication: the social construction of meaning and trust. In: Brehmer B, Sahlin NE (eds) Future risks and risk management. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands

  • Euromonitor (2000) Functional foods: a world survey. Euromonitor, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frewer LJ, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R (1996) What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal16:473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust—the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg I (1994) Functional foods, designer foods, pharmafoods, neutraceuticals. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasman M, Mellentin J (2001) Eating and drinking in the risk society—implications of risk for functional food. The functional foods revolution—healthy people, healthy profits? Earthscan, vol 4, pp 79–96, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton R (1994) Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australa J Philos 72:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J (2000) Truth, trust and medicine. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BB, Slovic P (1995) Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust. Risk Anal 15:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liakopoulos M (2001) The politics of technology assessment. In: Decker M (ed) Interdisciplinarity in technology assessment; implementation and its chances and limits. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  • Luhmann N (1979) Trust and power. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Menrad M, Hüsing B, Menrad K, Reiß T, Beer-Borst S, Zenger CA (2000) Technology assessment: functional food. Schweizerischer Wissenschaftsrat, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Midden CJH, Boy D, Einsiedel E, Fjaestadt B, Gaskell G, Liakopoulos M, Miller J, Olsson S, Wagner W (2002) The structure of public perceptions. In: Gaskell G, Bauer M (eds) Biotechnology and the public. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • O'Neill O (2002) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen JB (1999) Danisch consumers' attitudes towards functional foods. MAPP Working paper no 62, 2

  • Renn O, Levine D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RF, Stallen PJM (eds) Communicating risks to the public: international perspectives. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Seligman A (1997) The problem of trust. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Anal 13:675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka P (1999) Trust—a sociological theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • TAB (1999) Functional food – Funktionelle Lebensmittel. Report to the German Parliamentary Office of Technology Assessment, Berlin, Germany

  • Verbeke W, Viaene J (2001) Consumer attitudes towards functional foods: exploring knowledge, perception and acceptance. Eursafe 2001:401–404

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor C.F. Gethmann for comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miltos Liakopoulos.

Additional information

This paper partly reflects work done with Professor Cees Midden, Technical University of Eindhoven, as part of an expert technology assessment project for the Europaeische Akademie Bad Neuenahr Ahrweiler GmbH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liakopoulos, M., Schroeder, D. Trust and functional foods. New products, old issues. Poiesis Prax 2, 41–52 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-003-0032-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-003-0032-7

Keywords

Navigation