Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender differences in French GPs’ activity: the contribution of quantile regressions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any fee-for-service system, doctors may be encouraged to increase the number of services (private activity) they provide to receive a higher income. Studying private activity determinants helps to predict doctors’ provision of care. In the context of strong feminization and heterogeneity in general practitioners’ (GP) behavior, we first aim to measure the effects of the determinants of private activity. Second, we study the evolution of these effects along the private activity distribution. Third, we examine the differences between male and female GPs. From an exhaustive database of French GPs working in private practice in 2008, we performed an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and quantile regressions (QR) on the GPs’ private activity. Among other determinants, we examined the trade-offs within the GPs’ household considering his/her marital status, spousal income, and children. While the OLS results showed that female GPs had less private activity than male GPs (−13 %), the QR results emphasized a private activity gender gap that increased significantly in the upper tail of the distribution. We also find gender differences in the private activity determinants, including family structure, practice characteristics, and case-mix variables. For instance, having a youngest child under 12 years old had a positive effect on the level of private activity for male GPs and a negative effect for female GPs. The results allow us to understand to what extent the supply of care differs between male and female GPs. In the context of strong feminization, this is essential to consider for organizing and forecasting the GPs’ supply of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 67 %, according to Eco-Santé, Adeli. The remaining 33 % are salaried GPs practicing at a hospital or nursing home.

  2. The median percentage of income earned from salaried activities for self-employed GPs who work part time as salaried workers is 10 %. These GPs are more likely to be women, to perform fewer acts, to conduct fewer home visits, and are more likely to be located in rural areas.

  3. According to a list of illnesses and to coordinate for a referral doctor (médecin traitant).

  4. Since the implementation of the ‘care pathway’ (2004), patients can consult with the GP they want, but they are required to report to the public insurer through a médecin traitant) who is in charge of coordinating the treatments and allowing access to secondary care (specialists).

  5. MEP GPs are older, more likely to be women, practice less in rural areas, perform fewer services, and conduct fewer home visits, but they perform more specialized procedures than other GPs.

  6. Any service provided by such a doctor is not compensated by the public health insurance and also by most complementary health insurance. This group includes 1.15 % of GPs.

  7. We did not use the logarithm of the total number of services because the total number of services was better adjusted with a normal distribution.

  8. We measure age in deviations from the age of 30 years.

  9. Civil partnership corresponds to the civil solidarity pact, commonly known as a PACS, which is a form of civil union between two adults (same sex or opposite sex). The PACS was approved by the French Parliament in November 1999.

  10. The elasticity calculation was \(- 0.027 = - 0.007\,*\,\frac{20811.94}{5329}\) for men and \(- 0.031 = - 0.002*\frac{61300.84}{3908}\) for women.

  11. For female GPs, the difference between the coefficient for having a youngest child under 12 years of age and having a youngest child over 12 years old was significant (p < 0.05), whereas for male GPs, the difference was not significant.

References

  1. OECD: Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators (2013)

  2. CNOM: Atlas de la démographie médicale (2011)

  3. Jovic, E., Wallace, J.E., Lemaire, J.: The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Serv. Res. 6, 55 (2006)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, P., Gribben, B., Scott, A., Lay-Yee, R.: The “supply hypothesis” and medical practice variation in primary care: testing economic and clinical models of inter-practitioner variation. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982(50), 407–418 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Groenewegen, P.P., Hutten, J.B.: The influence of supply-related characteristics on general practitioners’ workload. Soc. Sci. Med. 1982(40), 349–358 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaye, C., Tilyard, M.: A qualitative comparative investigation of variation in general practitioners’ prescribing patterns. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 52, 381–386 (2002)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boerma, W.G., van den Brink-Muinen, A.: Gender-related differences in the organization and provision of services among general practitioners in Europe: a signal to health care planners. Med. Care 38, 993–1002 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Constant, A., Léger, P.T.: Estimating differences between male and female physician service provision using panel data. Health Econ. 17, 1295–1315 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fauvet, L., Romain, O., Buisine, S., Laurent, P.: Les affectations des étudiants en médecine à l’issue des épreuves classantes nationales en 2011. Etudes Résultats (2012)

