The European Journal of Health Economics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 181–192

Treating pneumonia in critical care in the United Kingdom following failure of initial antibiotic: a cost-utility analysis comparing meropenem with piperacillin/tazobactam

  • Steven J. Edwards
  • Sarah Wordsworth
  • Mike J. Clarke
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0296-0

Cite this article as:
Edwards, S.J., Wordsworth, S. & Clarke, M.J. Eur J Health Econ (2012) 13: 181. doi:10.1007/s10198-011-0296-0
  • 355 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Treating patients admitted to critical care with severe pneumonia requires timely intervention with an effective antibiotic. This reduces the risk of dying of pneumonia and minimises complications associated with a prolonged stay in critical care.

Objective

To compare the cost-effectiveness of meropenem 1 g/8 h with piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g/8 h for treating pneumonia in UK critical care.

Methods

A Markov model was built to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of using meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam to treat severe pneumonia. Estimates of effectiveness, utility weights and costs were obtained from published sources. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to address uncertainty in the model results.

Results

Cost of treating a patient with severe pneumonia was estimated as £19,026 with meropenem and £19,978 with piperacillin/tazobactam, respectively. QALYs gained were 4.768 with meropenem and 4.654 with piperacillin/tazobactam. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed meropenem to be consistently less costly and more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam.

Conclusion

The additional efficacy of meropenem translates into more patients surviving critical care and leaving this high-cost service more quickly than if they had been treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. As meropenem is more effective and less expensive than piperacillin/tazobactam at treating patients with severe pneumonia, it is the dominant treatment option.

Keywords

MeropenemPiperacillinInfectionCritical careCost-effectiveness analysisEconomic evaluation

JEL Classification

L65

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Edwards
    • 1
  • Sarah Wordsworth
    • 2
  • Mike J. Clarke
    • 3
  1. 1.Kellogg CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.UK Cochrane CentreNational Institute for Health ResearchOxfordUK