  10. Bensing, J.M., van den Brink-Muinen, A., de Bakker, D.H.: Gender differences in practice style: a Dutch study of general practitioners. Med. Care 31, 219–229 (1993)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Breuil-Genier, P., Gofette, C.: La durée des séances des médecins généralistes. Etudes Résultats (2006)

  12. Béjean, S., Peyron, C., Urbinelli, R.: Variations in activity and practice patterns: a French study for GPs. Eur. J. Health Econ. 8, 225–236 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dedobbeleer, N., Contandriopoulos, A.P., Desjardins, S.: Convergence or divergence of male and female physicians’ hours of work and income. Med. Care 33, 796–805 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Samson, A.-L., Delattre, E.: Stratégies de localisation des médecins généralistes français: mécanismes économiques ou hédonistes? Econ. Stat. 455, 115–142 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samson, A.-L.: La dispersion des honoraires des omnipraticiens sur la période 1983–2004: une application de la méthode des régressions quantiles. Sér. Etudes. (2006)

  16. Samson, A.-L.: Do French low-income GPs choose to work less? Health Econ. 20, 1110–1125 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koenker, R., Bassett, G.: Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46, 33 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koenker, R., Hallock, K.F.: Quantile regression. J. Econ. Perspect. 15, 143–156 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buchinsky, M.: Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. J. Hum. Resour. 33, 88 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dormont, B., Samson, A.-L.: Medical demography and intergenerational inequalities in general practitioners’ earnings. Health Econ. 17, 1037–1055 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kehrer, B.H.: Factors affecting the incomes of men and women physicians: an exploratory analysis. J. Hum. Resour. 11, 526 (1976)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, C., Sweetman, A.: Gender, family status and physician labour supply. Soc. Sci. Med. 94, 17-25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sasser, A.C.: Gender differences in physician pay: tradeoffs between career and family. J. Hum. Resour. 40, 447–504 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rizzo, J.A., Blumenthal, D.: Physician labor supply: do income effects matter? J. Health Econ. 13, 433–453 (1994)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., Katz, L.F.: Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2, 228–255 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Glauber, R.: Race and gender in families and at work the fatherhood wage premium. Gend. Soc. 22, 8–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. RERS: Repères et références statistiques sur les enseignements, la formation et la recherche, French Ministry of Education 1, 83–84 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clerc, I., L’haridon, O., Paraponaris, A., Protopopescu, C., Ventelou, B.: Fee-for-service payments and consultation length in general practice: a work–leisure trade-off model for French GPs. Appl. Econ. 44, 3323–3337 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dumontet, M., Le Vaillant, M., Franc, C.: What determines the income gap between French male and female GPs - the role of medical practices. BMC Fam. Pract. 13, 94 (2012)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ventelou, B., Paraponaris, A., Sebbah, R., Aulagnier, M., Protopopescu, C., Gourheux, J.-C., Verger, P.: Un observatoire des pratiques en médecine générale: l’expérience menée en région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur. Rev. Fr. Aff. Soc. 1, 127–160 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gravelle, H., Hole, A.R., Santos, R.: Measuring and testing for gender discrimination in physician pay: English family doctors. J. Health Econ. 30, 660–674 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Firpo, S., Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T.: Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica 77, 953–973 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the two anonymous referees for helpful comments. We also thank the participants at XXX “Journées de Microéconomie appliquée”, at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the French Economic Association and at Journées des economistes de la santé. This research received financial support from the DREES (Direction of Research, Studies, Evaluation and Statistics) of the French Ministry of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magali Dumontet.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Regression results on the total annual fees earned at the reference price

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumontet, M., Franc, C. Gender differences in French GPs’ activity: the contribution of quantile regressions. Eur J Health Econ 16, 421–435 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0582-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0582-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation